Assessment of Whether Patients’ Knowledge, Satisfaction, and Experience Regarding Their 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Examination Affects Image Quality

Camilla Andersson, B. Johansson, C. Wassberg, S. Johansson, A. Sundin, H. Ahlström
{"title":"Assessment of Whether Patients’ Knowledge, Satisfaction, and Experience Regarding Their 18F-Fluoride PET/CT Examination Affects Image Quality","authors":"Camilla Andersson, B. Johansson, C. Wassberg, S. Johansson, A. Sundin, H. Ahlström","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.115.167536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to investigate patients’ previous knowledge, satisfaction, and experience regarding an 18F-fluoride PET/CT examination and to explore whether any discomfort or pain during the examination was associated with reduced image quality. A further aim was to explore whether patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was associated with their satisfaction and experience regarding the examination. Methods: Between November 2011 and April 2013, 50 consecutive patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer who were scheduled for 18F-fluoride PET/CT were asked to participate in the study. A questionnaire was used to collect information on the patients’ previous knowledge and experience regarding the examination. Image quality was assessed according to an arbitrary scale. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the prostate cancer–specific module (QLQ-PR25) were used to assess HRQoL. Results: Forty-six patients (96%) completed the questionnaire. Twenty-six percent did not at all know what a 18F-fluoride PET/CT examination was. Most (52%–70%) were satisfied to a very high degree with the care provided by the nursing staff but were less satisfied with the information given before the examination. Image quality was similar between patients who were exhausted or claustrophobic during the examination and those who were not. No correlations between HRQoL and the patients’ experience regarding 18F-fluoride PET/CT were found. Conclusion: Most patients were satisfied with the care provided by the nursing staff, but there is still room for improvement, especially regarding the information provided before the examination. A long examination time may be strenuous for the patient, but there was no difference in image quality between patients who felt discomfort or pain during the examination and those who did not.","PeriodicalId":22799,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"21 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.115.167536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate patients’ previous knowledge, satisfaction, and experience regarding an 18F-fluoride PET/CT examination and to explore whether any discomfort or pain during the examination was associated with reduced image quality. A further aim was to explore whether patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was associated with their satisfaction and experience regarding the examination. Methods: Between November 2011 and April 2013, 50 consecutive patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer who were scheduled for 18F-fluoride PET/CT were asked to participate in the study. A questionnaire was used to collect information on the patients’ previous knowledge and experience regarding the examination. Image quality was assessed according to an arbitrary scale. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the prostate cancer–specific module (QLQ-PR25) were used to assess HRQoL. Results: Forty-six patients (96%) completed the questionnaire. Twenty-six percent did not at all know what a 18F-fluoride PET/CT examination was. Most (52%–70%) were satisfied to a very high degree with the care provided by the nursing staff but were less satisfied with the information given before the examination. Image quality was similar between patients who were exhausted or claustrophobic during the examination and those who were not. No correlations between HRQoL and the patients’ experience regarding 18F-fluoride PET/CT were found. Conclusion: Most patients were satisfied with the care provided by the nursing staff, but there is still room for improvement, especially regarding the information provided before the examination. A long examination time may be strenuous for the patient, but there was no difference in image quality between patients who felt discomfort or pain during the examination and those who did not.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对18f -氟化物PET/CT检查的知识、满意度和经验是否影响图像质量的评估
本研究的目的是调查患者之前对18f -氟化物PET/CT检查的知识、满意度和经验,并探讨检查过程中的任何不适或疼痛是否与图像质量下降有关。进一步的目的是探讨患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)是否与他们对检查的满意度和体验相关。方法:选取2011年11月至2013年4月期间连续50例经组织病理学诊断为前列腺癌并计划进行18f -氟化物PET/CT检查的患者作为研究对象。采用问卷调查的方式收集患者以往对检查的了解和经验。根据任意尺度对图像质量进行评价。采用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)和前列腺癌特异性模块(QLQ-PR25)评估HRQoL。结果:46例患者(96%)完成问卷调查。26%的人根本不知道18f -氟化物PET/CT检查是什么。大多数患者(52% ~ 70%)对护理人员提供的护理非常满意,但对检查前提供的信息不满意。在检查过程中,疲惫或幽闭恐惧症患者与非疲惫或幽闭恐惧症患者的图像质量相似。HRQoL与患者对18f -氟化物PET/CT的体验无相关性。结论:大多数患者对护理人员的护理感到满意,但仍有改进的空间,特别是在检查前提供的信息方面。长时间的检查对患者来说可能是艰苦的,但在检查过程中感到不适或疼痛的患者与没有感到不适或疼痛的患者之间的图像质量没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy Stability Matters: Radiochemical Stability of Therapeutic Radiopharmaceutical 177Lu-PSMA I&T Small-Bowel and Colon Transit SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Molecular Breast Imaging with Dedicated γ-Cameras SNMMI Clinical Trials Network Research Series for Technologists: Clinical Research Primer—Regulatory Process, Part II: The Role of the Institutional Review Board in Food and Drug Administration–Regulated Radiopharmaceutical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1