Antibodies to Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) in Farmed and Wild Florida White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus)

Allison Cauvin, E. Dinh, Jeremy P Orange, Rebecca M. Shuman, J. Blackburn, S. Wisely
{"title":"Antibodies to Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus (EHDV) in Farmed and Wild Florida White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus)","authors":"Allison Cauvin, E. Dinh, Jeremy P Orange, Rebecca M. Shuman, J. Blackburn, S. Wisely","doi":"10.7589/2019-02-034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The transmission of multiple serotypes of epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) between farmed and free-ranging wildlife is of interest to livestock industries and natural resource agencies. We compared the seroprevalence of EHDV-1, -2, and -6 in wild and farmed white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) herds in Florida, US. We compared serological prevalence, circulating serotypes, antibody titers, and viremia with the use of 171 whole-blood samples from 150 unvaccinated white-tailed deer from farm pens, a farm preserve, and wild deer on adjacent public lands between March 2016 and May 2017. Despite aggressive chemical vector control on the farm, we found higher seroprevalence and titers against the predominant EHDV serotype in farmed deer (in pens and the preserve) than in wild deer. The higher exposure to EHDV of farmed vs. wild deer may have been because of the higher densities of farmed vs. wild deer, the presence of exotic amplifying hosts such as elk (Cervus canadensis) in the preserve, or genetic factors that predisposed farmed deer to disease.","PeriodicalId":22805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Wildlife Diseases","volume":"24 1","pages":"208 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Wildlife Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7589/2019-02-034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Abstract: The transmission of multiple serotypes of epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) between farmed and free-ranging wildlife is of interest to livestock industries and natural resource agencies. We compared the seroprevalence of EHDV-1, -2, and -6 in wild and farmed white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) herds in Florida, US. We compared serological prevalence, circulating serotypes, antibody titers, and viremia with the use of 171 whole-blood samples from 150 unvaccinated white-tailed deer from farm pens, a farm preserve, and wild deer on adjacent public lands between March 2016 and May 2017. Despite aggressive chemical vector control on the farm, we found higher seroprevalence and titers against the predominant EHDV serotype in farmed deer (in pens and the preserve) than in wild deer. The higher exposure to EHDV of farmed vs. wild deer may have been because of the higher densities of farmed vs. wild deer, the presence of exotic amplifying hosts such as elk (Cervus canadensis) in the preserve, or genetic factors that predisposed farmed deer to disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养殖和野生佛罗里达白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)流行性出血热病毒(EHDV)抗体
摘要:多种血清型动物流行性出血病病毒(EHDV)在养殖和放养野生动物之间的传播是畜牧业和自然资源部门关注的问题。我们比较了美国佛罗里达州野生和养殖白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)群中EHDV-1、-2和-6的血清患病率。我们比较了2016年3月至2017年5月期间来自农场围栏、农场保护区和邻近公共土地上的150只未接种白尾鹿和野鹿的171份全血样本的血清学患病率、循环血清型、抗体滴度和病毒血症。尽管在农场进行了积极的化学媒介控制,但我们发现养殖鹿(围栏和保护区)的EHDV主要血清型的血清阳性率和滴度高于野生鹿。与野鹿相比,养殖鹿暴露于EHDV的几率更高,可能是因为养殖鹿的密度高于野鹿,保护园内存在外来扩增宿主,如麋鹿(Cervus canadensis),或者遗传因素使养殖鹿易患疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Handbook of Wildlife Chemical Immobilization Human-Wildlife Conflict Management Pioneer Science and the Great Plagues. Chemical and Physical Restraint of African Wild Animals. Presenting Science Concisely.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1