Suggested Rational Considerations for ANA-IF and ENA-Profile Test Requisition: Clinical Manifestation, Gender, Pattern, and Titer of ANA-IF

Y. Surjawan, U. Intansari
{"title":"Suggested Rational Considerations for ANA-IF and ENA-Profile Test Requisition: Clinical Manifestation, Gender, Pattern, and Titer of ANA-IF","authors":"Y. Surjawan, U. Intansari","doi":"10.18585/inabj.v15i3.2346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The anti-nuclear antibody immunofluorescence (ANA-IF) test is used for screening of autoantibody presence in patients with suspected autoimmune disease. Positive ANA-IF should be followed-up with extractable nuclear antigens profile (ENA-profile). High ANA-IF sensitivity combined with low ENA-profile sensitivity, and the evolution of ANA-IF requests may result in a higher number of positive ANA-IF but negative ENA-profile. It is necessary to make an objective assessment in determining the conditions in which rational ANA-IF and ENA-profile should be suggested.METHODS: Data were retrieved retrospectively from the medical records of subjects who performed both ANA-IF and ENA-profile. ANA-IF were examined using immunofluorescence principle with cut-off 1:100. ENA-profile which contained sixteen purified antigens was performed using line-immunoblot principle. Data was analyzed descriptively and analytically using SPSS, and significant result was indicated if p<0.05.RESULTS: The ANA-IF result was dominated by negative (44.9%) and positive-speckled, titer 1:100 (32.9%). Of 923 subjects with positive ANA-IF, 45.4% had a negative ENA-profile. Of 751 subjects with negative ANA-IF, 10.2% had positive ENA-profile. In subjects whose specific clinical entity, the ANA-IF sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) in detecting ENA-profile were 93.8% and 93.3%, respectively, but the positive predictive value (PPV) was 63.2%. Women with specific autoimmune manifestation accompanied by ANA-IF homogeneous ≥1:100, or centromeres ≥1:100, or speckled ≥1:320 might have been predicted as subsequent positive ENA-profile with area under curve (AUC) of 77.2%, 76.9%, 79.2%, respectively.CONCLUSION: ANA-IF should only be indicated for those with specific clinical symptoms. For woman with typical symptoms, the presence of positive ANA-IF with homogeneous ≥1:100, or centromeres ≥1:100, or speckled ≥1:320 should be further followed-up by ENA-profile.KEYWORDS: ANA-IF, ENA-profile, autoimmune, autoantibody","PeriodicalId":22516,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Biomedical Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18585/inabj.v15i3.2346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anti-nuclear antibody immunofluorescence (ANA-IF) test is used for screening of autoantibody presence in patients with suspected autoimmune disease. Positive ANA-IF should be followed-up with extractable nuclear antigens profile (ENA-profile). High ANA-IF sensitivity combined with low ENA-profile sensitivity, and the evolution of ANA-IF requests may result in a higher number of positive ANA-IF but negative ENA-profile. It is necessary to make an objective assessment in determining the conditions in which rational ANA-IF and ENA-profile should be suggested.METHODS: Data were retrieved retrospectively from the medical records of subjects who performed both ANA-IF and ENA-profile. ANA-IF were examined using immunofluorescence principle with cut-off 1:100. ENA-profile which contained sixteen purified antigens was performed using line-immunoblot principle. Data was analyzed descriptively and analytically using SPSS, and significant result was indicated if p<0.05.RESULTS: The ANA-IF result was dominated by negative (44.9%) and positive-speckled, titer 1:100 (32.9%). Of 923 subjects with positive ANA-IF, 45.4% had a negative ENA-profile. Of 751 subjects with negative ANA-IF, 10.2% had positive ENA-profile. In subjects whose specific clinical entity, the ANA-IF sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) in detecting ENA-profile were 93.8% and 93.3%, respectively, but the positive predictive value (PPV) was 63.2%. Women with specific autoimmune manifestation accompanied by ANA-IF homogeneous ≥1:100, or centromeres ≥1:100, or speckled ≥1:320 might have been predicted as subsequent positive ENA-profile with area under curve (AUC) of 77.2%, 76.9%, 79.2%, respectively.CONCLUSION: ANA-IF should only be indicated for those with specific clinical symptoms. For woman with typical symptoms, the presence of positive ANA-IF with homogeneous ≥1:100, or centromeres ≥1:100, or speckled ≥1:320 should be further followed-up by ENA-profile.KEYWORDS: ANA-IF, ENA-profile, autoimmune, autoantibody
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANA-IF和ENA-Profile测试申请的合理考虑:临床表现,性别,模式,和ANA-IF滴度
背景:抗核抗体免疫荧光(ANA-IF)试验用于筛选自身免疫性疾病疑似患者自身抗体的存在。ANA-IF阳性应随访可提取核抗原谱(ena -谱)。高ANA-IF敏感性结合低ENA-profile敏感性,以及ANA-IF请求的演变可能导致ANA-IF阳性数量较多,而ENA-profile阴性数量较多。在确定合理建议ANA-IF和ENA-profile的条件时,有必要进行客观评价。方法:回顾性地从同时进行ANA-IF和ENA-profile的受试者的病历中检索数据。免疫荧光法检测ANA-IF,截止时间1:100。采用线免疫印迹法对含有16种纯化抗原的ena抗原进行分析。数据采用SPSS进行描述性分析,p<0.05为显著性结果。结果:ANA-IF结果以阴性(44.9%)和斑点阳性(32.9%)为主,滴度为1:100。在923例ANA-IF阳性的受试者中,45.4%为阴性。751例ANA-IF阴性受试者中,有10.2%为ena阳性。在具有特定临床实体的受试者中,ANA-IF检测ENA-profile的敏感性和阴性预测值分别为93.8%和93.3%,阳性预测值为63.2%。特异性自身免疫表现伴ANA-IF同质≥1:100,或着丝粒≥1:100,或斑点≥1:20 20的女性可能被预测为随后的ena阳性,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为77.2%,76.9%,79.2%。结论:ANA-IF仅适用于有特定临床症状的患者。对于有典型症状的女性,存在同质性≥1:100或着丝粒≥1:100或斑点性≥1:20 20的ANA-IF阳性,应进一步通过ENA-profile进行随访。关键词:ANA-IF, ena -谱,自身免疫,自身抗体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Andrographis paniculata Leaves Extract Inhibit TNF-α and Caspase-3 Expression of Septic Rats’ Intestinal Tissues Hypoglycemic Activity and Safety Assessment of Pediococcus acidilactici Strain DNH16 in Experimental Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Rats Induced with Streptozotocin Triglyceride-Glucose Index as A Crucial Marker for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Women with Insulin Resistance Obesity: A Multi Perspective of Physiology and Neurobiology Energy Regulation Intrauterine Transmission of Hepatitis B Cannot Be Ruled Out by A Single Negative Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Result among Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) - Positive Pregnant Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1