Computed tomography evaluation of diaphragm alterations in 20 critically ill COVID-19 positive patients

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.2478/amma-2022-0014
Oana-Elena Branea, A. R. Budeanu, Razvan-Gabriel Budeanu, Adrian Ștefan Chiuzan, Ioana Lăcrămioara Nazaret, S. Copotoiu, A. Lazăr
{"title":"Computed tomography evaluation of diaphragm alterations in 20 critically ill COVID-19 positive patients","authors":"Oana-Elena Branea, A. R. Budeanu, Razvan-Gabriel Budeanu, Adrian Ștefan Chiuzan, Ioana Lăcrămioara Nazaret, S. Copotoiu, A. Lazăr","doi":"10.2478/amma-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Diaphragmatic dysfunctions are multiple and critical illnesses often lead to the muscular atrophy that affects respiratory and peripheral muscles. The primary objective was to investigate diaphragm thickness in hospitalized patients. Secondary objectives were to assess clinical evolution and outcome. Methods: In a mean time period of 7.9 days, two different chest computed tomographies were used in order to examine diaphragm alterations of right and left diaphragm in 20 critically ill patients tested Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction positive to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2. Patients were divided in two groups (one group <5% decrease in diaphragm thickness and another group ≥5% decrease in diaphragm thickness). Results: Results showed that patients presented low 10 years predicted survival rate (Charlson Comorbidity Index > 7.7±3.08), marked inflammatory status (C-Reactive Protein = 98.22±73.35, Interleukine-6 = 168.31±255.28), high physiologic stress level (Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio = 31.27±30.45), respectively altered acid-base equilibrium. Half of the investigated patients had decrease in diaphragm thickness by at least 5% (right diaphragm = −7.83%±11.11%, left diaphragm = −5.57%±10.63%). There were no statistically significant differences between those with decrease of diaphragm thickness and those without diaphragm thickness, regarding length of stay in Intensive Care Unit and in hospital, inflammatory markers, and acid-base disorders. Conclusions: Patients were admitted in Intensive Care Unit for acute respiratory failure and half of the investigated patients displayed diaphragm alterations at CT scan.","PeriodicalId":36282,"journal":{"name":"Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amma-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Diaphragmatic dysfunctions are multiple and critical illnesses often lead to the muscular atrophy that affects respiratory and peripheral muscles. The primary objective was to investigate diaphragm thickness in hospitalized patients. Secondary objectives were to assess clinical evolution and outcome. Methods: In a mean time period of 7.9 days, two different chest computed tomographies were used in order to examine diaphragm alterations of right and left diaphragm in 20 critically ill patients tested Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction positive to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2. Patients were divided in two groups (one group <5% decrease in diaphragm thickness and another group ≥5% decrease in diaphragm thickness). Results: Results showed that patients presented low 10 years predicted survival rate (Charlson Comorbidity Index > 7.7±3.08), marked inflammatory status (C-Reactive Protein = 98.22±73.35, Interleukine-6 = 168.31±255.28), high physiologic stress level (Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio = 31.27±30.45), respectively altered acid-base equilibrium. Half of the investigated patients had decrease in diaphragm thickness by at least 5% (right diaphragm = −7.83%±11.11%, left diaphragm = −5.57%±10.63%). There were no statistically significant differences between those with decrease of diaphragm thickness and those without diaphragm thickness, regarding length of stay in Intensive Care Unit and in hospital, inflammatory markers, and acid-base disorders. Conclusions: Patients were admitted in Intensive Care Unit for acute respiratory failure and half of the investigated patients displayed diaphragm alterations at CT scan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20例COVID-19阳性危重患者膈膜改变的ct评价
摘要目的:膈肌功能障碍是一种多危性疾病,常导致肌肉萎缩,影响呼吸肌和外周肌。主要目的是调查住院患者的横膈膜厚度。次要目的是评估临床进展和结果。方法:在平均7.9 d的时间内,对20例实时聚合酶链反应(Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction,简称pcr)检测为冠状病毒2型(sars)阳性的危重患者,采用2种不同的胸部计算机断层扫描,观察其左右横膈膜的变化。患者分为两组(一组7.7±3.08),炎症状态明显(c -反应蛋白= 98.22±73.35,白细胞介素-6 = 168.31±255.28),生理应激水平高(中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值= 31.27±30.45),酸碱平衡改变。半数患者膈肌厚度至少减少5%(右膈= - 7.83%±11.11%,左膈= - 5.57%±10.63%)。在重症监护病房和住院时间、炎症指标和酸碱失调方面,膈膜厚度减少组和无膈膜厚度组的差异无统计学意义。结论:重症监护病房收治的急性呼吸衰竭患者中有一半在CT扫描中显示膈膜改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica
Acta Marisiensis - Seria Medica Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nucleostemin and p-STAT3 as early diagnostic potential markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma Packed cell volume and its relation to obesity, gender and smoking status Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm – Management of an extremely rare case of pancreatic tumor in a young patient Psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and their combination in the treatment of major depressive disorder: How well are we making use of available therapies? Histological patterns of testicular biopsy in patients with azoospermia: single-institution experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1