Effect of harvest date on barley grain contamination with Fusarium spp. and deoxynivalenol in northeastern Ontario

IF 0.3 4区 农林科学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Phytoprotection Pub Date : 2013-04-24 DOI:10.7202/1015205AR
A. Xue, J. Rowsell, K. Ho, Yuanhong Chen, D. Chi, A. Manceur, Zhang Shuzhen, C. Ren
{"title":"Effect of harvest date on barley grain contamination with Fusarium spp. and deoxynivalenol in northeastern Ontario","authors":"A. Xue, J. Rowsell, K. Ho, Yuanhong Chen, D. Chi, A. Manceur, Zhang Shuzhen, C. Ren","doi":"10.7202/1015205AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of harvest date on the incidence of seed-borne Fusarium spp. and deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was studied using three cultivars at three locations in Ontario in both 2004 and 2005. The profile of seed-borne Fusarium spp. was dominated by F. equiseti (Corda) Sacc., F. sporotrichioides Sherb., and F. poae (Peck) Wollenw., isolated from 4.4%, 3.3%, and 1.6% of the kernels, representing 39.3%, 29.4%, and 14.2% of the Fusarium pathogen population, respectively. Fusarium graminearum Schwabe and F. avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc. were each recovered from <1% of the kernels and represented 8.3% and 6.6% of the pathogen population, respectively. Other species, including F. acuminatum Ellis & Everh., F. culmorum (W.G. Sm.) Sacc., and F. semitectum Berk. & Rav., collectively occurred only on 0.2% of all kernels and represented <2% of the population. The incidence level of all Fusarium spp. increased from 6.9 to 13.9% when harvest was delayed. Of the commonly recovered species, only F. avenaceum and F. sporotrichioides levels increased with the delayed harvest, while other species did not follow a clear pattern. DON concentration in the harvested grain ranged from 0.20 to 0.28 mg kg‑1 with the five harvest dates, and was not statistically different. Significant differences in the incidence of all Fusarium spp. and in DON concentration were observed among cultivars, locations, and between the 2 yr of the study. The highest DON concentration observed in this study was 0.5 mg kg‑1, which is below the Canadian tolerance level of 1.0 mg kg‑1.","PeriodicalId":49693,"journal":{"name":"Phytoprotection","volume":"457 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytoprotection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1015205AR","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The effect of harvest date on the incidence of seed-borne Fusarium spp. and deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was studied using three cultivars at three locations in Ontario in both 2004 and 2005. The profile of seed-borne Fusarium spp. was dominated by F. equiseti (Corda) Sacc., F. sporotrichioides Sherb., and F. poae (Peck) Wollenw., isolated from 4.4%, 3.3%, and 1.6% of the kernels, representing 39.3%, 29.4%, and 14.2% of the Fusarium pathogen population, respectively. Fusarium graminearum Schwabe and F. avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc. were each recovered from <1% of the kernels and represented 8.3% and 6.6% of the pathogen population, respectively. Other species, including F. acuminatum Ellis & Everh., F. culmorum (W.G. Sm.) Sacc., and F. semitectum Berk. & Rav., collectively occurred only on 0.2% of all kernels and represented <2% of the population. The incidence level of all Fusarium spp. increased from 6.9 to 13.9% when harvest was delayed. Of the commonly recovered species, only F. avenaceum and F. sporotrichioides levels increased with the delayed harvest, while other species did not follow a clear pattern. DON concentration in the harvested grain ranged from 0.20 to 0.28 mg kg‑1 with the five harvest dates, and was not statistically different. Significant differences in the incidence of all Fusarium spp. and in DON concentration were observed among cultivars, locations, and between the 2 yr of the study. The highest DON concentration observed in this study was 0.5 mg kg‑1, which is below the Canadian tolerance level of 1.0 mg kg‑1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收获日期对安大略东北部大麦镰刀菌和脱氧雪腐镰刀菌醇污染的影响
2004年和2005年在安大略省3个地点研究了收获日期对大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)种传镰刀菌病发病率和脱氧雪腐镰刀菌醇(DON)浓度的影响。种子传镰刀菌的分布以镰孢镰刀菌(F. equiseti (Corda) Sacc)为主。芽孢杆菌;和F. poae (Peck) Wollenw。,分别为4.4%、3.3%和1.6%,分别占总致病菌群体的39.3%、29.4%和14.2%。禾谷镰刀菌和禾谷镰刀菌(Fr.) Sacc。分别占总病原菌总数的8.3%和6.6%,回收率均小于1%。其他物种,包括F. acuminatum Ellis & Everh。, F. culmorum (w.g.m.)Sacc。和半乳F. Berk。&雷夫。,总共只出现在所有谷粒的0.2%上,占总数量的<2%。延迟收获后,所有镰刀菌的发病率由6.9%上升到13.9%。在通常恢复的物种中,只有avenaceum和sporotrichioides的水平随着采收的延迟而增加,而其他物种则没有明显的规律。5个收获期籽粒DON浓度变化范围为0.20 ~ 0.28 mg kg - 1,差异无统计学意义。所有镰刀菌的发病率和DON浓度在不同的品种、地点和研究的2年内都有显著差异。本研究中观察到的最高DON浓度为0.5 mg kg - 1,低于加拿大的耐受水平1.0 mg kg - 1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Phytoprotection
Phytoprotection 生物-植物科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Le virus des feuilles jaunes en cuillère de la tomate favorise la tolérance au stress de la sécheresse de Solanum lycopersicum L. Revue documentaire et nouvelles perspectives de l’anatomie du bois aidant à mieux comprendre et lutter contre le flétrissement du chêne Utilisation de la crotalaire, Crotalaria juncea, comme engrais vert pour la gestion des nématodes phytoparasites de la carotte en sol organique Évaluation des effets d’un pesticide d’origine végétale sur Tetranychus urticae, Botrytis cinerea et Bombus impatiens Chemical composition, antioxidant and allelopathic activities of essential oils and crude extracts of Cupressus arizonica Greene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1