Why offspring delay dispersal: experimental evidence for a role of parental tolerance

J. Ekman, M. Griesser
{"title":"Why offspring delay dispersal: experimental evidence for a role of parental tolerance","authors":"J. Ekman, M. Griesser","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2002.2082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximately 3% of all bird species live in families based on a prolonged parent–offspring association. Formation of family groups often appears to be associated with various constraints on the possibilities of independent reproduction for the offspring. However, delayed dispersal is not the only alternative for offspring that defer reproduction. To account for the formation of a family group it is also necessary to explain why non–dispersing offspring forego the alternative options to join other groups as‘extra bird’ or to become‘floater’ and roam between territories. We removed fathers from Siberian jay Perisoreus infaustus family groups to test the proposal that nepotistic parental tolerance gives the natal territory a special value for the offspring, which they cannot find elsewhere and that makes them stay. In this species, parents are more tolerant of their retained offspring than towards immigrant extra birds. In response to the removal of fathers, retained offspring dispersed, whereas there was no similar response among the unrelated extra birds. Retained offspring, however, left only after despotic immigrant α–males replaced removed fathers, indicating that the presence of fathers is an essential motive for offspring to delay their dispersal. By blocking immigrant and unrelated males from becoming α–males and by being tolerant themselves, fathers provide a‘safe have’ in the natal territory where retained offspring can avail themselves of available resources without any, or only mild, competitive interference.","PeriodicalId":20585,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Approximately 3% of all bird species live in families based on a prolonged parent–offspring association. Formation of family groups often appears to be associated with various constraints on the possibilities of independent reproduction for the offspring. However, delayed dispersal is not the only alternative for offspring that defer reproduction. To account for the formation of a family group it is also necessary to explain why non–dispersing offspring forego the alternative options to join other groups as‘extra bird’ or to become‘floater’ and roam between territories. We removed fathers from Siberian jay Perisoreus infaustus family groups to test the proposal that nepotistic parental tolerance gives the natal territory a special value for the offspring, which they cannot find elsewhere and that makes them stay. In this species, parents are more tolerant of their retained offspring than towards immigrant extra birds. In response to the removal of fathers, retained offspring dispersed, whereas there was no similar response among the unrelated extra birds. Retained offspring, however, left only after despotic immigrant α–males replaced removed fathers, indicating that the presence of fathers is an essential motive for offspring to delay their dispersal. By blocking immigrant and unrelated males from becoming α–males and by being tolerant themselves, fathers provide a‘safe have’ in the natal territory where retained offspring can avail themselves of available resources without any, or only mild, competitive interference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么后代延迟扩散:亲代容忍作用的实验证据
大约3%的鸟类以长期的亲子关系为基础生活在家庭中。家庭群体的形成似乎常常与对后代独立繁殖可能性的各种限制有关。然而,延迟扩散并不是后代推迟繁殖的唯一选择。为了解释一个家庭群体的形成,也有必要解释为什么不分散的后代放弃了作为“额外的鸟”加入其他群体或成为“漂浮者”并在领土之间漫游的其他选择。我们从西伯利亚松鸦Perisoreus infaustus家族中取出父亲,以验证裙带关系的父母宽容给后代带来了一种特殊的价值,这种价值是它们在其他地方找不到的,因此它们会留下来。在这个物种中,父母对他们留下的后代比对外来移民更宽容。作为对父亲消失的反应,保留下来的后代分散了,而在不相关的额外鸟类中没有类似的反应。然而,保留下来的后代只有在专制的移民α -雄性取代被移走的父亲后才会留下,这表明父亲的存在是后代推迟分散的重要动机。通过阻止外来的和无亲缘关系的雄性成为α -雄性,并通过自己的宽容,父亲们在出生地提供了一个“安全地带”,在那里,留下来的后代可以在没有任何或只有轻微竞争干扰的情况下利用可用的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermal processing. 'Affinity'. Correction for Durant et al., Trophic interactions under climate fluctuations: the Atlantic puffin as an example Correction for Johnstone and Bshary, Evolution of spite through indirect reciprocity Correction for Frönicke et al., Towards the delineation of the ancestral eutherian genome organization: comparative genome maps of human and the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) generated by chromosome painting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1