Sand Erosion Mitigation for Offshore Pipeline and Riser – Erosion Prediction by Computational Fluid Dynamic CFD Analysis and Experimental Testing

I. Putra, Tan Chin Chien, M. Badaruddin, M. Isa, Cheong Xiang Hou, Liu Dongjie, Sun Dalin
{"title":"Sand Erosion Mitigation for Offshore Pipeline and Riser – Erosion Prediction by Computational Fluid Dynamic CFD Analysis and Experimental Testing","authors":"I. Putra, Tan Chin Chien, M. Badaruddin, M. Isa, Cheong Xiang Hou, Liu Dongjie, Sun Dalin","doi":"10.4043/31451-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Late life production of oil & gas facilities are faced with significant challenge especially when sand is produced along with the production fluid. It can cause premature failure of the equipment, for example piping and pipeline. Mitigation by adding sand removal facility is limited by space, available load, and handling at satellite wellhead platform. It also introduced additional pressure drop which limit the production that already in low pressure. One of the measures to mitigate sand erosion issue for the offshore pipeline and riser is by flow assurance, to reduce the flow velocity so that the sand velocity will be less than the erosional velocity. This mitigation comes with drawback where reducing velocity will require bigger size pipeline, higher cost, and introduce higher liquid dropout along the pipeline which will create severe slugging issue in the pipeline. Next mitigation can be done by increasing bend radius along the pipeline, to reduce impact angle of the sand to the internal surface of the pipeline. Last mitigation will be increasing resistance of the material to the sand erosion. Combination of those methodology is required to achieve the most optimum solution to mitigate sand erosion. This paper present sand erosion mitigation on one of the existing pipeline replacement projects in PETRONAS by application of unbonded flexible pipe. Modeling of the of the erosion due to sand particle solution in the pipeline was done using computational fluid dynamic finite element analysis simulation. Experimental test with samples positioned at various orientation of the riser bend location were also investigated. Concerning the exceptional balance between results efficiency and simulation time, a grid sensitivity test has also been included. Various parameters were used to verify the sensitivity of the simulation including materials properties for various fluid composition data obtained from production forecast and fluid velocity as modeled in the pipeline steady state hydraulic analysis and transient flow assurance analysis. As result, the thickness of internal carcass is found sufficient to withstand the erosion threat generated by sand particles for the entire design life of the pipeline. The results obtained from finite element analysis and erosion experimental test were then correlated, and the comparison were illustrated in graph of velocity against erosion rate for each of sand concentration. The result of the modeling and experimental testing may improve prediction model of the sand erosion in the offshore pipeline especially for flexible pipeline and riser application.","PeriodicalId":11011,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31451-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Late life production of oil & gas facilities are faced with significant challenge especially when sand is produced along with the production fluid. It can cause premature failure of the equipment, for example piping and pipeline. Mitigation by adding sand removal facility is limited by space, available load, and handling at satellite wellhead platform. It also introduced additional pressure drop which limit the production that already in low pressure. One of the measures to mitigate sand erosion issue for the offshore pipeline and riser is by flow assurance, to reduce the flow velocity so that the sand velocity will be less than the erosional velocity. This mitigation comes with drawback where reducing velocity will require bigger size pipeline, higher cost, and introduce higher liquid dropout along the pipeline which will create severe slugging issue in the pipeline. Next mitigation can be done by increasing bend radius along the pipeline, to reduce impact angle of the sand to the internal surface of the pipeline. Last mitigation will be increasing resistance of the material to the sand erosion. Combination of those methodology is required to achieve the most optimum solution to mitigate sand erosion. This paper present sand erosion mitigation on one of the existing pipeline replacement projects in PETRONAS by application of unbonded flexible pipe. Modeling of the of the erosion due to sand particle solution in the pipeline was done using computational fluid dynamic finite element analysis simulation. Experimental test with samples positioned at various orientation of the riser bend location were also investigated. Concerning the exceptional balance between results efficiency and simulation time, a grid sensitivity test has also been included. Various parameters were used to verify the sensitivity of the simulation including materials properties for various fluid composition data obtained from production forecast and fluid velocity as modeled in the pipeline steady state hydraulic analysis and transient flow assurance analysis. As result, the thickness of internal carcass is found sufficient to withstand the erosion threat generated by sand particles for the entire design life of the pipeline. The results obtained from finite element analysis and erosion experimental test were then correlated, and the comparison were illustrated in graph of velocity against erosion rate for each of sand concentration. The result of the modeling and experimental testing may improve prediction model of the sand erosion in the offshore pipeline especially for flexible pipeline and riser application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海洋管道和隔水管的减沙——基于计算流体动力学CFD分析和实验测试的减沙预测
油气设施的后期生产面临着巨大的挑战,特别是当出砂随生产液一起排出时。它可能导致设备的过早失效,例如管道和管道。增加除砂设施的缓解措施受到空间、可用载荷和卫星井口平台处理能力的限制。它还引入了额外的压降,限制了已经处于低压状态的产量。缓解海上管道和隔水管砂蚀问题的措施之一是通过流动保证,降低流速,使出砂速度小于侵蚀速度。这种缓解措施也有缺点,降低速度需要更大的管道尺寸,更高的成本,并且沿着管道会产生更高的液差,从而在管道中产生严重的段塞问题。下一步可以通过增加管道弯曲半径来减小砂体对管道内表面的冲击角度。最后的缓解措施是增加材料对沙蚀的抵抗力。需要将这些方法结合起来,以获得减轻砂石侵蚀的最佳解决方案。本文介绍了在马来西亚国家石油公司(PETRONAS)现有的一个管道更换项目中,应用无粘结柔性管来缓解砂蚀。采用计算流体力学有限元分析方法,对管道内砂粒溶液的侵蚀过程进行了模拟。在立管弯曲位置的不同方向进行了实验试验。考虑到结果效率和模拟时间之间的特殊平衡,还包括网格灵敏度测试。在管道稳态水力分析和瞬态流动保证分析中,利用各种参数验证了模拟的敏感性,包括从生产预测中获得的各种流体成分数据的材料特性和流体速度。结果表明,在管道的整个设计寿命期内,内胎体厚度足以承受砂粒的侵蚀威胁。将有限元分析结果与冲蚀试验结果进行对比,并绘制出不同砂浓度下流速与冲蚀速率的对比图。模拟和试验结果对海上管道特别是柔性管道和隔水管的砂蚀预测模型有一定的改进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Advance Petrophysical Evaluation for Heterolithic Clastics Reservoir Characterization Optimization in Malay Basin The Transformation Journey and Key Critical Success Factors of Turbomachinery Digital Remote Monitoring Biggest Wells Plug and Abandonment Campaign – Effective Management & Best Practices Implementation Zawtika Deferment Management Enhancement: A Systematic Way to Unlock Gas Potential for Optimized Operations Breakthrough Integration of 3-1/2? Tubing in 8-1/2? Hole Cemented Monobore for Successful Tubing Stem Test TST
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1