Adaptation of the Fears of Compassion Scale into Turkish: a reliability and validity study.

IF 4.2 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY The FASEB Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp.2021.110028
Isil Necef, Mehmet Engin Deniz
{"title":"Adaptation of the Fears of Compassion Scale into Turkish: a reliability and validity study.","authors":"Isil Necef, Mehmet Engin Deniz","doi":"10.5114/cipp.2021.110028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of fear of compassion draws the interest of researchers in both clinical and scientific fields. The Fears of Compassion Scale (FCS) was developed in order to examine the fear of compassion for others, compassion from others and compassion for one's self. This study aims to adapt the FCS into the Turkish language. The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Self-Compassion Scale were used to assess the criterion-related validity of the FCS.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>In order to determine the construct validity of the scale, validity and reliability studies and factor analysis were carried out on 681 participants (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 32.00, <i>SD</i> = 10.15; 64% female and 36% male).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the confirmatory factor analysis yielded the expected 3-factor solution (the fear of compassion for others, the fear of compassion from others and the fear of self-compassion), which consists of 35 items. The internal consistency validity coefficient of the whole scale was .92. Moreover, there were significant negative relationships between the Fears of Compassion Scale, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and Self-Compassion Scale, which are similar to those of the original scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These significant findings reveal the Turkish adaptation of the FCS to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":50455,"journal":{"name":"The FASEB Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654340/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The FASEB Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.110028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The concept of fear of compassion draws the interest of researchers in both clinical and scientific fields. The Fears of Compassion Scale (FCS) was developed in order to examine the fear of compassion for others, compassion from others and compassion for one's self. This study aims to adapt the FCS into the Turkish language. The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Self-Compassion Scale were used to assess the criterion-related validity of the FCS.

Participants and procedure: In order to determine the construct validity of the scale, validity and reliability studies and factor analysis were carried out on 681 participants (Mage = 32.00, SD = 10.15; 64% female and 36% male).

Results: The results of the confirmatory factor analysis yielded the expected 3-factor solution (the fear of compassion for others, the fear of compassion from others and the fear of self-compassion), which consists of 35 items. The internal consistency validity coefficient of the whole scale was .92. Moreover, there were significant negative relationships between the Fears of Compassion Scale, the Satisfaction with Life Scale and Self-Compassion Scale, which are similar to those of the original scale.

Conclusions: These significant findings reveal the Turkish adaptation of the FCS to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同情恐惧量表在土耳其语中的适应性:信度和效度研究
同情恐惧的概念引起了临床和科学领域研究人员的兴趣。同情恐惧量表(FCS)的开发是为了检查对他人同情的恐惧,来自他人的同情和对自己的同情。本研究旨在将FCS改编为土耳其语。采用生活满意度量表和自我同情量表评估FCS的标准相关效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The FASEB Journal
The FASEB Journal 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
6243
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The FASEB Journal publishes international, transdisciplinary research covering all fields of biology at every level of organization: atomic, molecular, cell, tissue, organ, organismic and population. While the journal strives to include research that cuts across the biological sciences, it also considers submissions that lie within one field, but may have implications for other fields as well. The journal seeks to publish basic and translational research, but also welcomes reports of pre-clinical and early clinical research. In addition to research, review, and hypothesis submissions, The FASEB Journal also seeks perspectives, commentaries, book reviews, and similar content related to the life sciences in its Up Front section.
期刊最新文献
Integrative Transcriptomic and Bioinformatics Approaches Combined With Transformer Models Identify Key Gene Networks in Atherosclerosis. Molecular Insights Into Cardioembolism: NT-proBNP and D-Dimer Augment Risk Stratification and Drive NF-κB/NLRP3-Mediated Injury. The Microbiome Modulates Corneal Wound Healing via the Induction of Cholesterol Sulfotransferase Pathway. Receptor-Dependent and -Independent Effects of Hemin on Platelet Plasma Membrane Disintegration. Anti-TP0136 Antibody Delayed Syphilis Wound Healing by Inhibiting Angiogenesis Through the VEGF-A Signaling Pathway: A Novel View in Nonhealing Syphilis Wounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1