PO 18116 - Reproducibility assessment of the Lauge-Hansen classification for ankle fractures

Evandro Junior Christovan Ribeiro, F. Farias, Sérgio Damião Prata, M. Rizzo
{"title":"PO 18116 - Reproducibility assessment of the Lauge-Hansen classification for ankle fractures","authors":"Evandro Junior Christovan Ribeiro, F. Farias, Sérgio Damião Prata, M. Rizzo","doi":"10.30795/scijfootankle.2019.v13.993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study evaluated the reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen classification among orthopedic residents and more experienced orthopedists. Methods: The inclusion criteria were ankle fractures with adequate radiographs taken in anteroposterior (AP), true AP and P (profile) views, which were individually analyzed by physicians. The analysis was performed based on the Lauge-Hansen classification. The raters were 5 orthopedic professionals from our department: 3 residents and 2 board-certified orthopedists (one with less than 10 years of experience, and the other with more 10 years of experience in the field). The professionals first analyzed and classified 30 ankle fracture radiographs; then, after 1 week, they were asked to perform a new evaluation. The radiographs were shown without names or other identifying information. The classifications were subsequently examined based on the analysis of the supporting material that had been previously provided for each individual. A consensus decision regarding the classification was made among all professionals at the end of the study. Results: The professionals were asked to analyze radiographs from 30 patients with ankle fracture, among whom supination-external rotation was the most common diagnosis. The results were outlined in tables and plotted in graphs; in a second evaluation performed after 1 week, there were 66% hits and 34% errors, whereas the percentage of hits in the first evaluation was 61.33%. Conclusion: The routine use of management classifications by physicians facilitates the understanding of these classifications by other professionals in the field while increasing interobserver agreement.","PeriodicalId":21602,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of the Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30795/scijfootankle.2019.v13.993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen classification among orthopedic residents and more experienced orthopedists. Methods: The inclusion criteria were ankle fractures with adequate radiographs taken in anteroposterior (AP), true AP and P (profile) views, which were individually analyzed by physicians. The analysis was performed based on the Lauge-Hansen classification. The raters were 5 orthopedic professionals from our department: 3 residents and 2 board-certified orthopedists (one with less than 10 years of experience, and the other with more 10 years of experience in the field). The professionals first analyzed and classified 30 ankle fracture radiographs; then, after 1 week, they were asked to perform a new evaluation. The radiographs were shown without names or other identifying information. The classifications were subsequently examined based on the analysis of the supporting material that had been previously provided for each individual. A consensus decision regarding the classification was made among all professionals at the end of the study. Results: The professionals were asked to analyze radiographs from 30 patients with ankle fracture, among whom supination-external rotation was the most common diagnosis. The results were outlined in tables and plotted in graphs; in a second evaluation performed after 1 week, there were 66% hits and 34% errors, whereas the percentage of hits in the first evaluation was 61.33%. Conclusion: The routine use of management classifications by physicians facilitates the understanding of these classifications by other professionals in the field while increasing interobserver agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
踝关节骨折Lauge-Hansen分类的可重复性评估
目的:本研究评估Lauge-Hansen分类在骨科住院医师和经验丰富的骨科医师中的可重复性。方法:入选标准为踝关节骨折均有足够的正位(AP)、正位(AP)和侧位(P)片,并由医师单独分析。根据Lauge-Hansen分类进行分析。评分者为我科5名骨科专业人员,其中住院医师3名,持证骨科医师2名(一名经验不足10年,另一名经验超过10年)。专业人员首先对30张踝关节骨折x线片进行分析分类;然后,一周后,他们被要求进行新的评估。这些x光片没有显示姓名或其他识别信息。随后根据对以前为每个人提供的支助材料的分析,审查了分类。在研究结束时,所有专业人员对分类作出了共识决定。结果:要求专业人员分析30例踝关节骨折患者的x线片,其中旋后-外旋是最常见的诊断。结果以表格和图表的形式列出;在1周后进行的第二次评估中,命中率为66%,错误率为34%,而第一次评估的命中率为61.33%。结论:医师常规使用管理分类有助于其他专业人员对这些分类的理解,同时增加了观察者之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hallux valgus: Patología tridimensional. Nuevo enfoque terapéutico Conservative treatment of hallux rigidus: narrative review of scientific evidence The SUPERankle procedure in the treatment of foot and ankle deformities in fibular hemimelia Hallux rigidus: clinical examination, radiology, and classification Arthroscopic treatment for posteromedial talar process fracture (Cedell fracture): a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1