A factor analysis of landlords’ and retail trade tenants’ different beliefs in lease negotiations: evidence from the Swedish market

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of European Real Estate Research Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1108/jerer-08-2022-0023
B. Lundgren, Cecilia Hermansson, Filip Gyllenberg, Johan Koppfeldt
{"title":"A factor analysis of landlords’ and retail trade tenants’ different beliefs in lease negotiations: evidence from the Swedish market","authors":"B. Lundgren, Cecilia Hermansson, Filip Gyllenberg, Johan Koppfeldt","doi":"10.1108/jerer-08-2022-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose is to increase knowledge of rent negotiations by investigating differences in beliefs held by property landlords and retailers on factors that they deem important in rent negotiation.Design/methodology/approach This study investigates differences in subjective beliefs held by landlords and retail trade tenants on factors that affect rent levels during the rent negotiation process using a factor analysis approach. Semi-structured interviews were made with seven large real estate owners/landlords and retailers and eight experts in negotiating retail rent to elicit variables that have an impact on retail rent. Thereafter, a web-based survey was sent to 421 respondents who had experience in rent negotiation. Several factors were extracted using factor analysis. The data collection was made in Sweden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in late spring 2021Findings Significant differences are found in beliefs held by landlords and retail trade tenants in four out of seven-factor: regional growth, e-commerce, customer focus and trust. Landlords rate these factors higher than retailers do. There are also systematic differences between landlords and retailers depending on their education levels on the following factors: rent and vacancies, e-commerce and customer focus. The number of years of experience did not prove to be significant instead differences are found to exist in factorsResearch limitations/implications Not only do traditional factors of importance, such as lease structure, the effect of location, size and anchor or non-anchor tenants, have an effect on negotiated rent levels. Differences in other factors also exist, such as regional growth, e-commerce, customer focus and trust factors that may play an important role in the negation of retail rent.Practical implications The findings provide new insights into the different views on factors that affect rent negotiations between landlords and retail tenants. Knowledge of such differences may increase the overall transparency in the negotiation process. Transparency may be increased by putting forward information on these factors before a negotiation takes place, in order to smooth differences in their beliefs.Social implications If transparency in the negotiation process of retail rent increases, time to reach an agreement, stress and anxiety can be reduced by putting forward information on factors where differences exist between landlords and retailersOriginality/value New insights on retail rent negotiation have been put forward in this research paper. Not only do traditional factors such as lease structure matters, but subjective beliefs on factors such as regional growth and the level of education are also important, as this study has shown using a factors analysis approach.","PeriodicalId":44570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jerer-08-2022-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose is to increase knowledge of rent negotiations by investigating differences in beliefs held by property landlords and retailers on factors that they deem important in rent negotiation.Design/methodology/approach This study investigates differences in subjective beliefs held by landlords and retail trade tenants on factors that affect rent levels during the rent negotiation process using a factor analysis approach. Semi-structured interviews were made with seven large real estate owners/landlords and retailers and eight experts in negotiating retail rent to elicit variables that have an impact on retail rent. Thereafter, a web-based survey was sent to 421 respondents who had experience in rent negotiation. Several factors were extracted using factor analysis. The data collection was made in Sweden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in late spring 2021Findings Significant differences are found in beliefs held by landlords and retail trade tenants in four out of seven-factor: regional growth, e-commerce, customer focus and trust. Landlords rate these factors higher than retailers do. There are also systematic differences between landlords and retailers depending on their education levels on the following factors: rent and vacancies, e-commerce and customer focus. The number of years of experience did not prove to be significant instead differences are found to exist in factorsResearch limitations/implications Not only do traditional factors of importance, such as lease structure, the effect of location, size and anchor or non-anchor tenants, have an effect on negotiated rent levels. Differences in other factors also exist, such as regional growth, e-commerce, customer focus and trust factors that may play an important role in the negation of retail rent.Practical implications The findings provide new insights into the different views on factors that affect rent negotiations between landlords and retail tenants. Knowledge of such differences may increase the overall transparency in the negotiation process. Transparency may be increased by putting forward information on these factors before a negotiation takes place, in order to smooth differences in their beliefs.Social implications If transparency in the negotiation process of retail rent increases, time to reach an agreement, stress and anxiety can be reduced by putting forward information on factors where differences exist between landlords and retailersOriginality/value New insights on retail rent negotiation have been put forward in this research paper. Not only do traditional factors such as lease structure matters, but subjective beliefs on factors such as regional growth and the level of education are also important, as this study has shown using a factors analysis approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
房东和零售贸易租户在租赁谈判中不同信念的因素分析:来自瑞典市场的证据
目的是通过调查物业业主和零售商在他们认为租金谈判中重要因素的信念差异来增加对租金谈判的了解。设计/方法/方法本研究采用因素分析方法,调查房东和零售业租户在租金谈判过程中对影响租金水平的因素所持的主观信念的差异。我们对7位大型房地产业主/房东和零售商以及8位零售租金谈判专家进行了半结构化访谈,以得出影响零售租金的变量。之后,一份基于网络的调查被发送给421名有过租金谈判经验的受访者。利用因子分析提取了几个影响因子。调查结果发现,在7个因素中的4个方面,房东和零售贸易租户的信念存在显著差异:区域增长、电子商务、客户关注和信任。房东对这些因素的评价高于零售商。根据受教育程度不同,房东和零售商在以下因素上也存在系统性差异:租金和空置率、电子商务和客户关注。经验的年数并没有被证明是显著的,相反,在因素中发现了差异。研究的局限性/启示不仅传统的重要因素,如租赁结构、地点的影响、规模和锚定或非锚定租户,对协商租金水平有影响。其他因素的差异也存在,如区域增长、电子商务、客户关注和信任因素,这些因素可能在零售租金的负面影响中发挥重要作用。研究结果对影响业主和零售租户租金谈判因素的不同观点提供了新的见解。了解这些差异可能会增加谈判进程的总体透明度。在进行谈判之前提出关于这些因素的资料,可以增加透明度,以消除他们在信念上的分歧。如果提高零售租金谈判过程的透明度,通过提供房东和零售商之间存在差异的因素的信息,可以减少达成协议的时间,压力和焦虑。正如本研究使用因素分析方法所显示的那样,不仅租赁结构等传统因素很重要,对区域增长和教育水平等因素的主观信念也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of renovation subsidies on housing markets – evidence from the Swedish property market Adoption and willingness to use property management software among real estate tech start-ups in Lagos State, Nigeria Barriers and prospects for the adoption of blockchain technology in property valuation Investigating the impact of housing price increases on consumption: heterogeneity by age, tenure and housing quality Valuation of cyclical assets and exit value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1