The Effects of Proactive Release Behaviors During Human-Robot Handovers

Zhao Han, H. Yanco
{"title":"The Effects of Proactive Release Behaviors During Human-Robot Handovers","authors":"Zhao Han, H. Yanco","doi":"10.1109/HRI.2019.8673085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most research on human-robot handovers focuses on how the robot should approach human receivers and notify them of the readiness to take an object; few studies have investigated the effects of different release behaviors. Not releasing an object when a person desires to take it breaks handover fluency and creates a bad handover experience. In this paper, we investigate the effects of different release behaviors. Specifically, we study the benefits of a proactive release, during which the robot actively detects a human grasp effort pattern. In a 36-participant user study11The study is ready to reproduce with a Baxter robot. The code and environment setup is available at https://github.com/umhan35/handover_moveit, results suggest proactive release is more efficient than rigid release (which only releases when the robot is fully stopped) and passive release (the robot detects pulling by checking if a threshold value is reached). Subjectively, the overall handover experience is improved: the proactive release is significantly better in terms of handover fluency and ease-of-taking.","PeriodicalId":6600,"journal":{"name":"2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"440-448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Most research on human-robot handovers focuses on how the robot should approach human receivers and notify them of the readiness to take an object; few studies have investigated the effects of different release behaviors. Not releasing an object when a person desires to take it breaks handover fluency and creates a bad handover experience. In this paper, we investigate the effects of different release behaviors. Specifically, we study the benefits of a proactive release, during which the robot actively detects a human grasp effort pattern. In a 36-participant user study11The study is ready to reproduce with a Baxter robot. The code and environment setup is available at https://github.com/umhan35/handover_moveit, results suggest proactive release is more efficient than rigid release (which only releases when the robot is fully stopped) and passive release (the robot detects pulling by checking if a threshold value is reached). Subjectively, the overall handover experience is improved: the proactive release is significantly better in terms of handover fluency and ease-of-taking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人-机器人交接过程中主动释放行为的影响
大多数关于人-机器人移交的研究集中在机器人如何接近人类接收者并通知他们准备好接受物体;很少有研究调查不同释放行为的影响。当一个人想要拿走一个东西的时候,不释放它会破坏交接的流畅性,并造成糟糕的交接体验。在本文中,我们研究了不同释放行为的影响。具体来说,我们研究了主动释放的好处,在此期间,机器人主动检测人类的抓取努力模式。在一项36人参与的用户研究中,该研究准备用百特机器人进行复制。代码和环境设置可在https://github.com/umhan35/handover_moveit上获得,结果表明主动释放比刚性释放(仅在机器人完全停止时释放)和被动释放(机器人通过检查是否达到阈值来检测拉力)更有效。主观上,整体的移交体验得到了提升:主动释放在移交流畅性和易用性上明显更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arpi, a Social Robot for Children with Epilepsy AMIGUS: A Robot Companion for Students (Video Abstract) MAPPO: The Assistance Pet for Oncological Children (Video Abstract) ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2022, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, March 7 - 10, 2022 Leveraging Non-Experts and Formal Methods to Automatically Correct Robot Failures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1