Factors Associated with Survival of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Bystander in Korea

Hyunsoo Kim, J. Park, Kwang-Hwan Kim, S. Bae, Ju-Dong Jang, Moo-Sik Lee
{"title":"Factors Associated with Survival of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Bystander in Korea","authors":"Hyunsoo Kim, J. Park, Kwang-Hwan Kim, S. Bae, Ju-Dong Jang, Moo-Sik Lee","doi":"10.37506/mlu.v21i4.3132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects more than 25,000 cases each year in Korea.The rate of survival and neurological recovery tend to increase in Korea, but less than other developedcountries. Despite the increase in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the number of patientswho have an automated external defibrillator (AED) applied by a bystander remains low. We studied theeffect of bystander CPR on survival of OHCA in Korea. Methods: This study was conducted using the‘Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) Survey’ of Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (KCDC) in 2009to 2018. A total of 45,719 cases of OHCA patients were analyzed. We used a chi-square test, log-rank test,multivariable logistic regression and cox-regression analysis to determine the effect of bystander CPR onsurvival of OHCA, depending on various factors. Results: The rate of survival of OHCA was significantlyaffected by age, past medical history, initial cardiac rhythm, pre-hospital CPR and defibrillation, transporttime and a type of bystander CPR. The survival rate of patients who received bystander CPR was 44.3%,compare with those who did not (43.4%). In cases where bystander CPR was received, the survival rate ofpatients with AED (63.1%) was higher than patients with only chest compression (44.2%). Conclusions:With the increase in bystander CPR rates, it is difficult to expect the effect of intervention of bystanders inKorea. Even though the education on AED and the devices itself has been spread throughout the countrysince 2008, the use of AED remains low. Nevertheless, the use of AED has a positive effect on the survivalof OHCA. Improvements on the rate of AED use by bystander in Korea needs to be further elaborated on.","PeriodicalId":18400,"journal":{"name":"Medico-Legal Update","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medico-Legal Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v21i4.3132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) affects more than 25,000 cases each year in Korea.The rate of survival and neurological recovery tend to increase in Korea, but less than other developedcountries. Despite the increase in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the number of patientswho have an automated external defibrillator (AED) applied by a bystander remains low. We studied theeffect of bystander CPR on survival of OHCA in Korea. Methods: This study was conducted using the‘Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) Survey’ of Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (KCDC) in 2009to 2018. A total of 45,719 cases of OHCA patients were analyzed. We used a chi-square test, log-rank test,multivariable logistic regression and cox-regression analysis to determine the effect of bystander CPR onsurvival of OHCA, depending on various factors. Results: The rate of survival of OHCA was significantlyaffected by age, past medical history, initial cardiac rhythm, pre-hospital CPR and defibrillation, transporttime and a type of bystander CPR. The survival rate of patients who received bystander CPR was 44.3%,compare with those who did not (43.4%). In cases where bystander CPR was received, the survival rate ofpatients with AED (63.1%) was higher than patients with only chest compression (44.2%). Conclusions:With the increase in bystander CPR rates, it is difficult to expect the effect of intervention of bystanders inKorea. Even though the education on AED and the devices itself has been spread throughout the countrysince 2008, the use of AED remains low. Nevertheless, the use of AED has a positive effect on the survivalof OHCA. Improvements on the rate of AED use by bystander in Korea needs to be further elaborated on.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国旁观者心肺复苏后院外心脏骤停患者存活的相关因素
背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)每年在韩国影响超过25,000例。韩国的存活率和神经恢复率有上升的趋势,但低于其他发达国家。尽管旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)的使用有所增加,但由旁观者使用自动体外除颤器(AED)的患者数量仍然很低。我们研究了韩国旁观者心肺复苏术对OHCA患者生存的影响。方法:本研究采用韩国疾病控制与预防中心(KCDC) 2009 - 2018年的“心脏骤停(SCA)调查”进行。共分析了45,719例OHCA患者。我们采用卡方检验、log-rank检验、多变量logistic回归和cox回归分析来确定旁观者心肺复苏术对OHCA患者生存的影响,这取决于各种因素。结果:OHCA患者的生存率受年龄、既往病史、初始心律、院前CPR和除颤、转运时间和旁观者CPR类型的影响显著。接受旁观者心肺复苏术的患者生存率为44.3%,未接受旁观者心肺复苏术的患者生存率为43.4%。在接受旁观者CPR的病例中,AED患者的生存率(63.1%)高于仅胸部按压患者(44.2%)。结论:随着韩国旁观者CPR率的提高,很难预期旁观者干预的效果。尽管自2008年以来,关于AED和设备本身的教育已经在全国范围内普及,但AED的使用率仍然很低。然而,AED的使用对OHCA的存活率有积极的影响。韩国旁观者AED使用率的提高需要进一步阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sociodemographic Profile of Burns Case for Autopsy: One Year Study Correlative Study of Diameter of Carotid Canal with Cranial Index in Maharashtra Population Epidemio-Demographical Study of Anemia in School: Aged groups Profile Study of Railway Fatality Cases Brought for Postmortem Examination at SMS Medical College, Jaipur Comparison Between Volume Controlled Ventilation and Pressure Controlled Ventilation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and their Effects on Hemodynamic and Respiratory Parameters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1