Pronoun Lists in Profile Bios Display Increased Prevalence, Systematic Co-Presence with Other Keywords and Network Tie Clustering among US Twitter Users 2015-2022

Liam Tucker, Jason Jeffrey Jones
{"title":"Pronoun Lists in Profile Bios Display Increased Prevalence, Systematic Co-Presence with Other Keywords and Network Tie Clustering among US Twitter Users 2015-2022","authors":"Liam Tucker, Jason Jeffrey Jones","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2023.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past few years, pronoun lists have become more prevalent in online spaces. Currently, various LGBT+ activists, universities, and corporations encourage people to share their preferred pronouns. Little research exists examining the characteristics of individuals who do publicly share their preferred pronouns. Using Twitter bios from the US between early 2015 and June 30, 2022, we explored users’ expression of preferred pronouns. First, we noted the prevalence of users with pronoun lists within their bio has increased substantially. Second, we observed that certain linguistic tokens systematically co-occurred with pronoun lists. Specifically, tokens associated with left-wing politics, gender or sexual identity, and social media argot co-occurred disproportionately often alongside pronoun lists, while tokens associated with right-wing politics, religion, sports, and finance co-occurred infrequently. Additionally, we discovered clustering among Twitter users with pronouns in their bios. Specifically, we found an above-average proportion of the followers and friends of Twitter users with pronouns in their bio also had pronouns in their bios. Twitter users who did not share their preferred pronouns, on the other hand, were disproportionately unlikely to be connected with Twitter users who did.","PeriodicalId":93587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","volume":"31 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2023.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Over the past few years, pronoun lists have become more prevalent in online spaces. Currently, various LGBT+ activists, universities, and corporations encourage people to share their preferred pronouns. Little research exists examining the characteristics of individuals who do publicly share their preferred pronouns. Using Twitter bios from the US between early 2015 and June 30, 2022, we explored users’ expression of preferred pronouns. First, we noted the prevalence of users with pronoun lists within their bio has increased substantially. Second, we observed that certain linguistic tokens systematically co-occurred with pronoun lists. Specifically, tokens associated with left-wing politics, gender or sexual identity, and social media argot co-occurred disproportionately often alongside pronoun lists, while tokens associated with right-wing politics, religion, sports, and finance co-occurred infrequently. Additionally, we discovered clustering among Twitter users with pronouns in their bios. Specifically, we found an above-average proportion of the followers and friends of Twitter users with pronouns in their bio also had pronouns in their bios. Twitter users who did not share their preferred pronouns, on the other hand, were disproportionately unlikely to be connected with Twitter users who did.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015-2022年美国Twitter用户中,个人资料Bios中代词列表的流行率、与其他关键词的系统共存率和网络联系聚类率均有所上升
在过去的几年里,代词列表在网络空间变得越来越普遍。目前,各种LGBT+活动家、大学和公司鼓励人们分享他们喜欢的代词。很少有研究调查那些公开分享自己喜欢的代词的人的特征。我们使用2015年初至2022年6月30日期间美国Twitter的个人信息,研究了用户对首选代词的表达。首先,我们注意到在他们的个人信息中使用代词列表的用户的普遍程度已经大大增加。其次,我们观察到某些语言符号系统地与代词列表共同出现。具体来说,与左翼政治、性别或性身份以及社交媒体暗语相关的代币与代词列表同时出现的频率不成比例,而与右翼政治、宗教、体育和金融相关的代币却很少同时出现。此外,我们发现Twitter用户的个人简介中有代词。具体来说,我们发现推特用户的关注者和朋友中有代词的比例高于平均水平,他们的个人简介中也有代词。另一方面,那些不分享自己喜欢的代词的Twitter用户,不成比例地不可能与那些分享自己喜欢的代词的Twitter用户建立联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#Asylum: How Syrian Refugees Engage with Online Information Who Does(n't) Target You? A Dataset for The Study of Online Radicalization Through Incel Forum Archives Detecting Misinformation: Identifying False News Spread by Political Leaders in the Global South @Who? Investigating Possible Errors in Studies Linking Survey and Twitter Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1