Genetic evaluation of growth and survival at 6 weeks old fry of Egyptian Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) between improved Abbassa and commercial Manzala strains in a diallel crossing

M. R. Md Said, W. Mekkawy
{"title":"Genetic evaluation of growth and survival at 6 weeks old fry of Egyptian Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) between improved Abbassa and commercial Manzala strains in a diallel crossing","authors":"M. R. Md Said, W. Mekkawy","doi":"10.21608/ejap.2016.93610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate growth performance and estimate additive genetic, heterosis, and general reciprocal effects for body weight, body length, condition factor, and survival of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry at 6 weeks old after hatching using a complete diallel cross between the genetically improved “Abbassa” strain(A) and a commercially available strain Manzala(M). Body weight and total body length were observed significantly (P <0.001) higher in MmAf and AmMf crosses (2.87g & 5.55 cm; 2.78g & 5.33cm, respectively). The straight-bred AmAf weight and length were 2.64g, 5.18cm, respectively while the straightbred MmMf showed the lowest growth parameters 2.42g and 5.04cm,respectively.Condition factor of AmAf, AmMf, and MmMf genotypes (1.89, 1.85, and 1.81 respectively) didn’t differ significantly whereas the MmAf cross showed a significantly lower condition factor 1.67. The survival of the straight-bred AmAf was 0.98,which significantly (P <0.001) higher than AmMf, MmAf, and MmMf genotypes. Abbassa strain showed 5, 2.1, and 10% additive genetic effect above the overall mean in body weight, survival, and condition factor respectively. Heterosis estimates were positive and relatively high 11.7% and 6.2% for body weight and total body length while a negative heterosis estimates were observed for the condition factor and survival, being -6.7% and -2.6% respectively. Reciprocal effect was significant (P <0.001) for total body length and condition factor. The results of the current study suggest that body weight and total body length of the Nile tilapia fry at 6 weeks old after hatching could be improved through crossing schemes exploiting the heterosis effect however the crossing did not show any improvement in survival.","PeriodicalId":93197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal production","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejap.2016.93610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate growth performance and estimate additive genetic, heterosis, and general reciprocal effects for body weight, body length, condition factor, and survival of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry at 6 weeks old after hatching using a complete diallel cross between the genetically improved “Abbassa” strain(A) and a commercially available strain Manzala(M). Body weight and total body length were observed significantly (P <0.001) higher in MmAf and AmMf crosses (2.87g & 5.55 cm; 2.78g & 5.33cm, respectively). The straight-bred AmAf weight and length were 2.64g, 5.18cm, respectively while the straightbred MmMf showed the lowest growth parameters 2.42g and 5.04cm,respectively.Condition factor of AmAf, AmMf, and MmMf genotypes (1.89, 1.85, and 1.81 respectively) didn’t differ significantly whereas the MmAf cross showed a significantly lower condition factor 1.67. The survival of the straight-bred AmAf was 0.98,which significantly (P <0.001) higher than AmMf, MmAf, and MmMf genotypes. Abbassa strain showed 5, 2.1, and 10% additive genetic effect above the overall mean in body weight, survival, and condition factor respectively. Heterosis estimates were positive and relatively high 11.7% and 6.2% for body weight and total body length while a negative heterosis estimates were observed for the condition factor and survival, being -6.7% and -2.6% respectively. Reciprocal effect was significant (P <0.001) for total body length and condition factor. The results of the current study suggest that body weight and total body length of the Nile tilapia fry at 6 weeks old after hatching could be improved through crossing schemes exploiting the heterosis effect however the crossing did not show any improvement in survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双列杂交改良Abbassa和Manzala品系6周龄埃及尼罗罗非鱼鱼苗生长和存活的遗传评价
本研究旨在评估尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis niloticus)鱼苗在孵化后6周龄时的生长性能,并评估加性遗传、杂种优势和一般互惠效应对体重、体长、条件因子和存活率的影响,采用遗传改良的“Abbassa”品系(a)和市售品系Manzala(M)的完全双列杂交。MmAf和AmMf杂交体质量和体长显著(P <0.001)提高(2.87g和5.55 cm;2.78克和5.33厘米)。纯种AmAf的体重和长度分别为2.64g和5.18cm,纯种MmMf的生长参数最低,分别为2.42g和5.04cm。AmAf、AmMf和MmMf基因型的条件因子差异不显著(分别为1.89、1.85和1.81),而MmAf基因型的条件因子差异显著(1.67)。纯种AmAf的存活率为0.98,显著(P <0.001)高于amf、MmAf和MmMf基因型。Abbassa品系的体重、存活率和条件因子的加性遗传效应分别高于整体平均水平5、2.1和10%。体重和体长的杂种优势估计值分别为11.7%和6.2%,而条件因子和存活率的杂种优势估计值分别为-6.7%和-2.6%。总体长与条件因子的交互效应显著(P <0.001)。本研究结果表明,利用杂种优势效应的杂交方案可以提高6周龄尼罗罗非鱼苗的体重和体长,但杂交对存活率没有任何改善作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANTI-MÜLLERIAN HORMONE (AMH) AS ENDOCRINE MARKER FOR EMBRYO PRODUCTION IN SUPEROVULATED FRIESIAN COWS FEED VALUE OF PROCESSED AND ENZYME SUPPLEMENTED CASSAVA PEEL IN GROWING PIGS INFLUENCE OF YEAST AND LACTOBACILLUS PRODUCTS AS FEED SUPPLEMENTS ON BLOOD PARAMETERS AND REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING EGYPTIAN BUFFALOES CHARACTERIZATION OF SOME PRODUCTIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS OF SYRIAN SHAMI AND HOLSTEIN COWS UNDER SYRIAN CONDITIONS COMPARISON OF THREE NONLINEAR MODELS TO DESCRIBE THE GROWTH CURVE OF HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN BULLS RAISED UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1