QSPR MODELS FOR ZETA-POTENTIAL OF NANO-OXIDES PREDICTION

Stelmakh Stelmakh, V. Kuz'min, L. M. Ognichenko
{"title":"QSPR MODELS FOR ZETA-POTENTIAL OF NANO-OXIDES PREDICTION","authors":"Stelmakh Stelmakh, V. Kuz'min, L. M. Ognichenko","doi":"10.18524/2304-0947.2021.2(78).239101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nano-QSPR modeling often requires considering variety of factors, if neglected, may lead to erroneous result of the study. Frequently, the data turned out to be inaccurate, incomplete, or fragmentary. Obviously, the quality of experimental data directly depends on many factors: laboratory equipment, organization of internal regulations, skills of researchers, and so on. As a result of violations of algorithms and protocols of initial data streams processing – there are errors and distortions of data, that is why performing a solid multistep data-curation process is crucial for such procedures. Data curation procedure was performed and approximately 60% was rejected (due to various errors, incomplete or absent records for physicochemical parameters or conditions of performed experiment), followed up by using zeta-potential value dataset for 37 various sizes nanoparticles of 14 metal oxides for calculation of 1D SiRMS descriptors as well as «liquid drop» model cross-descriptors. An efficient consensus model was built (R2 = 0.88, R2test = 0.81). Predictive power (R2 = 0.84) of the model was tested using an external set of 5 nano-oxides and the possibility of satisfactory zeta-potential prediction was shown. Prediction of zeta-potential value within domain applicability of obtained QSPR model confirmed using a Williams plot. The interpretation of the final model was carried out and it was found that the contribution of descriptors was distributed between individual descriptors and cross-descriptors by 46% and 54% respectively. The contribution 1D SiRMS descriptors was 59%, the second group – 41% (liquid drop model descriptors – 29%, descriptors characterizing the metal atom – 12%). It was found that the most influential parameters are the characteristics that reflect the nature of the oxides. The parameters of electrostatic interactions have the highest contribution.","PeriodicalId":19451,"journal":{"name":"Odesa National University Herald. Chemistry","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odesa National University Herald. Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-0947.2021.2(78).239101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nano-QSPR modeling often requires considering variety of factors, if neglected, may lead to erroneous result of the study. Frequently, the data turned out to be inaccurate, incomplete, or fragmentary. Obviously, the quality of experimental data directly depends on many factors: laboratory equipment, organization of internal regulations, skills of researchers, and so on. As a result of violations of algorithms and protocols of initial data streams processing – there are errors and distortions of data, that is why performing a solid multistep data-curation process is crucial for such procedures. Data curation procedure was performed and approximately 60% was rejected (due to various errors, incomplete or absent records for physicochemical parameters or conditions of performed experiment), followed up by using zeta-potential value dataset for 37 various sizes nanoparticles of 14 metal oxides for calculation of 1D SiRMS descriptors as well as «liquid drop» model cross-descriptors. An efficient consensus model was built (R2 = 0.88, R2test = 0.81). Predictive power (R2 = 0.84) of the model was tested using an external set of 5 nano-oxides and the possibility of satisfactory zeta-potential prediction was shown. Prediction of zeta-potential value within domain applicability of obtained QSPR model confirmed using a Williams plot. The interpretation of the final model was carried out and it was found that the contribution of descriptors was distributed between individual descriptors and cross-descriptors by 46% and 54% respectively. The contribution 1D SiRMS descriptors was 59%, the second group – 41% (liquid drop model descriptors – 29%, descriptors characterizing the metal atom – 12%). It was found that the most influential parameters are the characteristics that reflect the nature of the oxides. The parameters of electrostatic interactions have the highest contribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳米氧化物ζ电位预测的QSPR模型
纳米qspr建模往往需要考虑多种因素,如果忽视,可能会导致错误的研究结果。这些数据往往是不准确的、不完整的或零碎的。显然,实验数据的质量直接取决于许多因素:实验室设备、内部法规的组织、研究人员的技能等等。由于违反了初始数据流处理的算法和协议-存在数据的错误和扭曲,这就是为什么执行可靠的多步骤数据管理过程对于此类过程至关重要。执行数据管理程序,大约60%的数据被拒绝(由于各种错误,物理化学参数或实验条件的不完整或缺失记录),随后使用14种金属氧化物的37种不同尺寸纳米颗粒的ζ电位值数据集计算1D SiRMS描述符以及“液滴”模型交叉描述符。建立了有效的共识模型(R2 = 0.88, R2test = 0.81)。使用5种纳米氧化物对模型的预测能力(R2 = 0.84)进行了测试,表明该模型有可能实现令人满意的ζ电位预测。利用Williams图对所得QSPR模型在域适用性范围内的ζ势值进行了预测。对最终模型进行了解释,发现描述符的贡献分布在单个描述符和交叉描述符之间,分别为46%和54%。1D SiRMS描述符的贡献为59%,第二组为41%(液滴模型描述符为29%,表征金属原子的描述符为12%)。结果表明,反映氧化物性质的特性是影响性能的主要参数。静电相互作用参数的贡献最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHEMOSORPTION COMPOSITIONS BASED ON PHLOGOPITE FOR LOW-TEMPERATURE AIR PURIFICATION FROM SULFUR DIOXIDE IN MEMORY OF VALENTYNA FEDORIVNA SAZONOVA (1943–2021) SORPTION OF APOLAR LIQUIDS BY NATURAL HIGH MOLECULAR COMPOUNDS SYNTHESIS AND STRUCTURE OF COORDINATION COMPOUND OF COBALT(II) 5-SULFOSALICYLATE WITH BENZOHYDRAZIDE COPOLYMERIZATION OF UNSATURATED OLIGOESTERS MODIFIED WITH NITROGEN-CONTAINING COMPOUNDS WITH METHYL METHACRYLATE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1