Comparison of Risk Scores for the Prediction of Outcomes after Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

{"title":"Comparison of Risk Scores for the Prediction of Outcomes after Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection","authors":"","doi":"10.36879/jcr.19.000122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the performance of four existing risk models and a newly developed risk score for type A acute aortic dissection surgery. In 327\nconsecutives with type A aortic dissection surgery patients during 2003/03-2017/03 at our centre, operative mortality occurred in 65 (19.9%).\nIndependent predictors of operative mortality were critical pre-operative state and malperfusion syndrome, and a novel additive “CritMal” Score\nwas constructed from this. C-statistics (95% confidence interval) for operative mortality were EuroSCORE 0.60 (0.52-0.67), EuroSCORE II 0.64\n(0.57-0.72), Rampoldi 0.68 (0.59-0.76), Leontyev 0.56 (0.48-0.64), and CritMal 0.72 (0.64-0.80) respectively. This is the first study externally\nassessing surgical scores for aortic dissection surgery, with modest accuracy for all and moderate for CritMal. There is room for improvement of\nthese risk models, and further refinements and external validation are warranted for clinical application.","PeriodicalId":15200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36879/jcr.19.000122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the performance of four existing risk models and a newly developed risk score for type A acute aortic dissection surgery. In 327 consecutives with type A aortic dissection surgery patients during 2003/03-2017/03 at our centre, operative mortality occurred in 65 (19.9%). Independent predictors of operative mortality were critical pre-operative state and malperfusion syndrome, and a novel additive “CritMal” Score was constructed from this. C-statistics (95% confidence interval) for operative mortality were EuroSCORE 0.60 (0.52-0.67), EuroSCORE II 0.64 (0.57-0.72), Rampoldi 0.68 (0.59-0.76), Leontyev 0.56 (0.48-0.64), and CritMal 0.72 (0.64-0.80) respectively. This is the first study externally assessing surgical scores for aortic dissection surgery, with modest accuracy for all and moderate for CritMal. There is room for improvement of these risk models, and further refinements and external validation are warranted for clinical application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性A型主动脉夹层术后预后的风险评分比较
我们比较了四种现有风险模型和新开发的a型急性主动脉夹层手术风险评分的表现。2003/03-2017/03年在我院连续327例A型主动脉夹层手术患者中,65例(19.9%)发生手术死亡率。手术死亡率的独立预测因子是临界术前状态和灌注不良综合征,并由此构建了一种新的附加性“临界”评分。手术死亡率的c -统计值(95%可信区间)分别为EuroSCORE 0.60(0.52-0.67)、EuroSCORE II 0.64(0.57-0.72)、Rampoldi 0.68(0.59-0.76)、Leontyev 0.56(0.48-0.64)、CritMal 0.72(0.64-0.80)。这是第一个对主动脉夹层手术评分进行外部评估的研究,对所有人的准确性中等,对CritMal的准确性中等。这些风险模型还有改进的空间,临床应用需要进一步的改进和外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of delirium in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery AL amyloidosis masquerading as cardiac syncope: a case report Etiological profile of acute pericarditis at the Yalgado-Ouedraogo university hospital in Ouagadougou at Burkina Faso Pilot experience with VV ECLS in a single hospital in a developing nation COVID 19 infection requiring ECMO support after Fontan operation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1