Prognostic Value of Serum Cholesterol and Triglyceride in Septic and Non-septic Patients: Randomized Double-blinded Study

D. Rashwan, S. Rashwan, W. Hassan, Doaa Moaz Sayem
{"title":"Prognostic Value of Serum Cholesterol and Triglyceride in Septic and Non-septic Patients: Randomized Double-blinded Study","authors":"D. Rashwan, S. Rashwan, W. Hassan, Doaa Moaz Sayem","doi":"10.21767/2471-8505.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Is to evaluate the difference between the level of serum cholesterol and triglyceride in septic and non-septic patients and to find a correlation between the level of cholesterol and triglyceride and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Materials and Methods: 95 patients admitted to the SICU, septic patients (group S, n=50) or non-septic patients (NS, n=45). Main outcome measures: length of ICU stay, 28-day mortality, days on mechanical ventilation, (APACHE II) scores, (qSOFA) scores, serum cholesterol, and triglyceride on days 0 and on 1st, 3rd, 7th,10th and 14th day. Result: Cholesterol level (mg/dL) Day 0: It was statistically significant lower in septic group (S) compared to the non-septic group (NS); it was 119.4 ± 29.33 versus 131.2 ± 35.37 (p value=0.037). Day 1: It was statistically significantly lower in the septic group (S): 103.6 ± 29.19 than the non-septic group (NS):123.56 ± 36.50 (p value E‚0.001). Day 3: It was statistically significantly lower in the septic group (S) 80.7 ± 26.87 than in the non-septic group (NS) 124.84 ± 32.4 (p value <0.001). Triglyceride level (mg/dL): Day 1: Was statistically significantly higher in the septic group (S): 151.5 ± 54.79, than the non-septic group (NS): 112.14 ± 33.02, (p value <0.001). Day 3: It was statistically significant higher in the septic group (S):185.1 ± 43.1 than the non-septic group (NS): 113.5 ± 39.56), (p value <0.001). Conclusion: Cholesterol levels decreased markedly and triglyceride levels increased in patients with sepsis compared to non-septic patients, in the septic patients there was increasing in length of ICU stay, higher qSOFA, and APACHE II scores.","PeriodicalId":91546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive and critical care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/2471-8505.100120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: Is to evaluate the difference between the level of serum cholesterol and triglyceride in septic and non-septic patients and to find a correlation between the level of cholesterol and triglyceride and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Score and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Materials and Methods: 95 patients admitted to the SICU, septic patients (group S, n=50) or non-septic patients (NS, n=45). Main outcome measures: length of ICU stay, 28-day mortality, days on mechanical ventilation, (APACHE II) scores, (qSOFA) scores, serum cholesterol, and triglyceride on days 0 and on 1st, 3rd, 7th,10th and 14th day. Result: Cholesterol level (mg/dL) Day 0: It was statistically significant lower in septic group (S) compared to the non-septic group (NS); it was 119.4 ± 29.33 versus 131.2 ± 35.37 (p value=0.037). Day 1: It was statistically significantly lower in the septic group (S): 103.6 ± 29.19 than the non-septic group (NS):123.56 ± 36.50 (p value E‚0.001). Day 3: It was statistically significantly lower in the septic group (S) 80.7 ± 26.87 than in the non-septic group (NS) 124.84 ± 32.4 (p value <0.001). Triglyceride level (mg/dL): Day 1: Was statistically significantly higher in the septic group (S): 151.5 ± 54.79, than the non-septic group (NS): 112.14 ± 33.02, (p value <0.001). Day 3: It was statistically significant higher in the septic group (S):185.1 ± 43.1 than the non-septic group (NS): 113.5 ± 39.56), (p value <0.001). Conclusion: Cholesterol levels decreased markedly and triglyceride levels increased in patients with sepsis compared to non-septic patients, in the septic patients there was increasing in length of ICU stay, higher qSOFA, and APACHE II scores.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清胆固醇和甘油三酯在脓毒症和非脓毒症患者中的预后价值:随机双盲研究
目的:评价脓毒症患者与非脓毒症患者血清胆固醇和甘油三酯水平的差异,探讨胆固醇和甘油三酯水平与急性生理与慢性健康评估评分和快速序期器官衰竭评估评分的相关性。材料与方法:SICU收治的患者95例,脓毒症患者(S组,n=50)和非脓毒症患者(NS组,n=45)。主要观察指标:ICU住院时间、28天死亡率、机械通气天数、(APACHE II)评分、(qSOFA)评分、第0天和第1、3、7、10、14天的血清胆固醇和甘油三酯。结果:胆固醇水平(mg/dL)第0天:脓毒症组(S)低于非脓毒症组(NS);分别为119.4±29.33∶131.2±35.37 (p值=0.037)。第1天:脓毒症组(S): 103.6±29.19低于非脓毒症组(NS):123.56±36.50,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。第3天:脓毒症组(S) 80.7±26.87低于非脓毒症组(NS) 124.84±32.4 (p值<0.001)。甘油三酯水平(mg/dL):第1天:脓毒症组(S): 151.5±54.79,高于非脓毒症组(NS): 112.14±33.02,差异有统计学意义(p值<0.001)。第3天:脓毒症组(S):185.1±43.1高于非脓毒症组(NS): 113.5±39.56,差异有统计学意义(p值<0.001)。结论:与非脓毒症患者相比,脓毒症患者的胆固醇水平明显下降,甘油三酯水平升高,脓毒症患者的ICU住院时间增加,qSOFA和APACHE II评分较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges of Maternal and Prenatal Care in Nigeria Associated Microorganisms in Clinical Specimens from Neurology Intensive Care Unit of A Tertiary Care Hospital In Adana, Turkey Dysphagia in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Tertiary Care Hospital Engerix-B Vaccine Induced Transient Hepatitis B Surface Antigenemia: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Low Serum Phosphorus Levels and Acute Ischemic Stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1