Japan's "Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy" and Its Implication for ASEAN

Tomohiko Satake
{"title":"Japan's \"Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy\" and Its Implication for ASEAN","authors":"Tomohiko Satake","doi":"10.1355/9789814843164-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In August 2016, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced the “Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy” (FOIPs) at the Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD) held in Kenya. Since then, many researchers, journalists and policymakers have discussed what the FOIP Strategy, and the broader concept of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP), exactly means. For some, FOIPs is essentially an exclusive concept that views China as “a hostile existential threat to regional (and global) order, prosperity, and Western interests”. Such a view tends to see Abe’s FOIPs primarily as a geopolitical strategy aimed at countering Chinese power and influence by creating a maritime coalition with regional democracies, represented by the Quadrilateral Security Cooperation (Quad) between Japan, Australia, India and the United States. The FOIPs is also commonly seen as a competitor or “geoeconomic” strategy against China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) by providing the region with alternatives to BRI projects. For others, however, FOIPs is an inclusive concept that ultimately aims to incorporate China and other powers in an inclusive political and economic system in the Indo-Pacific. Such a view, often stressed by the Japanese government and its officials, tends to dismiss the geopolitical aspect of FOIPs and argues that FOIPs is a comprehensive framework or “vision” for Japanese regional policies, mostly its economic and development cooperation such as infrastructure development and support for regional connectivity. This kind of view also stresses the cooperative, as well as the competitive, aspects of FOIPs by pointing out many overlaps or","PeriodicalId":21900,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asian Affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asian Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814843164-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

In August 2016, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced the “Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy” (FOIPs) at the Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD) held in Kenya. Since then, many researchers, journalists and policymakers have discussed what the FOIP Strategy, and the broader concept of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP), exactly means. For some, FOIPs is essentially an exclusive concept that views China as “a hostile existential threat to regional (and global) order, prosperity, and Western interests”. Such a view tends to see Abe’s FOIPs primarily as a geopolitical strategy aimed at countering Chinese power and influence by creating a maritime coalition with regional democracies, represented by the Quadrilateral Security Cooperation (Quad) between Japan, Australia, India and the United States. The FOIPs is also commonly seen as a competitor or “geoeconomic” strategy against China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) by providing the region with alternatives to BRI projects. For others, however, FOIPs is an inclusive concept that ultimately aims to incorporate China and other powers in an inclusive political and economic system in the Indo-Pacific. Such a view, often stressed by the Japanese government and its officials, tends to dismiss the geopolitical aspect of FOIPs and argues that FOIPs is a comprehensive framework or “vision” for Japanese regional policies, mostly its economic and development cooperation such as infrastructure development and support for regional connectivity. This kind of view also stresses the cooperative, as well as the competitive, aspects of FOIPs by pointing out many overlaps or
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本“自由开放的印太战略”及其对东盟的启示
2016年8月,日本首相安倍晋三在肯尼亚举行的东京非洲发展国际会议上宣布了“自由开放的印太战略”。从那时起,许多研究人员、记者和政策制定者都在讨论“自由开放的印度-太平洋”战略以及更广泛的“自由开放的印度-太平洋”概念的确切含义。对一些人来说,foip本质上是一个排他性的概念,将中国视为“对地区(和全球)秩序、繁荣和西方利益的敌对存在的威胁”。这种观点倾向于将安倍的FOIPs主要视为一种地缘政治战略,旨在通过与地区民主国家建立海上联盟来对抗中国的力量和影响力,以日本、澳大利亚、印度和美国之间的四方安全合作(Quad)为代表。FOIPs通常也被视为中国“一带一路”倡议的竞争对手或“地缘经济”战略,为该地区提供“一带一路”项目的替代方案。然而,对其他人来说,FOIPs是一个包容性的概念,其最终目的是将中国和其他大国纳入印度-太平洋地区的包容性政治和经济体系。日本政府及其官员经常强调的这种观点往往忽视了FOIPs的地缘政治方面,并认为FOIPs是日本区域政策的综合框架或“愿景”,主要是其经济和发展合作,如基础设施发展和支持区域连通性。这种观点还通过指出许多重叠点来强调foip的合作性和竞争性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Outlook for Southeast Asia: From Containment to Recovery Brunei Darussalam in 2020: Enduring Stability of a Small Monarchical State in a Turbulent Year Cambodian Foreign Policy in 2020: Chinese Friends and American Foes? Malaysia in 2020: Political Fragmentation, Power Plays and Shifting Coalitions Vietnam’s Economic Prospects in the Wake of the US-China Trade Conflict and COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1