Summaries of papers read at the meeting of the Society for Social Medicine 16 to 18 September 1976

{"title":"Summaries of papers read at the meeting of the Society for Social Medicine 16 to 18 September 1976","authors":"","doi":"10.1136/jech.31.1.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the decade 1960-69, 33 871 mothers in Newcastle upon Tyne were booked for delivery either in specialist hospitals or at home. Confinements in hospital rose from 45% in 1960-62 to 80% in 1966-69 and at the same time perinatal mortality fell from 36 to 26 per 1000 births. While home bookings fell from 51 % to 23 %, the proportion ofwomen so booked who were eventually transferred to hospital, rose from 13% to 21%. Perinatal mortality from 'obstetrical' causes fell at a greater rate than those from 'environmental' causes. Cases transferred from home to hospital showed a high mortality, which fell steeply from 128 (1960-62) to 54 (1966-69) per 1000 births. There is evidence of improved selection both at booking and at transfer, which probably accounts for the fall in the mortality rate among home deliveries. The above findings cannot be explained by changes in the distribution of social class, parity, age, maternal height, or birth weight nor by selective migration from the city.","PeriodicalId":75622,"journal":{"name":"British journal of preventive & social medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"67 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of preventive & social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.31.1.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the decade 1960-69, 33 871 mothers in Newcastle upon Tyne were booked for delivery either in specialist hospitals or at home. Confinements in hospital rose from 45% in 1960-62 to 80% in 1966-69 and at the same time perinatal mortality fell from 36 to 26 per 1000 births. While home bookings fell from 51 % to 23 %, the proportion ofwomen so booked who were eventually transferred to hospital, rose from 13% to 21%. Perinatal mortality from 'obstetrical' causes fell at a greater rate than those from 'environmental' causes. Cases transferred from home to hospital showed a high mortality, which fell steeply from 128 (1960-62) to 54 (1966-69) per 1000 births. There is evidence of improved selection both at booking and at transfer, which probably accounts for the fall in the mortality rate among home deliveries. The above findings cannot be explained by changes in the distribution of social class, parity, age, maternal height, or birth weight nor by selective migration from the city.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1976年9月16日至18日社会医学学会会议上宣读的论文摘要
在1960年至1969年的十年间,泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔有33871名母亲预定在专科医院或在家分娩。住院分娩率从1960-62年的45%上升到1966-69年的80%,同时围产期死亡率从每1000例分娩36例下降到26例。虽然家庭预约率从51%下降到23%,但最终转到医院的女性比例从13%上升到21%。因“产科”原因导致的围产期死亡率比因“环境”原因导致的围产期死亡率下降得更快。从家庭转到医院的病例显示出很高的死亡率,从每1000个新生儿的128例(1960- 1962年)急剧下降到54例(1966- 1969年)。有证据表明,预约和转产的选择都有所改善,这可能是在家分娩死亡率下降的原因。上述发现不能用社会阶层、胎次、年龄、母亲身高或出生体重分布的变化来解释,也不能用城市的选择性迁移来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The hazard of old lead mines in Wales. Cleft lip and palate in the Oxford area. An examination of the evidence for clustering in space and time. Smoking in pregnancy and low weight babies: a statistical consideration. Primary medical--whose responsibility? Perceived illness and its treatment. A naturalistic study in social medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1