Book review: Decarbonisation and the Energy Industry: Law, Policy and Regulation in Low-Carbon Energy Markets

Q2 Social Sciences Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1177/14614529211017631
D. Shapovalova
{"title":"Book review: Decarbonisation and the Energy Industry: Law, Policy and Regulation in Low-Carbon Energy Markets","authors":"D. Shapovalova","doi":"10.1177/14614529211017631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This volume is very timely, as energy and climate law literature have been developing in parallel, without much integration, leaving a gap in the analysis of regulatory interventions needed to decarbonise energy systems while maintaining the security of supply. Energy law, as a relatively young discipline, is still in the search of a holistic and balanced approach, taking into account the context in which energy regulation exists and operates: justice and equity considerations, environmental concerns, technological constraints and breakthroughs. Energy law scholarship is for the most part split into silos of oil and gas lawyers, renewable energy lawyers, networks and utilities lawyers. This book is an important step towards integration and maturing of the discipline. The book is in two parts, firstly focusing on energy security in the era of decarbonisation (chapters 1–9) and secondly, case studies in energy transition from various countries and regions (chapters 10–16). Most chapters in part 1 centre on private rights and the energy industry, highlighting that ‘governance cannot be monolithic’ (p. 124) and must involve private actors in a meaningful way. Protections accorded to energy industry actors by international investment law have been both the catalyst and the hurdle to decarbonisation. On the one hand, instruments like the Energy Charter Treaty are often used to protect renewable energy producers from subsidies rollbacks; on the other, fossil fuel investors use investment law to bring lawsuits against governments’ decarbonisation actions that might amount to expropriation. This debate is the central topic of chapter 6, which concludes that investment law should be reformed to provide ‘greater transparency’ (p. 174) to investors on States’ energy and climate policies and to introduce appropriate compensation to both investors and the affected communities. The role of the oil and gas industry in climate change governance and decarbonisation, discussed in chapter 8, is important and controversial – climate treaties do not impose obligations on private actors, but the industry’s influence on governments around the world is strong and ongoing. Finally, chapter 9 provides a critical analysis of carbon taxation, arguing that the market alone cannot be effective in decarbonising the energy supply and ‘there is no way to avoid a more interventionist approach to the climate crisis’ (p. 241). The chapters in part 2 meaningfully build on the foundation of part 1 by focusing on specific jurisdictions. Analysis in these chapters brings forward the often-conflicting policy objectives of climate and energy regulation, common to all case studies whether they are ‘resource-rich developing countries’ (p. 3) or developed economies. The former understandably prioritise energy security over climate considerations, evident from analysis in chapters 13 and 16 on energy law in Nigeria and Southern Africa, respectively. At the same time, it is clear that despite the common challenge of providing access to energy, Environmental Law Review","PeriodicalId":52213,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Law Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"297 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529211017631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This volume is very timely, as energy and climate law literature have been developing in parallel, without much integration, leaving a gap in the analysis of regulatory interventions needed to decarbonise energy systems while maintaining the security of supply. Energy law, as a relatively young discipline, is still in the search of a holistic and balanced approach, taking into account the context in which energy regulation exists and operates: justice and equity