Does mixed ownership reform affect private firms’ ESG practices? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments Pub Date : 2022-06-17 DOI:10.1111/fmii.12164
June Cao, Wenwen Li, Shujuan Xiao
{"title":"Does mixed ownership reform affect private firms’ ESG practices? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China","authors":"June Cao,&nbsp;Wenwen Li,&nbsp;Shujuan Xiao","doi":"10.1111/fmii.12164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the impact of property rights reform on private firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. ESG investing has become mainstream and a hot topic globally, but it is a black box of corporate ESG practices and performance. Importantly, it is not clear how to specifically enhance private firms’ ESG practices. This study addresses this problem by exploring an ideal setting of China's mixed-ownership reform in which private firms acquire equity in state-owned enterprises (SOEs). We examine whether and how this reform affects private acquirer firms’ ESG practices. Using a powerful difference-in-differences design, we find that mixed-ownership reform significantly enhances private firms’ ESG practices through heightened public scrutiny and the privileges of formal financing and government subsidies that are available due to the firms’ partial government ownership after mixed-ownership reform. Our findings have policy implications for promoting ESG practices and SOE reform. Specifically, our empirical evidence indicates that mixed-ownership reform can facilitate sustainable development for both SOEs and private firms.</p>","PeriodicalId":39670,"journal":{"name":"Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments","volume":"31 2-3","pages":"47-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fmii.12164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of property rights reform on private firms’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. ESG investing has become mainstream and a hot topic globally, but it is a black box of corporate ESG practices and performance. Importantly, it is not clear how to specifically enhance private firms’ ESG practices. This study addresses this problem by exploring an ideal setting of China's mixed-ownership reform in which private firms acquire equity in state-owned enterprises (SOEs). We examine whether and how this reform affects private acquirer firms’ ESG practices. Using a powerful difference-in-differences design, we find that mixed-ownership reform significantly enhances private firms’ ESG practices through heightened public scrutiny and the privileges of formal financing and government subsidies that are available due to the firms’ partial government ownership after mixed-ownership reform. Our findings have policy implications for promoting ESG practices and SOE reform. Specifically, our empirical evidence indicates that mixed-ownership reform can facilitate sustainable development for both SOEs and private firms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合所有制改革是否影响民营企业的ESG实践?来自中国一项准自然实验的证据
本研究探讨了产权改革对私营企业环境、社会和治理(ESG)实践的影响。ESG投资已成为全球主流和热门话题,但它是企业ESG实践和绩效的黑箱。重要的是,目前尚不清楚如何具体加强私营公司的ESG实践。本研究通过探讨中国混合所有制改革中民企参股国有企业的理想情况来解决这一问题。我们研究了这一改革是否以及如何影响私人收购公司的ESG实践。通过使用强大的“差中之差”设计,我们发现混合所有制改革通过加强公众监督,以及混合所有制改革后由于企业的部分政府所有权而获得的正式融资和政府补贴特权,显著提高了私营企业的ESG实践。我们的研究结果对促进ESG实践和国企改革具有政策意义。具体而言,我们的经验证据表明,混合所有制改革可以促进国有企业和民营企业的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments
Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments bridges the gap between the academic and professional finance communities. With contributions from leading academics, as well as practitioners from organizations such as the SEC and the Federal Reserve, the journal is equally relevant to both groups. Each issue is devoted to a single topic, which is examined in depth, and a special fifth issue is published annually highlighting the most significant developments in money and banking, derivative securities, corporate finance, and fixed-income securities.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Do banks adjust their capital when they face liquidity shortages? Evidence from U.S. commercial banks Piercing through the haze: Did PPP increase versus decrease bank efficiency? Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1