Use of the Allgöwer-Donati suture technique for wound closure following transmetatarsal amputation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.25270/wnds/22096
Zachery Weyandt, Thomas Poynter, Nicolas Laco, Jonathan Towarnicki, S. Coleman
{"title":"Use of the Allgöwer-Donati suture technique for wound closure following transmetatarsal amputation.","authors":"Zachery Weyandt, Thomas Poynter, Nicolas Laco, Jonathan Towarnicki, S. Coleman","doi":"10.25270/wnds/22096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe Allgöwer-Donati suture technique reportedly has lower incision perfusion impairment compared with other suture techniques. The authors of the present case series hypothesized that suture technique selection to achieve lower incision perfusion impairment may result in improved healing rates and decreased incidence of wound complications in partial foot amputations, specifically TMAs.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate the efficacy of TMA with skin closure completed using the Allgöwer-Donati suture technique.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThe records of 7 patients (8 limbs) who underwent closure with the Allgöwer-Donati suture technique after TMA between March 2021 and March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with a diagnosis of gangrene were included.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFive of 8 limbs (62.5%) healed uneventfully, with an average time to healing of 3.3 weeks. Six of 8 limbs (75%) healed within 4 weeks, and 1 limb was lost to follow-up.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe results of this small case series suggest that use of the Allgöwer-Donati suture technique may result in decreased incidence of wound complications by allowing improved perfusion at the amputation site.","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wnds/22096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The Allgöwer-Donati suture technique reportedly has lower incision perfusion impairment compared with other suture techniques. The authors of the present case series hypothesized that suture technique selection to achieve lower incision perfusion impairment may result in improved healing rates and decreased incidence of wound complications in partial foot amputations, specifically TMAs. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of TMA with skin closure completed using the Allgöwer-Donati suture technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS The records of 7 patients (8 limbs) who underwent closure with the Allgöwer-Donati suture technique after TMA between March 2021 and March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with a diagnosis of gangrene were included. RESULTS Five of 8 limbs (62.5%) healed uneventfully, with an average time to healing of 3.3 weeks. Six of 8 limbs (75%) healed within 4 weeks, and 1 limb was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The results of this small case series suggest that use of the Allgöwer-Donati suture technique may result in decreased incidence of wound complications by allowing improved perfusion at the amputation site.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Allgöwer-Donati缝合技术在经跖骨截肢术后伤口愈合中的应用。
据报道,与其他缝合技术相比,Allgöwer-Donati缝合技术具有较低的切口灌注损伤。本病例系列的作者假设,选择缝合技术以实现较低的切口灌注损伤可能会提高部分足部截肢,特别是TMAs的愈合率并降低伤口并发症的发生率。目的评价Allgöwer-Donati缝合技术完成TMA皮肤闭合的疗效。材料与方法回顾性分析2021年3月至2022年3月7例(8条肢体)TMA术后采用Allgöwer-Donati缝合技术缝合的病例。仅包括诊断为坏疽的患者。结果8例肢体中5例(62.5%)愈合平稳,平均愈合时间3.3周。8条肢体中有6条(75%)在4周内愈合,1条肢体失访。结论:这个小病例系列的结果表明,Allgöwer-Donati缝合技术可以改善截肢部位的灌注,从而减少伤口并发症的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Diving deep into healing: the promising role of fish skin in wound recovery. Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evaluating the number of cellular and/or tissue-based product applications required to treat diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers in non-hospital outpatient department settings. Skin cancer or locally advanced mammary carcinoma: a discussion of cutaneous pathology on the male chest. Use of silver collagen oxidized regenerated cellulose dressings in conjunction with negative pressure wound therapy: expert panel consensus recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1