Observation on the Functioning of the Anterior Chamber Angle after Combined Glaucoma and Cataract Surgery in the Chronic Phase of Acute Angle-Closure Glaucoma with Cataract

Y. Chu, Xiao-yuan Yang, Haiyan Zhu, Hai-Jia Li, Yangzeng Dong
{"title":"Observation on the Functioning of the Anterior Chamber Angle after Combined Glaucoma and Cataract Surgery in the Chronic Phase of Acute Angle-Closure Glaucoma with Cataract","authors":"Y. Chu, Xiao-yuan Yang, Haiyan Zhu, Hai-Jia Li, Yangzeng Dong","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo investigate the functioning of the anterior chamber angle after combined surgery in the treatment of the chronic phase of acute angle-closure glaucoma with cataract. \n \n \nMethods: \nA retrospective analysis was performed on 37 patients (37 eyes) in the chronic phase of acute angle-closure glaucoma with cataract who were treated in the glaucoma center of Henan Provincial People's Hospital from November 2017 to March 2018: All patients were treated with drugs after an acute attack for 3-14 days; preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was higher than 21 mmHg; gonioscopic examination: angle closure >2 quadrant; ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM): Anterior chamber shallow, peripheral iris root and trabecular meshwork attachment range >2 quadrant; lens nuclear turbidity ≥Ⅲ. All patients underwent conventional double-incision surgery combined with trabeculectomy, phacoemulsification cataract extraction, intraocular lens implantation, and angle separation. No anti-metabolite drugs were used during the surgery. The scleral flap was tightly closed with an adjustable suture. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, central anterior chamber depth, angle opening range and filtration bleb formation were observed before and after surgery. The Wilcoxon test, analysis of variance, paired t test and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the observation index. \n \n \nResults: \nAt 7 days after surgery: The mean IOP was 18.8±1.7 mmHg, which was significantly lower than IOP before surgery (t=16.562, P 2 quadrants after surgery, and there was no correlation between postoperative IOP and preoperative anterior angle (r=0.016, P=0.926); the depth of the central anterior chamber was deeper than before surgery (t=-25.195, P<0.001); the postoperative BCVA of 33 patients was improved compared with BCVA before surgery, the BCVA of 4 patients did not improve, the difference in BCVA before and after surgery was statistically significant (Z=-5.017, P<0.001); 5 patients had functional filtering blebs formation in the upper conjunctiva, 32 patients had no obvious filtering blebs after surgery, ultrasound biomicroscopy also confirmed that no effective filtering blebs formed under the conjunctiva. \n \n \nConclusions: \nFor patients in the chronic phase of acute angle-closure glaucoma with cataract, combined trabeculectomy plus cataract surgery plus angle separation can effectively reduce intraocular pressure. The decrease in intraocular pressure is likely to depend on the recovery of the function of the trabecular meshwork, rather than to rely on the establishment of an external filtration channel. \n \n \nKey words: \nacute angle-closure glaucoma; chronic phase; glaucoma and cataract combined surgery; the function of anterior chamber angle","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"17 4 1","pages":"8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the functioning of the anterior chamber angle after combined surgery in the treatment of the chronic phase of acute angle-closure glaucoma with cataract. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 37 patients (37 eyes) in the chronic phase of acute angle-closure glaucoma with cataract who were treated in the glaucoma center of Henan Provincial People's Hospital from November 2017 to March 2018: All patients were treated with drugs after an acute attack for 3-14 days; preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was higher than 21 mmHg; gonioscopic examination: angle closure >2 quadrant; ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM): Anterior chamber shallow, peripheral iris root and trabecular meshwork attachment range >2 quadrant; lens nuclear turbidity ≥Ⅲ. All patients underwent conventional double-incision surgery combined with trabeculectomy, phacoemulsification cataract extraction, intraocular lens implantation, and angle separation. No anti-metabolite drugs were used during the surgery. The scleral flap was tightly closed with an adjustable suture. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, central anterior chamber depth, angle opening range and filtration bleb formation were observed before and after surgery. The Wilcoxon test, analysis of variance, paired t test and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the observation index. Results: At 7 days after surgery: The mean IOP was 18.8±1.7 mmHg, which was significantly lower than IOP before surgery (t=16.562, P 2 quadrants after surgery, and there was no correlation between postoperative IOP and preoperative anterior angle (r=0.016, P=0.926); the depth of the central anterior chamber was deeper than before surgery (t=-25.195, P<0.001); the postoperative BCVA of 33 patients was improved compared with BCVA before surgery, the BCVA of 4 patients did not improve, the difference in BCVA before and after surgery was statistically significant (Z=-5.017, P<0.001); 5 patients had functional filtering blebs formation in the upper conjunctiva, 32 patients had no obvious filtering blebs after surgery, ultrasound biomicroscopy also confirmed that no effective filtering blebs formed under the conjunctiva. Conclusions: For patients in the chronic phase of acute angle-closure glaucoma with cataract, combined trabeculectomy plus cataract surgery plus angle separation can effectively reduce intraocular pressure. The decrease in intraocular pressure is likely to depend on the recovery of the function of the trabecular meshwork, rather than to rely on the establishment of an external filtration channel. Key words: acute angle-closure glaucoma; chronic phase; glaucoma and cataract combined surgery; the function of anterior chamber angle
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性闭角型青光眼合并白内障慢性期术后前房角功能的观察
目的:探讨急性闭角型青光眼合并白内障慢性期联合手术后前房角的功能。方法:回顾性分析2017年11月至2018年3月在河南省人民医院青光眼中心治疗的急性闭角型青光眼合并白内障慢行期患者37例(37眼),均在急性发作3 ~ 14天后给予药物治疗;术前眼压(IOP) > 21 mmHg;角镜检查:闭角>2象限;超声生物显微镜(UBM):前房浅,周围虹膜根及小梁网附着范围>2象限;晶状体核浊度≥Ⅲ。所有患者均行常规双切口手术联合小梁切除术、超声乳化白内障摘除、人工晶状体植入术和角度分离。术中未使用抗代谢药物。巩膜瓣用可调节缝线紧密闭合。观察手术前后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、IOP、中央前房深度、角开范围及滤过泡形成情况。观察指标分析采用Wilcoxon检验、方差分析、配对t检验和Pearson相关分析。结果:术后7 d:平均IOP为18.8±1.7 mmHg,明显低于术前IOP (t=16.562,术后P 2象限,术后IOP与术前前角无相关性(r=0.016, P=0.926);中央前房深度较术前加深(t=-25.195, P<0.001);33例患者术后BCVA较术前改善,4例患者BCVA未改善,术前、术后BCVA差异有统计学意义(Z=-5.017, P<0.001);5例患者上结膜形成功能性滤过泡,32例术后未见明显滤过泡,超声生物显微镜检查也证实结膜下未形成有效滤过泡。结论:对于急性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的慢性期患者,联合小梁切除术加白内障手术加角度分离可有效降低眼压。眼压的降低可能依赖于小梁网功能的恢复,而不是依赖于外滤过通道的建立。关键词:急性闭角型青光眼;慢性阶段;青光眼、白内障联合手术;前房角的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1