Capture γ-Ray Dose Equivalent at Double-Bend Maze Entrance; Monte Carlo Simulation and Analytical Methods and Measurements

Q3 Health Professions Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11508
Reza Eghdam-Zamiri, Hosein Ghiasi
{"title":"Capture γ-Ray Dose Equivalent at Double-Bend Maze Entrance; Monte Carlo Simulation and Analytical Methods and Measurements","authors":"Reza Eghdam-Zamiri, Hosein Ghiasi","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The production of the secondary neutron in the high-energy megavoltage medical accelerator machines has been extensively studied. In this study, MCNP5 MC code and two analytical methods, the proposed method and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 47 proposed method were used to capture γ-ray dose equivalent calculation. \nMaterials and Methods: MCNP5 code of the MC simulation method was used for code calculation in this study. The main components of a Varian 2100Clinac were simulated as well as a 30×30×30 cm3 water phantom, in a Source to Surface Distance (SSD) of 100cm. Apparent neutron source strength (QN) was obtained using F1, *F8 tallies, and a small scoring cell at the isocenter with a mass equal to 0.625g. \nResults: QN was obtained as 1.25 n/Gy X for the simulated Linear Accelerators )linac( head and was used in the other calculations. In the simulated double-bend maze treatment room with first and second lengths of the maze as 7m and 3m, the proposed method calculated capture γ-ray dose with 6.2% and 60% differences compared with MC simulation and IAEA 47 methods, respectively. \nConclusion: We concluded that Ghiasi and Mesbahi's proposed method performed better in capturing γ-ray dose equivalent calculation compared to IAEA 47 report. The proposed method reduced the difference from 60% to 6.2%.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The production of the secondary neutron in the high-energy megavoltage medical accelerator machines has been extensively studied. In this study, MCNP5 MC code and two analytical methods, the proposed method and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 47 proposed method were used to capture γ-ray dose equivalent calculation. Materials and Methods: MCNP5 code of the MC simulation method was used for code calculation in this study. The main components of a Varian 2100Clinac were simulated as well as a 30×30×30 cm3 water phantom, in a Source to Surface Distance (SSD) of 100cm. Apparent neutron source strength (QN) was obtained using F1, *F8 tallies, and a small scoring cell at the isocenter with a mass equal to 0.625g. Results: QN was obtained as 1.25 n/Gy X for the simulated Linear Accelerators )linac( head and was used in the other calculations. In the simulated double-bend maze treatment room with first and second lengths of the maze as 7m and 3m, the proposed method calculated capture γ-ray dose with 6.2% and 60% differences compared with MC simulation and IAEA 47 methods, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that Ghiasi and Mesbahi's proposed method performed better in capturing γ-ray dose equivalent calculation compared to IAEA 47 report. The proposed method reduced the difference from 60% to 6.2%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双弯迷宫入口捕获γ射线剂量当量蒙特卡罗模拟与分析方法与测量
目的:对高能超高电压医用加速器中二次中子的产生进行了广泛的研究。在本研究中,MCNP5 MC代码和两种解析方法,即国际原子能机构(IAEA) 47提出的方法分别用于捕获γ射线剂量当量的计算。材料与方法:本研究采用MC模拟法的MCNP5代码进行代码计算。模拟了瓦里安2100Clinac的主要部件以及30×30×30 cm3水模体,源到表面距离(SSD)为100cm。利用F1, *F8计数和质量为0.625g的等中心小记分池获得中子源的表观强度(QN)。结果:模拟直线加速器直线头的QN为1.25 n/Gy X,并用于其他计算。在第一段和第二段迷宫长度分别为7m和3m的模拟双弯迷宫治疗室中,与MC模拟和IAEA 47方法相比,本文方法计算的捕获γ射线剂量分别相差6.2%和60%。结论:Ghiasi和Mesbahi提出的方法在捕获γ射线剂量当量计算方面优于IAEA 47报告。该方法将差异从60%减小到6.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
AI in Nuclear Medical Applications: Challenges and Opportunities Evaluation of Eye-Blinking Dynamics in Human Emotion Recognition Using Weighted Visibility Graph Assessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOCAssessment of SPECT Image Reconstruction in Liver Scanning Using 99mTc/ EDDA/ HYNIC-TOC Analysis of the Prevalence of Lumbar Annular Tears in Adult Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Grading the Dominant Pathological Indices in Liver Diseases from Pathological Images Using Radiomics Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1