METAPHYSICAL STATUS OF PHYSICAL LAWS

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-142-153
A. Burov, L. A. Burov, I. A. Rybakova
{"title":"METAPHYSICAL STATUS OF PHYSICAL LAWS","authors":"A. Burov, L. A. Burov, I. A. Rybakova","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-142-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The creators of physics sought to construct it like Euclidean geometry, where a few mathematically formulated axioms, laws, opens the possibility of an unlimited number of theorems, conclusions concerning specific situations, verified by special observations, experiments. The idea of this program of cognition, not necessarily quite consciously, arose from what may be called Biblical Platonism, a synthesis of the Pythagorean-Platonism of antiquity and Biblical cosmism. Explicitly or not, this program implied the following properties of the laws, the atemporal logical structure of the universe: sufficient mathematical simplicity, universality, absolute precision, completeness and compatibility with life and thought, and anthropicity. The subsequent development of physics has demonstrated both a truly cosmic success and certain problems and limits of this paradigm. The former manifested in the universality of coverage and the fantastic accuracy of the mathematically elegant laws of matter discovered. The latter were related to the dualism of mind and matter, the enigma of the emergence and development of life, the discovery of the limits to the applicability of theories, and the forced rejection of some self-evident truths that previously seemed immutable. The article outlines approaches to the solution of these problems, which seem to be compatible with biblical Platonism.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2023-2-142-153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The creators of physics sought to construct it like Euclidean geometry, where a few mathematically formulated axioms, laws, opens the possibility of an unlimited number of theorems, conclusions concerning specific situations, verified by special observations, experiments. The idea of this program of cognition, not necessarily quite consciously, arose from what may be called Biblical Platonism, a synthesis of the Pythagorean-Platonism of antiquity and Biblical cosmism. Explicitly or not, this program implied the following properties of the laws, the atemporal logical structure of the universe: sufficient mathematical simplicity, universality, absolute precision, completeness and compatibility with life and thought, and anthropicity. The subsequent development of physics has demonstrated both a truly cosmic success and certain problems and limits of this paradigm. The former manifested in the universality of coverage and the fantastic accuracy of the mathematically elegant laws of matter discovered. The latter were related to the dualism of mind and matter, the enigma of the emergence and development of life, the discovery of the limits to the applicability of theories, and the forced rejection of some self-evident truths that previously seemed immutable. The article outlines approaches to the solution of these problems, which seem to be compatible with biblical Platonism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理定律的形而上学地位
物理学的创造者试图像欧几里得几何那样构建它,在欧几里得几何中,一些数学表述的公理、定律,打开了无限数量的定理、关于特定情况的结论的可能性,通过特殊的观察和实验来验证。这种认识程序的观念,并不一定是有意识地产生于所谓《圣经》的柏拉图主义,即古代的毕达哥拉斯-柏拉图主义和《圣经》的宇宙主义的综合。无论是否明确,这个程序暗示了宇宙的非时间逻辑结构的规律的以下性质:数学上足够的简单性、普适性、绝对的精确性、完备性和与生命和思想的兼容性,以及人性。物理学的后续发展既证明了宇宙的真正成功,也证明了这种范式的某些问题和局限性。前者表现在覆盖范围的广泛性和发现的物质的数学上优雅的规律的惊人的准确性。后者与精神和物质的二元论、生命的出现和发展之谜、对理论适用性限制的发现以及对一些先前似乎不变的不言而喻的真理的被迫拒绝有关。文章概述了解决这些问题的方法,这些方法似乎与圣经柏拉图主义相容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Idol Or Icon? Francisco Suárez And The Concept Of Being Art and Politics in Roger Scruton’s Conservative Philosophy by Ferenc HÖRCHER (review) Transcendental Phenomenology as Human Possibility: Husserl and Fink on the Phenomenologizing Subject by Denis DŽANIĆ (review) From Death to Life: Key Themes in Plato’s Phaedo by Franco TRABATTONI (review) Matter and Mathematics: An Essentialist Account of the Laws of Nature by Andrew YOUNAN (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1