Cognitive Conflict-Based E-Book with Real Experiment Video Analysis Integration to Enhance Conceptual Understanding of Motion Kinematics

F. Mufit, A. Asrizal*, R. Puspitasari, A. Annisa N
{"title":"Cognitive Conflict-Based E-Book with Real Experiment Video Analysis Integration to Enhance Conceptual Understanding of Motion Kinematics","authors":"F. Mufit, A. Asrizal*, R. Puspitasari, A. Annisa N","doi":"10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students find it challenging to understand motion concept or mechanics in physics learning and often experience misconceptions. There is also a lack of teaching materials that promote conceptual understanding. This study aims to produce a valid, practical, and effective e-book based on cognitive conflict to enhance conceptual understanding. This research used explanatory sequential mixed methods. The effectiveness test was carried out through an experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design. Using the cluster random sampling, 61 science students performed as the samples. The research instruments used were interview guides, observation sheets, questionnaires, and two-level multiple-choice concept tests. The data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using Aiken's V formula, the percentage technique, and the Mann-Whitney hypothesis test. This study produced an e-book according to the four syntaxes of the cognitive conflict-based learning model (CCBL). Real experiment video analysis was integrated into the third syntax. The e-book is valid in content, construct, language, and graphics, with an average of 0.83 in the high category. This e-book is practical in terms of user convenience, attractiveness, and benefits, with an average of 79.6 in the strong category. This e-book is effective, with a significant effect of 0.001 0.05 on conceptual understanding and misconceptions. We concluded that the cognitive conflict-based e-book with real experiment video analysis integration is valid, practical, and effective in enhancing students' conceptual understanding of motion kinematics. ","PeriodicalId":37652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Students find it challenging to understand motion concept or mechanics in physics learning and often experience misconceptions. There is also a lack of teaching materials that promote conceptual understanding. This study aims to produce a valid, practical, and effective e-book based on cognitive conflict to enhance conceptual understanding. This research used explanatory sequential mixed methods. The effectiveness test was carried out through an experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design. Using the cluster random sampling, 61 science students performed as the samples. The research instruments used were interview guides, observation sheets, questionnaires, and two-level multiple-choice concept tests. The data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using Aiken's V formula, the percentage technique, and the Mann-Whitney hypothesis test. This study produced an e-book according to the four syntaxes of the cognitive conflict-based learning model (CCBL). Real experiment video analysis was integrated into the third syntax. The e-book is valid in content, construct, language, and graphics, with an average of 0.83 in the high category. This e-book is practical in terms of user convenience, attractiveness, and benefits, with an average of 79.6 in the strong category. This e-book is effective, with a significant effect of 0.001 0.05 on conceptual understanding and misconceptions. We concluded that the cognitive conflict-based e-book with real experiment video analysis integration is valid, practical, and effective in enhancing students' conceptual understanding of motion kinematics. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于认知冲突的电子图书与真实实验视频分析集成以增强运动运动学的概念理解
学生发现在物理学习中理解运动概念或力学具有挑战性,并且经常遇到误解。此外,也缺乏促进概念理解的教材。本研究旨在以认知冲突为基础,制作有效、实用、有效的电子书,以增进概念理解。本研究采用解释性序贯混合方法。有效性检验采用前测后测对照组设计的实验方法进行。采用整群随机抽样的方法,选取61名理工科学生作为样本。研究工具包括访谈指南、观察表、问卷调查和两级选择概念测试。采用Aiken的V公式、百分比技术和Mann-Whitney假设检验对数据进行定性和定量分析。本研究根据基于认知冲突的学习模型(cognitive conflict-based learning model, CCBL)的四种语法制作了一本电子书。真实实验视频分析被整合到第三句法中。该电子书在内容、结构、语言和图形方面都是有效的,在高类别中平均得分为0.83。这本电子书在用户便利性、吸引力和好处方面都很实用,在强类别中平均得分为79.6分。这本电子书是有效的,在概念理解和误解上的显著影响为0.001 0.05。我们得出结论,基于认知冲突的电子书与真实实验视频分析相结合,在增强学生对运动运动学的概念理解方面是有效的、实用的和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy, and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. Moreover, this journal also covers the issues concerned with environmental education & environmental science.
期刊最新文献
Enhance The Understanding in Periodic Table of Element Using Crossword Puzzles among Form 4 Students Correlation between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Environmental Values of Female Pre-Service Science Teachers in Indonesia A Comparative Study of Basic Science Process Skills of Science Students at Higher Secondary Level in District Rawalpindi, Pakistan Implementation the Ethnoscience-Based Smart Module to Improve Students’ Patriotism Project-Based Learning Via Traditional Game in Physics Learning: Its Impact on Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Collaborative Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1