Quantifying Non-Linearity in Early Decay Curves of Measured and Computer-Modeled Room Impulse Responses of a Highly Non-Diffuse Room Exhibiting Flutter Echo

Heather Lai, B. Hamilton
{"title":"Quantifying Non-Linearity in Early Decay Curves of Measured and Computer-Modeled Room Impulse Responses of a Highly Non-Diffuse Room Exhibiting Flutter Echo","authors":"Heather Lai, B. Hamilton","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2020-24348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper investigates the use of two room acoustics metrics designed to evaluate the degree to which the linearity assumptions of the energy density curves are valid. The study focuses on measured and computer-modeled energy density curves derived from the room impulse response of a space exhibiting a highly non-diffuse sound field due to flutter echo. In conjunction with acoustical remediation, room impulse response measurements were taken before and after the installation of the acoustical panels. A very dramatic decrease in the reverberation time was experienced due to the addition of the acoustical panels. The two non-linearity metrics used in this study are the non-linearity parameter and the curvature. These metrics are calculated from the energy decay curves computed per octave band, based on the definitions presented in ISO 3382-2. The non-linearity parameter quantifies the deviation of the EDC from a straight line fit used to generated T20 and T30 reverberation times. Where the reverberation times are calculated based on a linear regression of the data relating to either −5 to −25 dB for T20 or −5 to −35 dB for T30 reverberation time calculations. This deviation is quantified using the correlation coefficient between the energy decay curve and the linear regression for the specified data.\n In order to graphically demonstrate these non-linearity metrics, the energy decay curves are plotted along with the linear regression curves for the T20 and T30 reverberation time for both the measured data and two different room acoustics computer-modeling techniques, geometric acoustics modeling and finite-difference wave-based modeling. The intent of plotting these curves together is to demonstrate the relationship between these metrics and the energy decay curve, and to evaluate their use for quantifying degree of non-linearity in non-diffuse sound fields. Observations of these graphical representations are used to evaluate the accuracy of reverberation time estimations in non-diffuse environments, and to evaluate the use of these non-linearity parameters for comparison of different computer-modeling techniques or room configurations. Using these techniques, the non-linearity parameter based on both T20 and T30 linear regression curves and the curvature parameter were calculated over 250–4000 Hz octave bands for the measured and computer-modeled room impulse response curves at two different locations and two different room configurations.\n Observations of these calculated results are used to evaluate the consistency of these metrics, and the application of these metrics to quantifying the degree of non-linearity of the energy decay curve derived from a non-diffuse sound field. These calculated values are also used to evaluate the differences in the degree of diffusivity between the measured and computer-modeled room impulse response. Acoustical computer modeling is often based on geometrical acoustics using ray-tracing and image-source algorithms, however, in non-diffuse sound fields, wave based methods are often able to better model the characteristic sound wave patterns that are developed. It is of interest to study whether these improvements in the wave based computer-modeling are also reflected in the non-linearity parameter calculations.\n The results showed that these metrics provide an effective criteria for identifying non-linearity in the energy decay curve, however for highly non-diffuse sound fields, the resulting values were found to be very sensitive to fluctuations in the energy decay curves and therefore, contain inconsistencies due to these differences.","PeriodicalId":23648,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Acoustics, Vibration, and Phononics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Acoustics, Vibration, and Phononics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2020-24348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of two room acoustics metrics designed to evaluate the degree to which the linearity assumptions of the energy density curves are valid. The study focuses on measured and computer-modeled energy density curves derived from the room impulse response of a space exhibiting a highly non-diffuse sound field due to flutter echo. In conjunction with acoustical remediation, room impulse response measurements were taken before and after