Increasing brain-computer interface media depictions: pressing ethical concerns

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Brain-Computer Interfaces Pub Date : 2019-08-28 DOI:10.1080/2326263x.2019.1655837
Frederic Gilbert, C. Pham, J. Viaña, W. Gillam
{"title":"Increasing brain-computer interface media depictions: pressing ethical concerns","authors":"Frederic Gilbert, C. Pham, J. Viaña, W. Gillam","doi":"10.1080/2326263x.2019.1655837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are depicted in the English-speaking media, especially by news outlets. We use the FACTICA database to analyze depictions of BCIs from the first time the term appeared in the media (1993) up until 31 December 2017. We found a sample of over 4064 articles on BCIs. Results indicate that 76.91% of articles portrayed BCI positively, including 25.27% that were overly positive, while 26.64 % of the total articles contain claims about BCI-enabled enhancement. In contrast, 1.6% of articles had a negative tone and only 2.7% of articles flag issues explicitly related to ethical concerns surrounding BCI technology. We propose: 1) A proactive effort by the scientific community to push-out to the media stories focused on the limits and actual capabilities of BCIs, separating science from science fiction; 2) More influence should be brought to bear on the technological risks and process of informed consent.","PeriodicalId":45112,"journal":{"name":"Brain-Computer Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain-Computer Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263x.2019.1655837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This article explores how brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are depicted in the English-speaking media, especially by news outlets. We use the FACTICA database to analyze depictions of BCIs from the first time the term appeared in the media (1993) up until 31 December 2017. We found a sample of over 4064 articles on BCIs. Results indicate that 76.91% of articles portrayed BCI positively, including 25.27% that were overly positive, while 26.64 % of the total articles contain claims about BCI-enabled enhancement. In contrast, 1.6% of articles had a negative tone and only 2.7% of articles flag issues explicitly related to ethical concerns surrounding BCI technology. We propose: 1) A proactive effort by the scientific community to push-out to the media stories focused on the limits and actual capabilities of BCIs, separating science from science fiction; 2) More influence should be brought to bear on the technological risks and process of informed consent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越来越多的脑机接口媒体描述:紧迫的伦理问题
本文探讨了英语媒体,尤其是新闻媒体是如何描述脑机接口(BCI)的。我们使用FACTICA数据库分析了从该术语首次出现在媒体(1993年)到2017年12月31日对bci的描述。我们找到了超过4064篇关于bci的文章。结果表明,76.91%的文章对BCI进行了正面描述,其中25.27%的文章过于正面,而26.64%的文章包含了关于BCI增强的声明。相比之下,1.6%的文章带有负面基调,只有2.7%的文章明确指出了与BCI技术相关的道德问题。我们建议:1)科学界积极主动地向媒体推出关注脑机接口限制和实际能力的故事,将科学与科幻区分开来;2)对知情同意的技术风险和过程施加更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
A combined EEG motor and speech imagery paradigm with automated successive halving for customizable command selection Toward methodologies for motor imagery enhancement: a tDCS-BCI study Large scale investigation of the effect of gender on mu rhythm suppression in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces Genetic algorithm based deep learning model adaptation for improvising the motor imagery classification Real-time feedback improves imagined 3D primitive object classification from EEG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1