considerations, environmental concerns, technological constraints and breakthroughs. Energy law scholarship is for the most part split into silos of oil and gas lawyers, renewable energy lawyers, networks and utilities lawyers. This book is an important step towards integration and maturing of the discipline. The book is in two parts, firstly focusing on energy security in the era of decarbonisation (chapters 1–9) and secondly, case studies in energy transition from various countries and regions (chapters 10–16). Most chapters in part 1 centre on private rights and the energy industry, highlighting that ‘governance cannot be monolithic’ (p. 124) and must involve private actors in a meaningful way. Protections accorded to energy industry actors by international investment law have been both the catalyst and the hurdle to decarbonisation. On the one hand, instruments like the Energy Charter Treaty are often used to protect renewable energy producers from subsidies rollbacks; on the other, fossil fuel investors use investment law to bring lawsuits against governments’ decarbonisation actions that might amount to expropriation. This debate is the central topic of chapter 6, which concludes that investment law should be reformed to provide ‘greater transparency’ (p. 174) to investors on States’ energy and climate policies and to introduce appropriate compensation to both investors and the affected communities. The role of the oil and gas industry in climate change governance and decarbonisation, discussed in chapter 8, is important and controversial – climate treaties do not impose obligations on private actors, but the industry’s influence on governments around the world is strong and ongoing. Finally, chapter 9 provides a critical analysis of carbon taxation, arguing that the market alone cannot be effective in decarbonising the energy supply and ‘there is no way to avoid a more interventionist approach to the climate crisis’ (p. 241). The chapters in part 2 meaningfully build on the foundation of part 1 by focusing on specific jurisdictions. Analysis in these chapters brings forward the often-conflicting policy objectives of climate and energy regulation, common to all case studies whether they are ‘resource-rich developing countries’ (p. 3) or developed economies. The former understandably prioritise energy security over climate considerations, evident from analysis in chapters 13 and 16 on energy law in Nigeria and Southern Africa, respectively. At the same time, it is clear that despite the common challenge of providing access to energy, Environmental Law Review
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:《脱碳与能源工业:低碳能源市场的法律、政策和法规》
这本书非常及时,因为能源和气候法文献一直在并行发展,没有太多的整合,在分析能源系统脱碳同时保持供应安全所需的监管干预方面留下了空白。能源法作为一门相对年轻的学科,仍在寻求一种全面和平衡的方法,考虑到能源监管存在和运作的背景:正义和公平的考虑、环境问题、技术限制和突破。能源法奖学金在很大程度上分为石油和天然气律师、可再生能源律师、网络和公用事业律师。这本书是迈向学科整合和成熟的重要一步。本书分为两部分,首先关注脱碳时代的能源安全(第1-9章),其次是各国和地区能源转型的案例研究(第10-16章)。第一部分的大部分章节以私人权利和能源工业为中心,强调“治理不能是单一的”(第124页),必须以有意义的方式让私人行动者参与进来。国际投资法对能源行业参与者的保护既是脱碳的催化剂,也是障碍。一方面,《能源宪章条约》(Energy Charter Treaty)等文书经常被用来保护可再生能源生产商免受补贴削减的影响;另一方面,化石燃料投资者利用投资法对政府可能相当于征用的脱碳行动提起诉讼。这一辩论是第6章的中心主题,该章的结论是,应改革投资法,向投资者提供有关国家能源和气候政策的“更大透明度”(第174页),并向投资者和受影响社区提供适当的补偿。第8章讨论了石油和天然气行业在气候变化治理和脱碳中的作用,这是重要的,也是有争议的——气候条约并没有对私人行为体施加义务,但该行业对世界各国政府的影响是强大的,而且是持续的。最后,第9章对碳税进行了批判性分析,认为单靠市场不能有效地使能源供应脱碳,而且“没有办法避免对气候危机采取更多干预主义的方法”(第241页)。第2部分的各章在第1部分的基础上有意义地建立了对具体司法管辖区的关注。这些章节的分析提出了气候和能源监管经常相互冲突的政策目标,这是所有案例研究的共同点,无论它们是“资源丰富的发展中国家”(第3页)还是发达经济体。可以理解,前者将能源安全置于气候考虑之上,这一点从第13章和第16章分别对尼日利亚和南部非洲能源法的分析中可以看出。与此同时,很明显,尽管提供能源是共同的挑战,环境法评论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Law Review
Environmental Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Book Review: The North Sea System for Petroleum Production, State Intervention on the British and Norwegian Continental Shelves by Brent F Nelsen and Tina Soliman Hunter Ecological constitutionalism within the Canadian context: Charter-ing international standards of the human right to a healthy environment From farm to fork? Brexit and the International Plant Protection Convention Transfer of ESTs in international law: A climate justice approach Biodiversity management challenges: A policy brief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1