Pressure Ulcers: Developing Clinical Indicators in Evidence-based Practice. A Prospective Study

K. Tsaras, M. Chatzi, C. Kleisiaris, E. Fradelos, L. Kourkouta, I. Papathanasiou
{"title":"Pressure Ulcers: Developing Clinical Indicators in Evidence-based Practice. A Prospective Study","authors":"K. Tsaras, M. Chatzi, C. Kleisiaris, E. Fradelos, L. Kourkouta, I. Papathanasiou","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2016.70.379-383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and objectives: It is widely recognized that Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients have a greater likelihood of developing pressure ulcers in comparison to hospital or home care patients. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate whether specific clinical characteristics could be used as clinical indicators towards pressure ulcers prevention. Method: We monitored 210 hospitalized ICU patients during a 12-month period. Pressure ulcers were assessed following the current guidelines. Clinical characteristics such as gender, age, hospitalized days, hemodialysis treatment, hematocrit, and serum albumin levels were considered as the most common predictors for pressure ulcers development. The significance of associations was controlled using multiple logistic regression after adjusting for clinical characteristics and was presented as adjusted odds ratio (AOR). Results: The prevalence of pressure ulcers was 24.3%. Logistic regression revealed that patients with increased age AOR=1.04; (CI: 1.01-1.07) and last-long hospitalization AOR=1.17; (CI: 1.11-1.23) were significantly more likely to present pressure ulcers compared to the younger ones and patients with less length of stay, respectively. We also found that patients under hemodialysis treatment were more likely to present pressure ulcers AOR=4.09; (CI: 1.12-14.98) compared to patients that did not underwent hemodialysis and the risk of pressure ulcers development was decreased by 9% for every single unit of hematocrit value increase AOR=0.91; (CI: 0.82-0.99). Conclusion: Our data analysis confirms that the clinical characteristics that were studied are independently associated with pressure ulcers development, and therefore, it is a crucial incentive to consider that these specific clinical characteristics are important indicators in the evidence-based practice.","PeriodicalId":18414,"journal":{"name":"Medical Archives","volume":"1 1","pages":"379 - 383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.379-383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Aims and objectives: It is widely recognized that Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients have a greater likelihood of developing pressure ulcers in comparison to hospital or home care patients. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate whether specific clinical characteristics could be used as clinical indicators towards pressure ulcers prevention. Method: We monitored 210 hospitalized ICU patients during a 12-month period. Pressure ulcers were assessed following the current guidelines. Clinical characteristics such as gender, age, hospitalized days, hemodialysis treatment, hematocrit, and serum albumin levels were considered as the most common predictors for pressure ulcers development. The significance of associations was controlled using multiple logistic regression after adjusting for clinical characteristics and was presented as adjusted odds ratio (AOR). Results: The prevalence of pressure ulcers was 24.3%. Logistic regression revealed that patients with increased age AOR=1.04; (CI: 1.01-1.07) and last-long hospitalization AOR=1.17; (CI: 1.11-1.23) were significantly more likely to present pressure ulcers compared to the younger ones and patients with less length of stay, respectively. We also found that patients under hemodialysis treatment were more likely to present pressure ulcers AOR=4.09; (CI: 1.12-14.98) compared to patients that did not underwent hemodialysis and the risk of pressure ulcers development was decreased by 9% for every single unit of hematocrit value increase AOR=0.91; (CI: 0.82-0.99). Conclusion: Our data analysis confirms that the clinical characteristics that were studied are independently associated with pressure ulcers development, and therefore, it is a crucial incentive to consider that these specific clinical characteristics are important indicators in the evidence-based practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
压疮:在循证实践中发展临床指标。前瞻性研究
目的和目的:人们普遍认为,与医院或家庭护理患者相比,重症监护病房(ICU)患者发生压疮的可能性更大。因此,本研究旨在评估特定的临床特征是否可以作为预防压疮的临床指标。方法:对210例ICU住院患者进行为期12个月的监护。压疮是按照现行指南进行评估的。临床特征,如性别、年龄、住院天数、血液透析治疗、红细胞压积和血清白蛋白水平被认为是压疮发展的最常见预测因素。在调整临床特征后,使用多重逻辑回归控制相关性的显著性,并以调整优势比(AOR)表示。结果:压疮患病率为24.3%。Logistic回归显示,年龄增加患者AOR=1.04;(CI: 1.01 ~ 1.07),最后住院时间AOR=1.17;(CI: 1.11-1.23)分别比年轻患者和住院时间较短的患者更容易出现压疮。我们还发现,接受血液透析治疗的患者更容易出现压疮(AOR=4.09);(CI: 1.12-14.98)与未进行血液透析的患者相比,每增加一个单位的红细胞压积值,压疮发生的风险降低9% (AOR=0.91);(置信区间:0.82—-0.99)。结论:我们的数据分析证实,所研究的临床特征与压疮的发展独立相关,因此,考虑这些特定的临床特征是循证实践中的重要指标是一个至关重要的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Attitude of Children with Special Needs in The Learning Process Hemangioma–Benign Tumor in Childhood Historical Background of Medical Informatics Development Atypical Presentation of Erythema Nodosum Following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Hypothyroidism and Subclinical Hypothyroidism as a Consequence of COVID-19 Infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1