Prolonged life and good death in Antiquity

S. Martynova, D. Bugaev
{"title":"Prolonged life and good death in Antiquity","authors":"S. Martynova, D. Bugaev","doi":"10.2478/ebce-2020-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper studies the connections between the notions of prolonging life and a good death in Antiquity. It is demonstrated that while prolonged life generally meant forestalling the human constitution’s death, ancient philosophers also pointed to the limitations of prolongation. The paper shows how philosophers welcomed prolonged life when it was shown to foster movement toward the good, such as self-realization and social usefulness. Yet, they rejected prolongation when it led to the perpetuation of evil, such as social uselessness and suffering. We ask whether a contemporary good death is a mercy killing or an improvement of prolonged life, as the ultimate end of “goods practicable for man”.","PeriodicalId":53173,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe)","volume":"30 1","pages":"1 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2020-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper studies the connections between the notions of prolonging life and a good death in Antiquity. It is demonstrated that while prolonged life generally meant forestalling the human constitution’s death, ancient philosophers also pointed to the limitations of prolongation. The paper shows how philosophers welcomed prolonged life when it was shown to foster movement toward the good, such as self-realization and social usefulness. Yet, they rejected prolongation when it led to the perpetuation of evil, such as social uselessness and suffering. We ask whether a contemporary good death is a mercy killing or an improvement of prolonged life, as the ultimate end of “goods practicable for man”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古代的长寿和善终
摘要本文研究了古代延年益寿观念与善死观念之间的联系。这表明,虽然延长寿命通常意味着阻止人类体质的死亡,但古代哲学家也指出了延长寿命的局限性。这篇论文展示了哲学家们是如何欢迎延长寿命的,因为它被证明可以促进向善的运动,比如自我实现和社会用途。然而,他们拒绝延长,因为它会导致邪恶的延续,例如社会无用和痛苦。我们要问,当代的善死究竟是一种安乐死,还是一种延长生命的改善,作为“对人类切实可行的物品”的最终目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe)
Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) is one of the leading Central European international journals in ethics and bioethics focusing on philosophical ethics, bioethics and applied ethics also including the history of ethics, ethical and moral education as well as professional ethics. The journal publishes theoretical articles as well as empirical findings concerning all aspects of ethics and morality. Authors can submit research articles, review articles, book reviews, conference reports and information on recently published books. Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) is published in print as well as electronic format, two issues per year (June and December). Only articles in English are accepted for publishing.
期刊最新文献
Ethical and marketing perspectives on surrogacy tourism The ethos of the fire service in the context of postmodern changes Fighting human hubris: Intelligence in nonhuman animals and artefacts War and peace as consequences of human nature? Free will, moral responsibility and automatisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1