{"title":"Criticality of AC0 formulae","authors":"P. Harsha, Tulasimohan Molli, Ashutosh Shankar","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2212.08397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rossman [In $\\textit{Proc. $34$th Comput. Complexity Conf.}$, 2019] introduced the notion of $\\textit{criticality}$. The criticality of a Boolean function $f : \\{0,1\\}^n \\to \\{0,1\\}$ is the minimum $\\lambda \\geq 1$ such that for all positive integers $t$, \\[ \\Pr_{\\rho \\sim \\mathcal{R}_p}\\left[\\text{DT}_{\\text{depth}}(f|_{\\rho}) \\geq t\\right] \\leq (p\\lambda)^t. \\] H\\\"astad's celebrated switching lemma shows that the criticality of any $k$-DNF is at most $O(k)$. Subsequent improvements to correlation bounds of $\\text{AC}^0$-circuits against parity showed that the criticality of any $\\text{AC}^0$-$\\textit{circuit}$ of size $S$ and depth $d+1$ is at most $O(\\log S)^d$ and any $\\textit{regular}$ $\\text{AC}^0$-$\\textit{formula}$ of size $S$ and depth $d+1$ is at most $O\\left(\\frac1d \\cdot \\log S\\right)^d$. We strengthen these results by showing that the criticality of $\\textit{any}$ $\\text{AC}^0$-formula (not necessarily regular) of size $S$ and depth $d+1$ is at most $O\\left(\\frac1d\\cdot {\\log S}\\right)^d$, resolving a conjecture due to Rossman. This result also implies Rossman's optimal lower bound on the size of any depth-$d$ $\\text{AC}^0$-formula computing parity [$\\textit{Comput. Complexity, 27(2):209--223, 2018.}$]. Our result implies tight correlation bounds against parity, tight Fourier concentration results and improved $\\#$SAT algorithm for $\\text{AC}^0$-formulae.","PeriodicalId":11639,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.08397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rossman [In $\textit{Proc. $34$th Comput. Complexity Conf.}$, 2019] introduced the notion of $\textit{criticality}$. The criticality of a Boolean function $f : \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ is the minimum $\lambda \geq 1$ such that for all positive integers $t$, \[ \Pr_{\rho \sim \mathcal{R}_p}\left[\text{DT}_{\text{depth}}(f|_{\rho}) \geq t\right] \leq (p\lambda)^t. \] H\"astad's celebrated switching lemma shows that the criticality of any $k$-DNF is at most $O(k)$. Subsequent improvements to correlation bounds of $\text{AC}^0$-circuits against parity showed that the criticality of any $\text{AC}^0$-$\textit{circuit}$ of size $S$ and depth $d+1$ is at most $O(\log S)^d$ and any $\textit{regular}$ $\text{AC}^0$-$\textit{formula}$ of size $S$ and depth $d+1$ is at most $O\left(\frac1d \cdot \log S\right)^d$. We strengthen these results by showing that the criticality of $\textit{any}$ $\text{AC}^0$-formula (not necessarily regular) of size $S$ and depth $d+1$ is at most $O\left(\frac1d\cdot {\log S}\right)^d$, resolving a conjecture due to Rossman. This result also implies Rossman's optimal lower bound on the size of any depth-$d$ $\text{AC}^0$-formula computing parity [$\textit{Comput. Complexity, 27(2):209--223, 2018.}$]. Our result implies tight correlation bounds against parity, tight Fourier concentration results and improved $\#$SAT algorithm for $\text{AC}^0$-formulae.