Re-examining the impact of financial intermediation on economic growth: evidence from Turkey

I. Yakubu, Aziza Hashi Abokor, İklim Gedik Balay
{"title":"Re-examining the impact of financial intermediation on economic growth: evidence from Turkey","authors":"I. Yakubu, Aziza Hashi Abokor, İklim Gedik Balay","doi":"10.1108/JED-09-2020-0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study seeks to investigate the impact of financial intermediation on economic growth in Turkey using annual data spanning 1970–2017.Design/methodology/approachBased on the results of the augmented Dickey–Fuller and Phillips–Perron unit root tests for stationarity, the authors employ the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing to cointegration to establish the long-run impact of financial intermediation alongside other control factors on economic growth. The study also examines the short-run relationship between financial intermediation and economic growth by estimating the Error Correction Model (ECM).FindingsThe authors’ findings indicate that financial intermediation significantly influences economic growth in both short and long run. However, the effect is positive only in the short run, lending support to the supply-leading hypothesis. Regarding the control variables, the authors observe that while financial openness shows a positive significant impact on economic growth in the long run, gross fixed capital formation matters only in the short run. The results further infer that regardless of the time period, inflation impedes economic growth.Originality/valueIn the empirical analysis of the relationship between financial intermediation and economic growth, financial intermediation is always measured using a single variable. The authors argue that such studies could produce bias and misleading results given that a single proxy does not adequately reflect financial intermediation activities. Likewise, such findings may delude policy implementation. To provide a more vivid and robust analysis, the authors employ the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to construct a composite index for financial intermediation based on three broad measures. The researchers’ are unaware of any study on the financial intermediation–economic growth nexus using a composite index of financial intermediation. Thus, this paper fills this lacuna in the literature.","PeriodicalId":34568,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Development","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-09-2020-0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

PurposeThis study seeks to investigate the impact of financial intermediation on economic growth in Turkey using annual data spanning 1970–2017.Design/methodology/approachBased on the results of the augmented Dickey–Fuller and Phillips–Perron unit root tests for stationarity, the authors employ the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing to cointegration to establish the long-run impact of financial intermediation alongside other control factors on economic growth. The study also examines the short-run relationship between financial intermediation and economic growth by estimating the Error Correction Model (ECM).FindingsThe authors’ findings indicate that financial intermediation significantly influences economic growth in both short and long run. However, the effect is positive only in the short run, lending support to the supply-leading hypothesis. Regarding the control variables, the authors observe that while financial openness shows a positive significant impact on economic growth in the long run, gross fixed capital formation matters only in the short run. The results further infer that regardless of the time period, inflation impedes economic growth.Originality/valueIn the empirical analysis of the relationship between financial intermediation and economic growth, financial intermediation is always measured using a single variable. The authors argue that such studies could produce bias and misleading results given that a single proxy does not adequately reflect financial intermediation activities. Likewise, such findings may delude policy implementation. To provide a more vivid and robust analysis, the authors employ the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to construct a composite index for financial intermediation based on three broad measures. The researchers’ are unaware of any study on the financial intermediation–economic growth nexus using a composite index of financial intermediation. Thus, this paper fills this lacuna in the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视金融中介对经济增长的影响:来自土耳其的证据
本研究旨在利用1970-2017年的年度数据调查金融中介对土耳其经济增长的影响。基于增强的Dickey-Fuller和Phillips-Perron单位根平稳性检验的结果,作者采用自回归分布滞后(ARDL)界检验来协整,以建立金融中介与其他控制因素对经济增长的长期影响。本文还通过误差修正模型(Error Correction Model, ECM)检验了金融中介与经济增长之间的短期关系。研究结果表明,金融中介对经济增长的短期和长期影响显著。然而,这种效应只在短期内是积极的,为供给主导假说提供了支持。在控制变量方面,作者观察到,虽然金融开放在长期对经济增长具有显著的正影响,但固定资本形成总额仅在短期内起作用。结果进一步推断,无论在哪个时期,通货膨胀都会阻碍经济增长。在对金融中介与经济增长关系的实证分析中,金融中介总是使用单一变量来衡量。作者认为,鉴于单一代理不能充分反映金融中介活动,此类研究可能产生偏见和误导性结果。同样,这些发现可能会误导政策的实施。为了提供一个更生动和稳健的分析,作者采用主成分分析(PCA)来构建一个基于三个广泛措施的金融中介综合指数。研究人员并不知道有任何使用金融中介综合指数来研究金融中介与经济增长关系的研究。因此,本文填补了这一文献空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of technical change on income inequality in Vietnam Asymmetric thresholds of macroeconomic volatility's impact on stock volatility in developing economies: a study in Vietnam Mobile money, food security and coping strategies in a post-conflict and fragile context: evidence from Burundi The effect of financial inclusion and economic integration on green growth in ASEAN Optimum firm size in Vietnam: does subcontracting matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1