Evolution of Ride Services: From Taxicabs to Ride Hailing and Self-Driving Cars

Dae-Hwan Noh, T. Tunca, Yi Xu
{"title":"Evolution of Ride Services: From Taxicabs to Ride Hailing and Self-Driving Cars","authors":"Dae-Hwan Noh, T. Tunca, Yi Xu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3903493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years decentralized Ride Hailing companies have gained significant market share at the expense of vertically-integrated Taxi companies. Yet, Ride Hailing companies also experienced substantial setbacks, and it is not clear what the endgame between these two competing business models will be. Further, emerging self-driving car technologies, which leads to another form of a vertically-integrated ride service poses further questions on how the industry will shape in the future. In this paper, we aim to gain insights about the evolution and the future of ride services under these two distinct business approaches. We model and analyze competition and entry between Vertically Integrated (VI) and decentralized Ride Hailing (RH) firms. Although the VI model has an advantage for being centralized, we find that when customers are patient, in competition, the RH firm predominantly gains the upper hand in the market with lower delays and higher prices, as well as higher market share and profits even if it has a cost disadvantage. Surprisingly, entry may reduce total vehicle supply, and tends to increase customer waiting times. When customers are impatient, the entry of an inefficient VI firm may even lead to a decrease in social welfare despite introducing competition. Our results provide insights into how decentralized Ride Hailing companies may have a strategic advantage to dominate the market due to their agility and the structure of their business model, and how this can sometimes hurt service quality. Conversely, regulators should also be cautious about subsidizing inefficient Taxi services or self-driving ride services with costly technologies.","PeriodicalId":18516,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Production","volume":"192 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3903493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years decentralized Ride Hailing companies have gained significant market share at the expense of vertically-integrated Taxi companies. Yet, Ride Hailing companies also experienced substantial setbacks, and it is not clear what the endgame between these two competing business models will be. Further, emerging self-driving car technologies, which leads to another form of a vertically-integrated ride service poses further questions on how the industry will shape in the future. In this paper, we aim to gain insights about the evolution and the future of ride services under these two distinct business approaches. We model and analyze competition and entry between Vertically Integrated (VI) and decentralized Ride Hailing (RH) firms. Although the VI model has an advantage for being centralized, we find that when customers are patient, in competition, the RH firm predominantly gains the upper hand in the market with lower delays and higher prices, as well as higher market share and profits even if it has a cost disadvantage. Surprisingly, entry may reduce total vehicle supply, and tends to increase customer waiting times. When customers are impatient, the entry of an inefficient VI firm may even lead to a decrease in social welfare despite introducing competition. Our results provide insights into how decentralized Ride Hailing companies may have a strategic advantage to dominate the market due to their agility and the structure of their business model, and how this can sometimes hurt service quality. Conversely, regulators should also be cautious about subsidizing inefficient Taxi services or self-driving ride services with costly technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乘车服务的演变:从出租车到网约车和自动驾驶汽车
近年来,分散的网约车公司从垂直整合的出租车公司那里获得了可观的市场份额。然而,网约车公司也经历了重大挫折,目前还不清楚这两种竞争商业模式之间的最终结局会是什么。此外,新兴的自动驾驶汽车技术带来了另一种形式的垂直整合乘车服务,这给该行业未来的发展带来了进一步的问题。在本文中,我们的目标是在这两种不同的商业模式下获得关于乘车服务的演变和未来的见解。我们对垂直整合(VI)和分散的网约车(RH)公司之间的竞争和进入进行建模和分析。尽管VI模式具有集中化的优势,但我们发现,当客户有耐心时,在竞争中,RH公司以较低的延迟和较高的价格在市场上占据主导地位,即使它具有成本劣势,也能获得较高的市场份额和利润。令人惊讶的是,进入可能会减少总车辆供应,并倾向于增加客户等待时间。当消费者缺乏耐心时,即使引入竞争,效率低下的VI企业的进入也可能导致社会福利的减少。我们的研究结果揭示了分散式网约车公司如何凭借其敏捷性和商业模式的结构而具有主导市场的战略优势,以及这有时会如何损害服务质量。相反,监管机构也应该谨慎对待用昂贵的技术补贴效率低下的出租车服务或自动驾驶服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pricing the Pharmaceuticals When the Ability to Pay Differs: Taking Vertical Equity Seriously Dual Role Platforms and Search Order Distortion Monopoly, Product Quality and Information Disclosure Production Approach Markup Estimators Often Measure Input Wedges Successful, but not Too Much: Managing Platform Complementors in the Presence of Network Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1