Christianity, Human Rights, and American Political Polarization

Q2 Arts and Humanities Modern American History Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1017/mah.2023.11
Gene Zubovich
{"title":"Christianity, Human Rights, and American Political Polarization","authors":"Gene Zubovich","doi":"10.1017/mah.2023.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the course of the twentieth century, American conceptions of rights became more global. This development—usually described as a move from “civil rights” to “human rights”—was especially acute in American Christian communities. The role of Christianity deserves our attention because of the religion's important role in the conceptualization, popularization, and practice of human rights in the United States and, thanks to Christians’ overseas networks, to every corner of the world.1 The increasingly global understanding of rights, however, did not lead to the liberalization of rights for American Christians. True, human rights talk contributed to important milestones in religious pluralism and the Civil Rights movement, and often served as a gateway to democratic liberalism for some groups resistant to the American liberal tradition. Human rights, however, were not only a liberal project. Conservatives also embraced human rights but in starkly different ways. The divergent interpretations of human rights were not merely a reflection of the growing political divide in the second half of the twentieth century. Christian activists’ adoption of human rights helped forge new alliances and exacerbated the divide between liberal and conservative Christianity, and between political liberalism and political conservatism.","PeriodicalId":36673,"journal":{"name":"Modern American History","volume":"32 1","pages":"69 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mah.2023.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the course of the twentieth century, American conceptions of rights became more global. This development—usually described as a move from “civil rights” to “human rights”—was especially acute in American Christian communities. The role of Christianity deserves our attention because of the religion's important role in the conceptualization, popularization, and practice of human rights in the United States and, thanks to Christians’ overseas networks, to every corner of the world.1 The increasingly global understanding of rights, however, did not lead to the liberalization of rights for American Christians. True, human rights talk contributed to important milestones in religious pluralism and the Civil Rights movement, and often served as a gateway to democratic liberalism for some groups resistant to the American liberal tradition. Human rights, however, were not only a liberal project. Conservatives also embraced human rights but in starkly different ways. The divergent interpretations of human rights were not merely a reflection of the growing political divide in the second half of the twentieth century. Christian activists’ adoption of human rights helped forge new alliances and exacerbated the divide between liberal and conservative Christianity, and between political liberalism and political conservatism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基督教、人权与美国政治两极分化
在二十世纪的进程中,美国的权利观念变得更加全球化。这种发展——通常被描述为从“公民权利”到“人权”的转变——在美国基督教社区尤为明显。基督教的作用值得我们关注,因为它在美国的人权概念、普及和实践中发挥了重要作用,并且由于基督教的海外网络,它在世界的每一个角落都发挥了重要作用然而,对权利日益全球化的理解并没有导致美国基督徒权利的自由化。的确,人权言论为宗教多元化和民权运动的重要里程碑做出了贡献,并经常成为一些抵制美国自由主义传统的团体通往民主自由主义的门户。然而,人权不仅仅是一个自由主义的项目。保守派也拥护人权,但方式截然不同。对人权的不同解释不仅仅是二十世纪下半叶日益扩大的政治分歧的反映。基督教活动人士对人权的采纳有助于建立新的联盟,并加剧了基督教自由主义与保守主义、政治自由主义与政治保守主义之间的分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modern American History
Modern American History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
F. A. Hayek, Libertarianism, and the Denationalization of Money The “Other” Pro-Israel Lobby: The AFL-CIO and Israel (1952–1960) Normalizing Relations from the Cold War to the Present: Continuing War, Pursuing Peace, and Building Empire The Global Jukebox and the Celestial Monochord: Alan Lomax and Harry Smith Compute Folk Music in Cold War America Bringing “The Plant” to Life: Imagining Community Revitalization in the Neoliberal Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1