Who Should Regulate The Industry of Financial Technology?

Suwinto Johan, S. Sugiarto
{"title":"Who Should Regulate The Industry of Financial Technology?","authors":"Suwinto Johan, S. Sugiarto","doi":"10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.34048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial technology (fintech) has outgrown its capacity. Industry supervision and consumer protection have become a challenge. Until now, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK) has been considered responsible for supervising the financial technology industry. The purpose of this research is to determine whether the Indonesian Financial Services Authority is capable of leading the fintech industry and whether a separate agency to oversee the fintech industry is necessary. This study employs a normative juridical methodology. This study examines the entire financial industry. According to this research, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority lacks the authority to regulate the fintech industry. The government should enact special legislation and regulations to govern the fintech industry. The regulator must consider creating a separate agency to supervise the fintech industry, similar to the Indonesian Financial Services Authority. This particular agency is comprised of individuals with ties to the financial sector, the telecommunications industry, and other law enforcement personnel.","PeriodicalId":30516,"journal":{"name":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","volume":"163 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.34048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Financial technology (fintech) has outgrown its capacity. Industry supervision and consumer protection have become a challenge. Until now, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority (OJK) has been considered responsible for supervising the financial technology industry. The purpose of this research is to determine whether the Indonesian Financial Services Authority is capable of leading the fintech industry and whether a separate agency to oversee the fintech industry is necessary. This study employs a normative juridical methodology. This study examines the entire financial industry. According to this research, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority lacks the authority to regulate the fintech industry. The government should enact special legislation and regulations to govern the fintech industry. The regulator must consider creating a separate agency to supervise the fintech industry, similar to the Indonesian Financial Services Authority. This particular agency is comprised of individuals with ties to the financial sector, the telecommunications industry, and other law enforcement personnel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁来监管金融科技行业?
金融科技(fintech)已经超出了它的能力。行业监管和消费者保护已成为一个挑战。到目前为止,印尼金融服务管理局(OJK)一直被认为负责监管金融科技行业。本研究的目的是确定印尼金融服务管理局是否有能力领导金融科技行业,以及是否有必要设立一个独立的机构来监督金融科技行业。本研究采用规范的司法方法。这项研究考察了整个金融行业。根据这项研究,印尼金融服务管理局缺乏监管金融科技行业的权力。政府应该制定专门的法律法规来管理金融科技行业。监管机构必须考虑成立一个独立的机构来监管金融科技行业,类似于印尼金融服务管理局(Indonesian Financial Services Authority)。这个特别的机构由与金融部门、电信行业和其他执法人员有联系的个人组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Criminal Law to Determine Persons of Environmental Pollution and/or Destruction in Court Covid-19 Pandemic as Force Majeure Unable to Fulfill Obligation in Financing Agreement Social Engineering to Overcome Conflict Between People’s Markets and Supermarkets in Kulon Progo Regency (Review of Regional Regulation No. 16 of 2021) Reposition of the Promulgation for Indonesian Legislation Qualification of Child Status from Unregistered Polygamous Marriage without Marriage Validation (Study of Religious Court Decisions from 2019-2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1