Ecclesiastical crimes and penalties in the Constitution of the Serbian Ortodox Church

Filip Mirić
{"title":"Ecclesiastical crimes and penalties in the Constitution of the Serbian Ortodox Church","authors":"Filip Mirić","doi":"10.5937/kom2201061m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author analyzes ecclesiastical penalties, according to the Constitution of the Serbian Orthodox Church (SPC) of 1947. This is the highest legal act of the SPC which contains, besides the provisions that regulate the rules of church life and the authority of certain bodies of the SPC, a number of provisions related to offenses (guilt) and sanctions for unlawful acts. In addition to the offenses and system of ecclesiastical criminal sanctions, the paper also points to the jurisdiction of church courts in pronouncing ecclesiastical sentences. Church impunity and punishment are presented, in accordance with the system of the Constitution of the SPC. The penalties vary depending on whether they can be given to priests or believers because the purpose of punishment is different from those of the two categories of Church members. Wherever necessary, the similarities and differences are pointed out between the criminal law provisions in Constitution of the Serbian Orthodox Church and the criminal law of the Republic of Serbia, as well as development of ecclestiastical crimes and penalties from first cannons, Dušan's Code to nowdays. The aim of this paper is to point out to both scholarly and expert public, and believers, who are most often lay people, this part of the church right, which, according to the author, is unjustly neglected in this kind of papers.","PeriodicalId":31566,"journal":{"name":"Kom Casopis za Religijske Nauke","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kom Casopis za Religijske Nauke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/kom2201061m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the author analyzes ecclesiastical penalties, according to the Constitution of the Serbian Orthodox Church (SPC) of 1947. This is the highest legal act of the SPC which contains, besides the provisions that regulate the rules of church life and the authority of certain bodies of the SPC, a number of provisions related to offenses (guilt) and sanctions for unlawful acts. In addition to the offenses and system of ecclesiastical criminal sanctions, the paper also points to the jurisdiction of church courts in pronouncing ecclesiastical sentences. Church impunity and punishment are presented, in accordance with the system of the Constitution of the SPC. The penalties vary depending on whether they can be given to priests or believers because the purpose of punishment is different from those of the two categories of Church members. Wherever necessary, the similarities and differences are pointed out between the criminal law provisions in Constitution of the Serbian Orthodox Church and the criminal law of the Republic of Serbia, as well as development of ecclestiastical crimes and penalties from first cannons, Dušan's Code to nowdays. The aim of this paper is to point out to both scholarly and expert public, and believers, who are most often lay people, this part of the church right, which, according to the author, is unjustly neglected in this kind of papers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塞尔维亚东正教会宪法中的教会罪行和惩罚
本文以1947年塞尔维亚东正教会《宪法》为依据,分析了教会的刑罚。这是最高人民法院的最高法律文件,除了规范教会生活规则和最高人民法院某些机构的职权外,还包含了一些有关违法(犯罪)和对违法行为的制裁的规定。除了教会刑事制裁的罪名和制度外,本文还指出了教会法院在宣布教会判决中的管辖权。根据最高人民法院宪法的制度,对教会的有罪不罚和惩罚进行了介绍。处罚的目的不同于对神职人员和信徒的处罚,因此处罚的对象也会有所不同。在必要时,指出了塞尔维亚东正教《宪法》中的刑法规定与塞尔维亚共和国刑法之间的异同,以及从最初的大炮、Dušan《法典》到现在的宗教罪行和刑罚的发展。这篇论文的目的是向学者和专家公众,以及信徒(通常是俗人)指出,在这类论文中,这部分教会权利被不公正地忽视了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
An analysis of the trinity and principle beliefs within the Bektashi Alavi order Study and analysis of the functions of al-Urf in understanding and inferring the religious rules Religion in the postmodern West and the challenges of the new atheism The bases for the formation and growth of Shiism from the past to the present in Indonesia Unity in multiplicity: The mystical unity of existence in Mulla Sadra's Al-Shawahid Al-Rububiyyah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1