Internal Auditors' Perceptions of Information Technology-Related Risks: A Comparison Between General Auditors and Information Technology Auditors

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS European Journal of Information Systems Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.2308/isys-2020-040
A. Nuijten, M. Keil, Bert Zwiers
{"title":"Internal Auditors' Perceptions of Information Technology-Related Risks: A Comparison Between General Auditors and Information Technology Auditors","authors":"A. Nuijten, M. Keil, Bert Zwiers","doi":"10.2308/isys-2020-040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing role of Information Technology (IT), many organizations have incorporated IT governance practices that include keeping executives apprised of IT risks. To perform this function, organizations rely upon their internal audit staff to obtain an independent evaluation of IT risks. While both general auditors and IT auditors are involved in assessing IT risks, they may not be equally adept at identifying such risks.  We draw on the expert vs non-expert perspective to understand how general auditors and IT auditors perceive IT risks differently. Through a quasi-experiment with 70 internal auditors of a financial institution, we found that general auditors perceived IT risks to be lower than their IT audit colleagues. We also found that personal risk preferences influenced the level of IT risks that general auditors perceived. Personal risk preferences did not affect the risk perceptions of IT auditors. Implications for both research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":50486,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2020-040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the growing role of Information Technology (IT), many organizations have incorporated IT governance practices that include keeping executives apprised of IT risks. To perform this function, organizations rely upon their internal audit staff to obtain an independent evaluation of IT risks. While both general auditors and IT auditors are involved in assessing IT risks, they may not be equally adept at identifying such risks.  We draw on the expert vs non-expert perspective to understand how general auditors and IT auditors perceive IT risks differently. Through a quasi-experiment with 70 internal auditors of a financial institution, we found that general auditors perceived IT risks to be lower than their IT audit colleagues. We also found that personal risk preferences influenced the level of IT risks that general auditors perceived. Personal risk preferences did not affect the risk perceptions of IT auditors. Implications for both research and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部审计师对信息技术相关风险的认知:普通审计师与信息技术审计师的比较
随着信息技术(IT)的作用越来越大,许多组织已经合并了IT治理实践,其中包括让管理人员了解IT风险。为了履行这一职能,组织依靠其内部审计人员获得对IT风险的独立评估。虽然一般审计员和IT审计员都参与评估IT风险,但他们在识别此类风险方面可能并不同样熟练。我们利用专家与非专家的观点来理解一般审计员和IT审计员如何以不同的方式看待IT风险。通过对某金融机构70名内部审计师的准实验,我们发现普通审计师对IT风险的感知低于其IT审计同事。我们还发现,个人风险偏好影响一般审计师感知的IT风险水平。个人风险偏好不影响IT审计人员的风险感知。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Information Systems
European Journal of Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Information Systems offers a unique European perspective on the theory and practice of information systems for a global readership. We actively seek first-rate articles that offer a critical examination of information technology, covering its effects, development, implementation, strategy, management, and policy.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling motivational configurations in shaping meaningful engagement in green gamification Determinants of gamification effectiveness: perspectives of technology affordances and coping responses in the context of team-based gamified training Examining the impact of mobile gambling harm minimisation features: a dualistic model of passion perspective Achieving strategic alignment between business and information technology with information technology governance: the role of commitment to principles and Top Leadership Support Reducing the incidence of biased algorithmic decisions through feature importance transparency: an empirical study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1