The role of national culture as a lens for stakeholder evaluation of corporate social performance and its effect on corporate reputation

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Brq-Business Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-04-12 DOI:10.1177/23409444211007487
Clara Pérez‐Cornejo, Esther de Quevedo‐Puente, J. Delgado‐García
{"title":"The role of national culture as a lens for stakeholder evaluation of corporate social performance and its effect on corporate reputation","authors":"Clara Pérez‐Cornejo, Esther de Quevedo‐Puente, J. Delgado‐García","doi":"10.1177/23409444211007487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have shown that corporate social performance (CSP) is an antecedent of corporate reputation, acting as a signal that affects stakeholders’ perceptions and expectations about a firm’s future behavior. However, the perceptions, expectations, and interests of stakeholders may be affected by external factors, such as national culture, which shapes their beliefs about what role companies play in society. Drawing on institutional theory and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, we analyze how stakeholders’ national culture moderates the relationship between CSP and corporate reputation. The results of the analysis of an international sample for the period 2010 to 2016 show that low individualism (i.e., collectivism), low masculinity (i.e., femininity), low power distance, and low uncertainty avoidance intensify the positive relationship between CSP and corporate reputation. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M14, L14","PeriodicalId":46891,"journal":{"name":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":"282 - 296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211007487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Studies have shown that corporate social performance (CSP) is an antecedent of corporate reputation, acting as a signal that affects stakeholders’ perceptions and expectations about a firm’s future behavior. However, the perceptions, expectations, and interests of stakeholders may be affected by external factors, such as national culture, which shapes their beliefs about what role companies play in society. Drawing on institutional theory and Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, we analyze how stakeholders’ national culture moderates the relationship between CSP and corporate reputation. The results of the analysis of an international sample for the period 2010 to 2016 show that low individualism (i.e., collectivism), low masculinity (i.e., femininity), low power distance, and low uncertainty avoidance intensify the positive relationship between CSP and corporate reputation. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M14, L14
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家文化作为利益相关者评价企业社会绩效的视角及其对企业声誉的影响
研究表明,企业社会绩效(CSP)是企业声誉的先决条件,作为影响利益相关者对企业未来行为的感知和期望的信号。然而,利益相关者的看法、期望和利益可能会受到外部因素的影响,例如国家文化,这影响了他们对公司在社会中扮演的角色的看法。利用制度理论和Hofstede的文化维度,我们分析了利益相关者的民族文化如何调节CSP与企业声誉之间的关系。对2010年至2016年国际样本的分析结果表明,低个人主义(即集体主义)、低男性化(即女性化)、低权力距离和低不确定性规避强化了CSP与企业声誉之间的正相关关系。凝胶分类:m14、l14
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Strategic supplier performance in a competitive landscape: Enhancing organizational performance through lean supply chain management Leading a post-pandemic workforce: Understanding employees’ changing work ethic How to improve quality investing Uncertainty’s impact on adaptive performance in the post-COVID era: The moderating role of perceived leader’s effectiveness Strategy-making: The use and misuse of artifacts to achieve common understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1