Being seen: The lived experience of psychodynamic practitioners disclosing or not disclosing sight impairment

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.1080/13642537.2022.2156132
Laura Evers
{"title":"Being seen: The lived experience of psychodynamic practitioners disclosing or not disclosing sight impairment","authors":"Laura Evers","doi":"10.1080/13642537.2022.2156132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The taboo of therapist self-disclosure and literature addressing disclosure and disability issues from a psychodynamic perspective is explored. Research on disclosure decisions among physically impaired practitioners is limited. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis qualitative research methodology was employed to understand the lived experience of psychodynamic practitioners with sight impairment to understand disclosure decision-making processes in a therapeutic setting. Six participants self-identified as sight impaired psychodynamic practitioners and were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Findings showed that the experience of working as a practitioner with sight impairment is a tenacious endeavour, requiring high levels of self-awareness and determination in navigating the minefield of self-disclosure, daring to be seen by others, holding the patient’s need to be seen and journeying through loss and acceptance of the changing self. Results showed that there is an inverse relationship between likelihood to self-disclose sight impairment and the extent to which practitioners work with unconscious process and transference. Ultimately, the capacity to reclaim disavowed parts of the self, defined therapists’ ability to make therapeutic disclosure decisions. Suggestions for future research, clinical and ethical implications are provided plus recommendations for impaired practitioners and those who work with difference.","PeriodicalId":44564,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","volume":"78 1","pages":"60 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2022.2156132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The taboo of therapist self-disclosure and literature addressing disclosure and disability issues from a psychodynamic perspective is explored. Research on disclosure decisions among physically impaired practitioners is limited. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis qualitative research methodology was employed to understand the lived experience of psychodynamic practitioners with sight impairment to understand disclosure decision-making processes in a therapeutic setting. Six participants self-identified as sight impaired psychodynamic practitioners and were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Findings showed that the experience of working as a practitioner with sight impairment is a tenacious endeavour, requiring high levels of self-awareness and determination in navigating the minefield of self-disclosure, daring to be seen by others, holding the patient’s need to be seen and journeying through loss and acceptance of the changing self. Results showed that there is an inverse relationship between likelihood to self-disclose sight impairment and the extent to which practitioners work with unconscious process and transference. Ultimately, the capacity to reclaim disavowed parts of the self, defined therapists’ ability to make therapeutic disclosure decisions. Suggestions for future research, clinical and ethical implications are provided plus recommendations for impaired practitioners and those who work with difference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被看见:心理动力学从业者披露或不披露视力障碍的生活经验
摘要:本文探讨了治疗师自我表露的禁忌,以及从心理动力学角度探讨自我表露与残疾问题的文献。对身体有缺陷的从业人员披露决定的研究是有限的。本研究采用解释性现象学分析定性研究方法,了解视障心理动力学从业者的生活经验,以了解治疗环境下的披露决策过程。六名自我认定为视障心理动力学从业者的参与者使用半结构化问卷进行了访谈。研究结果表明,作为一名视力受损的医生,工作经历是一项顽强的努力,需要高度的自我意识和决心,在自我表露的雷区中穿行,敢于被别人看到,满足病人被看到的需要,经历失去和接受改变的自我的旅程。结果表明,自我披露视力障碍的可能性与从业人员无意识过程和移情的程度呈反比关系。最终,收回自我中被否认的部分的能力,决定了治疗师做出治疗披露决定的能力。对未来的研究、临床和伦理影响提出了建议,并为残疾从业者和那些与差异工作的人提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Travelling in time: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to examine temporal aspects of the personal experience of issues in health and well-being Towards a psychotherapy publishing ethics concordat Reading with love: Developing therapeutic imagination through purposeful engagement with qualitative research Wished I’d been there: Reflections on the special issue’s articles as refracted through my appreciations for qualitative researchers’ innovativeness Thematic analysis: A practical guide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1