Bimanual motor coordination controlled by cooperative interactions in intrinsic and extrinsic coordinates

Takeshi Sakurada, Koji Ito, H. Gomi
{"title":"Bimanual motor coordination controlled by cooperative interactions in intrinsic and extrinsic coordinates","authors":"Takeshi Sakurada, Koji Ito, H. Gomi","doi":"10.1111/ejn.13123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although strong motor coordination in intrinsic muscle coordinates has frequently been reported for bimanual movements, coordination in extrinsic visual coordinates is also crucial in various bimanual tasks. To explore the bimanual coordination mechanisms in terms of the frame of reference, here we characterized implicit bilateral interactions in visuomotor tasks. Visual perturbations (finger‐cursor gain change) were applied while participants performed a rhythmic tracking task with both index fingers under an in‐phase or anti‐phase relationship in extrinsic coordinates. When they corrected the right finger's amplitude, the left finger's amplitude unintentionally also changed [motor interference (MI)], despite the instruction to keep its amplitude constant. Notably, we observed two specificities: one was large MI and low relative‐phase variability (PV) under the intrinsic in‐phase condition, and the other was large MI and high PV under the extrinsic in‐phase condition. Additionally, using a multiple‐interaction model, we successfully decomposed MI into intrinsic components caused by motor correction and extrinsic components caused by visual‐cursor mismatch of the right finger's movements. This analysis revealed that the central nervous system facilitates MI by combining intrinsic and extrinsic components in the condition with in‐phases in both intrinsic and extrinsic coordinates, and that under‐additivity of the effects is explained by the brain's preference for the intrinsic interaction over extrinsic interaction. In contrast, the PV was significantly correlated with the intrinsic component, suggesting that the intrinsic interaction dominantly contributed to bimanual movement stabilization. The inconsistent features of MI and PV suggest that the central nervous system regulates multiple levels of bilateral interactions for various bimanual tasks.","PeriodicalId":79424,"journal":{"name":"Supplement ... to the European journal of neuroscience","volume":"69 1","pages":"120 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supplement ... to the European journal of neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Although strong motor coordination in intrinsic muscle coordinates has frequently been reported for bimanual movements, coordination in extrinsic visual coordinates is also crucial in various bimanual tasks. To explore the bimanual coordination mechanisms in terms of the frame of reference, here we characterized implicit bilateral interactions in visuomotor tasks. Visual perturbations (finger‐cursor gain change) were applied while participants performed a rhythmic tracking task with both index fingers under an in‐phase or anti‐phase relationship in extrinsic coordinates. When they corrected the right finger's amplitude, the left finger's amplitude unintentionally also changed [motor interference (MI)], despite the instruction to keep its amplitude constant. Notably, we observed two specificities: one was large MI and low relative‐phase variability (PV) under the intrinsic in‐phase condition, and the other was large MI and high PV under the extrinsic in‐phase condition. Additionally, using a multiple‐interaction model, we successfully decomposed MI into intrinsic components caused by motor correction and extrinsic components caused by visual‐cursor mismatch of the right finger's movements. This analysis revealed that the central nervous system facilitates MI by combining intrinsic and extrinsic components in the condition with in‐phases in both intrinsic and extrinsic coordinates, and that under‐additivity of the effects is explained by the brain's preference for the intrinsic interaction over extrinsic interaction. In contrast, the PV was significantly correlated with the intrinsic component, suggesting that the intrinsic interaction dominantly contributed to bimanual movement stabilization. The inconsistent features of MI and PV suggest that the central nervous system regulates multiple levels of bilateral interactions for various bimanual tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由内在和外在坐标上的合作相互作用控制的双手运动协调
虽然内在肌肉坐标的强烈运动协调经常被报道为双手运动,但外在视觉坐标的协调在各种双手任务中也至关重要。为了从参照系的角度探讨双手协调机制,我们对视觉运动任务中的内隐双边互动进行了表征。当参与者在外部坐标中以同相或反相关系使用两个食指进行有节奏的跟踪任务时,施加视觉扰动(手指-光标增益变化)。当他们纠正右手手指的振幅时,尽管指示保持其振幅不变,但左手手指的振幅也无意中发生了变化[运动干扰(MI)]。值得注意的是,我们观察到两个特异性:一个是内在同相条件下的大MI和低相对相变异性(PV),另一个是外在同相条件下的大MI和高PV。此外,利用多重交互模型,我们成功地将MI分解为由运动校正引起的内在成分和由右手指运动的视觉光标不匹配引起的外在成分。该分析表明,中枢神经系统通过将内源性和外源性成分与内源性和外源性坐标相结合来促进MI的发生,并且大脑对内源性相互作用比对外源性相互作用的偏好可以解释这种效应的低加性。相比之下,PV与内在成分显著相关,表明内在相互作用对双手运动稳定起主要作用。MI和PV的不一致特征表明,中枢神经系统调节了各种手工任务的多个水平的双边相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time elapsed between choices in a probabilistic task correlates with repeating the same decision Degradation levels of continuous speech affect neural speech tracking and alpha power differently Visually evoked responses are enhanced when engaging in a video game Human tau increases amyloid β plaque size but not amyloid β‐mediated synapse loss in a novel mouse model of Alzheimer's disease A transcallosal fibre system between homotopic inferior frontal regions supports complex linguistic processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1