Reporting and responding to patient safety incidents based on data from hospitals’ reporting systems: A systematic review

Ere Uibu, Kaja Põlluste, M. Lember, M. Kangasniemi
{"title":"Reporting and responding to patient safety incidents based on data from hospitals’ reporting systems: A systematic review","authors":"Ere Uibu, Kaja Põlluste, M. Lember, M. Kangasniemi","doi":"10.5430/jha.v9n2p22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This review summarizes and synthesizes the evidence on follow-up activities regarding patient safety incidents reported in hospitals. Methods: Peer-reviewed papers were retrieved with electronic searches from CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases and with manual searches in most relevant journals and in the reference lists of included studies, limiting searches to papers published in English between 2014 and 2018. A systematic review was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Two authors extracted the data following a predefined extraction form. Results: All together 16 studies were selected for analysis. All studies described incidents and gave insight into problems, risks and unsafe situations which were responded to with recommended improvements. Recommended improvements in response to incidents involved guidelines, staff training, technical improvements and general safety improvements. Only five studies reported feedback and knowledge dissemination activities, referring to meetings, written support and visual support. Conclusions: Limited research has described the systematic use of report outcomes for knowledge application in organizations. However, the development of patient safety requires that reported incidents are responded to by knowledge application within feedback and knowledge dissemination activities. Therefore, healthcare professionals need to have sufficient competences in patient safety, and more research is needed on the content and effectiveness of the responding activities.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"9 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v9n2p22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: This review summarizes and synthesizes the evidence on follow-up activities regarding patient safety incidents reported in hospitals. Methods: Peer-reviewed papers were retrieved with electronic searches from CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases and with manual searches in most relevant journals and in the reference lists of included studies, limiting searches to papers published in English between 2014 and 2018. A systematic review was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Two authors extracted the data following a predefined extraction form. Results: All together 16 studies were selected for analysis. All studies described incidents and gave insight into problems, risks and unsafe situations which were responded to with recommended improvements. Recommended improvements in response to incidents involved guidelines, staff training, technical improvements and general safety improvements. Only five studies reported feedback and knowledge dissemination activities, referring to meetings, written support and visual support. Conclusions: Limited research has described the systematic use of report outcomes for knowledge application in organizations. However, the development of patient safety requires that reported incidents are responded to by knowledge application within feedback and knowledge dissemination activities. Therefore, healthcare professionals need to have sufficient competences in patient safety, and more research is needed on the content and effectiveness of the responding activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据医院报告系统的数据报告和应对患者安全事件:系统审查
目的:总结和综合医院报告的患者安全事件后续活动的证据。方法:通过电子检索从CINAHL、Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus数据库检索同行评议论文,并在大多数相关期刊和纳入研究的参考文献列表中进行人工检索,将检索限制在2014年至2018年期间以英文发表的论文。根据系统评价和荟萃分析声明的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。两位作者按照预定义的提取表单提取数据。结果:共选择16项研究进行分析。所有研究都描述了事件,并对问题、风险和不安全情况进行了深入分析,并提出了改进建议。针对事故提出的改进建议包括指导方针、员工培训、技术改进和一般安全改进。只有五项研究报告了反馈和知识传播活动,涉及会议、书面支持和视觉支持。结论:有限的研究描述了在组织中系统地使用报告结果来应用知识。然而,患者安全的发展需要通过反馈和知识传播活动中的知识应用来响应报告的事件。因此,医疗保健专业人员需要在患者安全方面具备足够的能力,并且需要对响应活动的内容和有效性进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The reality of patient bodily waste management: Nurse perceptions of current practice & staff safety Facilitators and barriers for high-reliability training in medical centers Quality of care and emergency department throughput during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community health system Pandemic in a Community Health System Comparison of nursing staffing ratio in selected safety net and non-safety net hospitals in the United States Challenges and opportunities in achieving secure hospital clinical mobility management: An illustrative use case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1