Divergent View on the Use of Interpolation Techniques in Reservoir Analysis

Ebuka Ezenworo, G. Achumba, K. Adenuga
{"title":"Divergent View on the Use of Interpolation Techniques in Reservoir Analysis","authors":"Ebuka Ezenworo, G. Achumba, K. Adenuga","doi":"10.2118/198839-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The most common methods of interpolation are direct, lagrange, newton divided difference, and spline. Each of these techniques has first, second, and third order approximating polynomials that can be used anytime the need for interpolation arises in mathematical analysis. Of all the methods outlined above, the first order approximating polynomials of these interpolation techniques have found great use because of the ease of application. The fact that these polynomials estimate approximate values calls for the need to check the most accurate interpolation method. Accuracy in reservoir modelling and analysis is of great importance to the petroleum industry because business decisions are taken from the outcome of such analysis. Most of these analyses depend on the accuracy of interpolation been employed.\n In this paper, some basic PVT parameters were analyzed with both large and few data points. Few data points were used in order to replicate real life scenario since most of the PVT parameters come with few data point after laboratory experiments. For the large data points, all the interpolating techniques irrespective of the order of their approximating polynomials gave a good result but with few data points, different results were obtained. From the results, it was observed that for PVT interpolations, spline third order approximating polynomial performed better than the rest with few data points.","PeriodicalId":11110,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198839-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most common methods of interpolation are direct, lagrange, newton divided difference, and spline. Each of these techniques has first, second, and third order approximating polynomials that can be used anytime the need for interpolation arises in mathematical analysis. Of all the methods outlined above, the first order approximating polynomials of these interpolation techniques have found great use because of the ease of application. The fact that these polynomials estimate approximate values calls for the need to check the most accurate interpolation method. Accuracy in reservoir modelling and analysis is of great importance to the petroleum industry because business decisions are taken from the outcome of such analysis. Most of these analyses depend on the accuracy of interpolation been employed. In this paper, some basic PVT parameters were analyzed with both large and few data points. Few data points were used in order to replicate real life scenario since most of the PVT parameters come with few data point after laboratory experiments. For the large data points, all the interpolating techniques irrespective of the order of their approximating polynomials gave a good result but with few data points, different results were obtained. From the results, it was observed that for PVT interpolations, spline third order approximating polynomial performed better than the rest with few data points.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对储层分析中插值技术应用的不同看法
最常用的插值方法有直接插值、拉格朗日插值、牛顿微分插值和样条插值。这些技术中的每一种都有一阶、二阶和三阶近似多项式,可以在数学分析中需要插值的任何时候使用。在上述所有方法中,由于易于应用,这些插值技术的一阶近似多项式已经发现了很大的用途。事实上,这些多项式估计近似值要求需要检查最准确的插值方法。油藏建模和分析的准确性对石油工业来说非常重要,因为商业决策是根据这些分析的结果做出的。这些分析大多依赖于所采用的插值的准确性。本文对PVT的一些基本参数进行了大数据点和少数据点的分析。由于大多数PVT参数在实验室实验后只有很少的数据点,因此为了复制真实场景,使用了很少的数据点。对于大数据点,所有插值方法不论其逼近多项式的阶数如何,都能得到较好的插值结果,但在数据点较少的情况下,得到的结果不同。结果表明,对于PVT插值,样条三阶近似多项式在数据点较少的情况下表现较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Well Production Tubing Diameter on Multiphase Flow Regime Profile in Oredo Fields, Niger Delta, Nigeria Cassandra: A Model and Simulator Developed for Critical Drawdown Estimation in Unconsolidated Reservoirs The Use of 4D & Dynamic Synthesis in Brown Field Development: A Case Study of S-P3 Infill Well Maturation, Preparation and Drilling On the Characterisation of the Flow Regimes of Drilling Fluids Performance Evaluation of Cashew Nut Shell Liquid CNSL as Flow Improver for Waxy Crude Oils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1