Collecting Field-Based Oral Language Data: Experiences and Reflections

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Rural Special Education Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.3126/jeqtu.v4i1.57244
K. Poudel, K. Devkota, B. Luitel
{"title":"Collecting Field-Based Oral Language Data: Experiences and Reflections","authors":"K. Poudel, K. Devkota, B. Luitel","doi":"10.3126/jeqtu.v4i1.57244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article unfolds our experiences and reflections of field-based oral corpus collection from the Nepali language in the business setting applying observation, audio-recording, interview and field notes as qualitative techniques. Understanding our own role as auto ethnographic researchers-as-authors, in this article, we draw a set of fieldwork traits: the simplicity of the fieldworker(s), context-dependence of appropriating research ethics, and understanding fieldwork as a spiral process. Based on our practical experiences, we recognize that the qualitative interview is an inefficacious technique for collecting functional linguistic data. Likewise, preserving the linguistic-cultural identity of the source language in terms of its forms, functions and sense while translating the corpus is challenging. We also recognize some fundamental traits to be followed by an oral corpus collector: relative simultaneity of data collection and analysis, the researcher’s autonomy in selecting the topic, the value of good planning in research, research as work and habits, and life and health as being more important than research. The insights derived herein are expected to be pivotal for the researchers working in a similar field.","PeriodicalId":45133,"journal":{"name":"Rural Special Education Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural Special Education Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jeqtu.v4i1.57244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article unfolds our experiences and reflections of field-based oral corpus collection from the Nepali language in the business setting applying observation, audio-recording, interview and field notes as qualitative techniques. Understanding our own role as auto ethnographic researchers-as-authors, in this article, we draw a set of fieldwork traits: the simplicity of the fieldworker(s), context-dependence of appropriating research ethics, and understanding fieldwork as a spiral process. Based on our practical experiences, we recognize that the qualitative interview is an inefficacious technique for collecting functional linguistic data. Likewise, preserving the linguistic-cultural identity of the source language in terms of its forms, functions and sense while translating the corpus is challenging. We also recognize some fundamental traits to be followed by an oral corpus collector: relative simultaneity of data collection and analysis, the researcher’s autonomy in selecting the topic, the value of good planning in research, research as work and habits, and life and health as being more important than research. The insights derived herein are expected to be pivotal for the researchers working in a similar field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于现场的口语数据收集:经验与思考
本文运用观察法、录音法、访谈法和实地笔记法等定性方法,展现了我们在商业环境下尼泊尔语现场口语语料库收集的经验和思考。在本文中,我们理解了自己作为汽车民族志研究者和作者的角色,得出了一系列田野调查的特征:田野调查工作者的简单性、研究伦理的语境依赖性以及将田野调查理解为一个螺旋过程。根据我们的实践经验,我们认识到定性访谈是一种收集功能语言数据的无效技术。同样,在翻译语料库的同时,在形式、功能和意义上保持源语的语言文化特征也是一项挑战。我们还认识到口头语料库收集者应该遵循的一些基本特征:数据收集和分析的相对同时性,研究人员选择主题的自主权,研究中良好规划的价值,研究作为工作和习惯,生活和健康比研究更重要。在此得出的见解有望对在类似领域工作的研究人员起到关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural Special Education Quarterly
Rural Special Education Quarterly EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Preparing Future Special Education Faculty for Service in Rural Communities Riding Fences Inference Instruction for Students With Reading Disabilities A Survey of Rural Special Education Teachers’ Professional Development Experiences What Do Rural Special Education Teachers Say? Examining the Reported Needs and Recommendations for Retention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1