3 Evaluation of the reliability and quality of the nutritional information in COVID-19 videos shared on YouTube

E. Inan-Eroglu, Z. Buyuktuncer
{"title":"3 Evaluation of the reliability and quality of the nutritional information in COVID-19 videos shared on YouTube","authors":"E. Inan-Eroglu, Z. Buyuktuncer","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2022-summit2022.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundWith the range of nutrition information online, assessing the resources that public access may improve the reliability and quality of the nutritional related COVID-19 information. The quality and reliability of the nutritional information in COVID-19 available on video sharing websites such as YouTube is unknown.ObjectivesTo evaluate whether the popularity of the videos correlated with the reliability and quality as determined by using the recognized quality scoring systems.MethodsYouTube was searched using the terms ‘nutrition and COVID-19’ in Turkish on February 1st, 2021. Videos were subsequently filtered according to relevancy, and first 280 videos were analyzed. Videos in other languages, duplicate videos, and live videos were excluded. A total of 218 videos were reviewed. Video demographics including number of views, likes, and dislikes were recorded. The upload source of each video was classified as news channel, health professionals, health centers, TV channels, government organisations, educational organisations and independent individual channels based on the information given at ‘about’ section of their YouTube profile. The transparency, utility, reliability and accuracy of video content was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMA score). Quality of the videos were assessed with Global Quality Score (GQS).ResultsAccording to the video source, 30.7% of the videos were shared by health professionals including doctors, dietitians, and nurses, whereas 18.7% of them shared by independent users. Educational organisations only shared 5% of the videos. Videos shared by health centers had the highest JAMA score (2.2 ± 0.8) followed by government organisations (2.1 ± 0.7). The independent users and TV channels’ videos had the lowest JAMA score (1.7 ± 0.7). GQS was the highest for government organisations’ videos (3.5 ± 01.1) whereas it was lowest for TV channels’ videos (2.8 ± 01.1). There was a significant positive correlation between JAMA score and GQS of the videos (r=0.201, p=0.05). According to the assessment of the relationship between length, number of views, likes, dislikes, view and like ratio, there was a correlation between the length of the video, like ratio and GQS (r=0.193, p=0.004 and r=0.140, p=0.039 respectively). There were not any significant associations between quantitative variables and JAMA score.ConclusionHealth professionals, educational and government organisations need to more engage in the spread of nutrition-related COVID-19 information to internet platforms such as YouTube. This will be an effective and immediately implementable public health strategy to effectively spread the right information.","PeriodicalId":6892,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2022-summit2022.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundWith the range of nutrition information online, assessing the resources that public access may improve the reliability and quality of the nutritional related COVID-19 information. The quality and reliability of the nutritional information in COVID-19 available on video sharing websites such as YouTube is unknown.ObjectivesTo evaluate whether the popularity of the videos correlated with the reliability and quality as determined by using the recognized quality scoring systems.MethodsYouTube was searched using the terms ‘nutrition and COVID-19’ in Turkish on February 1st, 2021. Videos were subsequently filtered according to relevancy, and first 280 videos were analyzed. Videos in other languages, duplicate videos, and live videos were excluded. A total of 218 videos were reviewed. Video demographics including number of views, likes, and dislikes were recorded. The upload source of each video was classified as news channel, health professionals, health centers, TV channels, government organisations, educational organisations and independent individual channels based on the information given at ‘about’ section of their YouTube profile. The transparency, utility, reliability and accuracy of video content was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMA score). Quality of the videos were assessed with Global Quality Score (GQS).ResultsAccording to the video source, 30.7% of the videos were shared by health professionals including doctors, dietitians, and nurses, whereas 18.7% of them shared by independent users. Educational organisations only shared 5% of the videos. Videos shared by health centers had the highest JAMA score (2.2 ± 0.8) followed by government organisations (2.1 ± 0.7). The independent users and TV channels’ videos had the lowest JAMA score (1.7 ± 0.7). GQS was the highest for government organisations’ videos (3.5 ± 01.1) whereas it was lowest for TV channels’ videos (2.8 ± 01.1). There was a significant positive correlation between JAMA score and GQS of the videos (r=0.201, p=0.05). According to the assessment of the relationship between length, number of views, likes, dislikes, view and like ratio, there was a correlation between the length of the video, like ratio and GQS (r=0.193, p=0.004 and r=0.140, p=0.039 respectively). There were not any significant associations between quantitative variables and JAMA score.ConclusionHealth professionals, educational and government organisations need to more engage in the spread of nutrition-related COVID-19 information to internet platforms such as YouTube. This will be an effective and immediately implementable public health strategy to effectively spread the right information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3 .对YouTube上分享的COVID-19视频中营养信息的可靠性和质量进行评估
有了在线营养信息的范围,评估公众可获取的资源可能会提高COVID-19营养相关信息的可靠性和质量。在YouTube等视频分享网站上提供的新冠肺炎营养信息的质量和可靠性尚不清楚。目的采用公认的质量评分系统,评价视频的受欢迎程度与视频的可靠性和质量之间的相关性。方法于2021年2月1日在土耳其语中使用“营养和COVID-19”搜索youtube。随后根据相关性对视频进行过滤,并对前280个视频进行分析。其他语言的视频、重复视频和直播视频被排除在外。总共审查了218个视频。视频人口统计数据包括观看次数,喜欢和不喜欢的记录。每个视频的上传来源根据其YouTube个人资料“关于”部分提供的信息分为新闻频道、卫生专业人员、卫生中心、电视频道、政府机构、教育机构和独立的个人频道。视频内容的透明度、实用性、可靠性和准确性采用美国医学会杂志基准标准(JAMA评分)进行评估。视频质量采用全球质量评分(GQS)进行评估。结果从视频来源来看,30.7%的视频是由医生、营养师和护士等卫生专业人员分享的,18.7%的视频是由独立用户分享的。教育机构只分享了5%的视频。医疗机构共享视频的JAMA评分最高(2.2±0.8),其次是政府机构(2.1±0.7)。独立用户和电视频道视频的JAMA评分最低(1.7±0.7)。GQS最高的是政府机构的视频(3.5±01.1),最低的是电视频道的视频(2.8±01.1)。JAMA评分与视频GQS呈显著正相关(r=0.201, p=0.05)。根据视频长度、观看次数、喜欢、不喜欢、观看次数和点赞比之间的关系评估,视频长度、点赞比与GQS之间存在相关性(r=0.193, p=0.004, r=0.140, p=0.039)。定量变量与JAMA评分之间无显著相关性。卫生专业人员、教育机构和政府机构需要更多地参与到YouTube等互联网平台上传播与COVID-19营养相关的信息。这将是一项有效且可立即实施的公共卫生战略,以有效传播正确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OC45 Copper deficiency in paediatric jejunal tube feeding OC79 Differences of health related quality of life in children with EoE – implications for patients, parents and professionals OC57 Safety and effectiveness of IV Ferric Derisomaltose in treatment of iron deficiency anaemia – Results from two paediatric tertiary gastroenterology centres OC54 When are epithelioid granulomas detected in children with Crohn’s disease? OC75 Age based clinical phenotype and complications of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1