the installation of the acoustical panels. A very dramatic decrease in the reverberation time was experienced due to the addition of the acoustical panels. The two non-linearity metrics used in this study are the non-linearity parameter and the curvature. These metrics are calculated from the energy decay curves computed per octave band, based on the definitions presented in ISO 3382-2. The non-linearity parameter quantifies the deviation of the EDC from a straight line fit used to generated T20 and T30 reverberation times. Where the reverberation times are calculated based on a linear regression of the data relating to either −5 to −25 dB for T20 or −5 to −35 dB for T30 reverberation time calculations. This deviation is quantified using the correlation coefficient between the energy decay curve and the linear regression for the specified data. In order to graphically demonstrate these non-linearity metrics, the energy decay curves are plotted along with the linear regression curves for the T20 and T30 reverberation time for both the measured data and two different room acoustics computer-modeling techniques, geometric acoustics modeling and finite-difference wave-based modeling. The intent of plotting these curves together is to demonstrate the relationship between these metrics and the energy decay curve, and to evaluate their use for quantifying degree of non-linearity in non-diffuse sound fields. Observations of these graphical representations are used to evaluate the accuracy of reverberation time estimations in non-diffuse environments, and to evaluate the use of these non-linearity parameters for comparison of different computer-modeling techniques or room configurations. Using these techniques, the non-linearity parameter based on both T20 and T30 linear regression curves and the curvature parameter were calculated over 250–4000 Hz octave bands for the measured and computer-modeled room impulse response curves at two different locations and two different room configurations. Observations of these calculated results are used to evaluate the consistency of these metrics, and the application of these metrics to quantifying the degree of non-linearity of the energy decay curve derived from a non-diffuse sound field. These calculated values are also used to evaluate the differences in the degree of diffusivity between the measured and computer-modeled room impulse response. Acoustical computer modeling is often based on geometrical acoustics using ray-tracing and image-source algorithms, however, in non-diffuse sound fields, wave based methods are often able to better model the characteristic sound wave patterns that are developed. It is of interest to study whether these improvements in the wave based computer-modeling are also reflected in the non-linearity parameter calculations. The results showed that these metrics provide an effective criteria for identifying non-linearity in the energy decay curve, however for highly non-diffuse sound fields, the resulting values were found to be very sensitive to fluctuations in the energy decay curves and therefore, contain inconsistencies due to these differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量和计算机模拟的具有颤振回波的高度非扩散房间脉冲响应的早期衰减曲线的非线性量化
本文研究了两个房间声学指标的使用,旨在评估能量密度曲线的线性假设的有效程度。该研究的重点是测量和计算机模拟的能量密度曲线,这些曲线来自于一个由于颤振回波而表现出高度非扩散声场的空间的房间脉冲响应。与声学修复相结合,在安装声学面板之前和之后进行了房间脉冲响应测量。由于增加了声学板,混响时间急剧减少。本研究中使用的两个非线性度量是非线性参数和曲率。这些指标是根据ISO 3382-2中给出的定义,从每个八度频带计算的能量衰减曲线计算得出的。非线性参数量化了EDC与用于产生T20和T30混响时间的直线拟合的偏差。其中混响时间是基于与T20的- 5至- 25 dB或T30的- 5至- 35 dB混响时间计算相关的数据的线性回归计算的。使用能量衰减曲线与指定数据的线性回归之间的相关系数来量化这种偏差。为了图形化地展示这些非线性指标,我们绘制了T20和T30混响时间的能量衰减曲线以及测量数据和两种不同的室内声学计算机建模技术(几何声学建模和有限差分波建模)的线性回归曲线。绘制这些曲线的目的是为了展示这些指标与能量衰减曲线之间的关系,并评估它们在非漫射声场中量化非线性程度的用途。这些图形表示的观察结果用于评估非扩散环境中混响时间估计的准确性,并用于评估这些非线性参数的使用,以比较不同的计算机建模技术或房间配置。利用这些技术,对两个不同位置和两种不同房间配置下的实测和计算机模拟房间脉冲响应曲线,在250 ~ 4000 Hz的频带范围内,计算了基于T20和T30线性回归曲线的非线性参数和曲率参数。这些计算结果的观测结果用于评估这些指标的一致性,并应用这些指标来量化非漫射声场导出的能量衰减曲线的非线性程度。这些计算值还用于评估测量和计算机模拟的房间脉冲响应之间扩散程度的差异。声学计算机建模通常基于几何声学,使用光线追踪和图像源算法,然而,在非扩散声场中,基于波的方法通常能够更好地模拟所开发的特征声波模式。研究基于波浪的计算机模拟的这些改进是否也反映在非线性参数的计算中是有意义的。结果表明,这些指标为识别能量衰减曲线的非线性提供了有效的准则,但对于高度非扩散声场,结果值对能量衰减曲线的波动非常敏感,因此由于这些差异而存在不一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Machine Learning Framework for Physics-Based Multi-Fidelity Modeling and Health Monitoring for a Composite Wing Design and Numerical Analysis of Locally-Resonant Meta-Lattice Structure for Vibration Attenuation Research on Testing Method and Device of Sensitivity Consistency of Acoustic Emission Sensors Unsupervised Online Anomaly Detection of Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes via a Statistical Time-Frequency Domain Approach Nonlinear Electro-Mechanical Impedance Spectroscopy for Comprehensive Monitoring of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composite Laminates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1