Self-directed Learning (SDL) of Medication Safety Issues by Using a Dual Function (Educational & Supervisory) Checklist in Clinical Settings

S. Razavi, F. Mousavi, Termeh Tarjoman, Marjan Mohammadnouri, P. Shojaei
{"title":"Self-directed Learning (SDL) of Medication Safety Issues by Using a Dual Function (Educational & Supervisory) Checklist in Clinical Settings","authors":"S. Razavi, F. Mousavi, Termeh Tarjoman, Marjan Mohammadnouri, P. Shojaei","doi":"10.5812/JCRPS.102927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Main goal in this study was to design and introduce a standard checklist that medical interns to be able to apply it to assess the medication safety status in clinical settings and learn the facts related to this issue simultaneously. Methods: We performed the following steps to conduct the study: (1) using brainstorming and fishbone method for collecting problems in six domains including: demographic and risk factors, prescribing, transcribing, usage, storage and management; (2) collecting the medication standards and indicators; (3) designing a problem oriented checklist, including 85 questions; (4) verifying the validity and reliability of designed checklist by Delphi method and conducting a pilot study. The Cronbach's alpha co efficient were good (more than0.7); (5) to perform of pretest; (6) teaching and introducing of 10 valid evidences to answer the checklist questions in three day workshop to 41 medical interns; (7) after the workshop, students applied the mentioned checklist for assessment of drug safety status on 151 hospitalized patients with the aim of learning during assessment; (8) monitoring of patient’s medication safety status by the interns and self -learning simultaneously; and finally (9) we used Student self-assessment of medication safety education goals, before and after self-training with our checklists. Results: A standard checklist with dual functions (self-learning during assessment) was developed. Difference between pre-test and post test scores was statistical significant (P ≤ 0.001) and 92% of participants were satisfied with this type of training. Conclusions: We recommend our designed checklist to all clinical educators who are engaged in medication safety domain.","PeriodicalId":15586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/JCRPS.102927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Main goal in this study was to design and introduce a standard checklist that medical interns to be able to apply it to assess the medication safety status in clinical settings and learn the facts related to this issue simultaneously. Methods: We performed the following steps to conduct the study: (1) using brainstorming and fishbone method for collecting problems in six domains including: demographic and risk factors, prescribing, transcribing, usage, storage and management; (2) collecting the medication standards and indicators; (3) designing a problem oriented checklist, including 85 questions; (4) verifying the validity and reliability of designed checklist by Delphi method and conducting a pilot study. The Cronbach's alpha co efficient were good (more than0.7); (5) to perform of pretest; (6) teaching and introducing of 10 valid evidences to answer the checklist questions in three day workshop to 41 medical interns; (7) after the workshop, students applied the mentioned checklist for assessment of drug safety status on 151 hospitalized patients with the aim of learning during assessment; (8) monitoring of patient’s medication safety status by the interns and self -learning simultaneously; and finally (9) we used Student self-assessment of medication safety education goals, before and after self-training with our checklists. Results: A standard checklist with dual functions (self-learning during assessment) was developed. Difference between pre-test and post test scores was statistical significant (P ≤ 0.001) and 92% of participants were satisfied with this type of training. Conclusions: We recommend our designed checklist to all clinical educators who are engaged in medication safety domain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床环境中使用双重功能(教育和监督)检查表进行药物安全问题的自主学习(SDL)
目的:本研究的主要目的是设计并引入一份标准的检查表,使实习医生能够应用它来评估临床环境中的用药安全状况,同时了解与此问题相关的事实。方法:(1)采用头脑风暴法和鱼骨法收集人口统计学和危险因素、处方、转录、使用、储存和管理等6个领域的问题;(2)收集用药标准和指标;(3)设计以问题为导向的清单,共85个问题;(4)采用德尔菲法对设计的检查表进行效度和信度验证,并进行初步研究。Cronbach’s α系数较好(大于0.7);(五)进行预试;(6)对41名实习医师进行为期3天的培训,并引入10个有效证据来回答检查表问题;(7)研修班结束后,学员们将上述清单应用于151例住院患者的药品安全状况评估,目的是在评估中学习;(8)实习生对患者用药安全状况的监测与自我学习同步进行;最后(9)采用学生自我评估药物安全教育目标,在自我培训前后使用我们的清单进行自我评估。结果:制定了具有双重功能的标准检查表(在评估中自我学习)。测试前和测试后得分的差异有统计学意义(P≤0.001),92%的参与者对这种类型的训练感到满意。结论:我们向所有从事药物安全领域的临床教育工作者推荐我们设计的检查表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Eight Weeks of Aerobic Exercise and Garlic Extract Use on the Blood Pressure, Fat Percentage, and Lipid Profile of Patients with Hypertension Effects of Exercise Training Intensity on Plasma Levels of Creatinine Kinas After a Myocardial Infarction in Male Wistar Rats Designing a Conceptual Pattern of E- Learning for Iran’s Universities of Medical Sciences Evaluating the Effectiveness of Self-regulation Strategy Training on Procrastination, Happiness and Academic Achievement Improving the Performance of Hospital Information Systems Using Six Sigma for Kermanshah Province Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1