Forging the Asean Economic Community, 2015 To 2016—and Beyond

M. Majid
{"title":"Forging the Asean Economic Community, 2015 To 2016—and Beyond","authors":"M. Majid","doi":"10.1355/9789814762878-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of 2015, ASEAN did not any more become a community of nations than remain an association of states. Words matter for the expectations they raise. ASEAN slow marched in 2015 towards the “milestone” that it was to be proclaimed a “community” at the end of it, but in reality this remains an admitted work in progress. The term “community” had been adopted in communion with, although not as a replication of, what existed in Europe. It seemed like a good idea, this approximation, which got more distant as Europe further integrated into a union of twenty-eight nation-states. Of course, nowadays, ASEAN may congratulate itself on its superior wisdom of not rushing into forming a community, let alone a union, seeing the strains and stresses in the European Union (EU). But the term “community” remained. For the private sector there are clear expectations of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), perhaps even more so than from constituents of the politicalsecurity and sociocultural pillars, the two other legs of the community proclaimed in the Kuala Lumpur Declaration of November 2015. It is in the AEC that the ASEAN Community shows the greatest promise of development. Indeed, it may very well be the AEC that will hold ASEAN together, even if it does not necessarily drive greater integration with the other two pillars. There are however challenges ahead, both internal and external to the AEC, including from geopolitical and geoeconomic forces beyond ASEAN’s loose organizational control.","PeriodicalId":21900,"journal":{"name":"Southeast Asian Affairs","volume":"27 1","pages":"43 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeast Asian Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814762878-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

At the end of 2015, ASEAN did not any more become a community of nations than remain an association of states. Words matter for the expectations they raise. ASEAN slow marched in 2015 towards the “milestone” that it was to be proclaimed a “community” at the end of it, but in reality this remains an admitted work in progress. The term “community” had been adopted in communion with, although not as a replication of, what existed in Europe. It seemed like a good idea, this approximation, which got more distant as Europe further integrated into a union of twenty-eight nation-states. Of course, nowadays, ASEAN may congratulate itself on its superior wisdom of not rushing into forming a community, let alone a union, seeing the strains and stresses in the European Union (EU). But the term “community” remained. For the private sector there are clear expectations of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), perhaps even more so than from constituents of the politicalsecurity and sociocultural pillars, the two other legs of the community proclaimed in the Kuala Lumpur Declaration of November 2015. It is in the AEC that the ASEAN Community shows the greatest promise of development. Indeed, it may very well be the AEC that will hold ASEAN together, even if it does not necessarily drive greater integration with the other two pillars. There are however challenges ahead, both internal and external to the AEC, including from geopolitical and geoeconomic forces beyond ASEAN’s loose organizational control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打造东盟经济共同体(2015年至2016年及以后
2015年底,东盟不再是一个国家共同体,而是一个国家联盟。语言对人们的期望很重要。2015年,东盟缓慢地迈向了一个“里程碑”,即它将在年底被宣布为一个“共同体”,但实际上,这仍然是一个公认的正在进行的工作。“共同体”一词的采用虽然不是复制欧洲的情况,但与欧洲的情况是相通的。这似乎是个好主意,但随着欧洲进一步整合成为28个民族国家的联盟,这个想法变得越来越遥远。当然,如今,东盟看到欧盟(EU)的紧张和压力,可能会庆幸自己没有急于组建一个共同体,更不用说一个联盟了。但“社区”一词保留了下来。对于私营部门来说,他们对东盟经济共同体(AEC)有着明确的期望,甚至可能比政治安全和社会文化支柱(共同体的另外两个支柱在2015年11月的吉隆坡宣言中宣布)的成员更期待。东盟共同体正是在东盟经济共同体中展现出最大的发展希望。事实上,很可能是AEC将东盟团结在一起,即使它不一定会推动与其他两大支柱的更大融合。然而,AEC面临着内部和外部的挑战,包括来自东盟松散组织控制之外的地缘政治和地缘经济力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Outlook for Southeast Asia: From Containment to Recovery Brunei Darussalam in 2020: Enduring Stability of a Small Monarchical State in a Turbulent Year Cambodian Foreign Policy in 2020: Chinese Friends and American Foes? Malaysia in 2020: Political Fragmentation, Power Plays and Shifting Coalitions Vietnam’s Economic Prospects in the Wake of the US-China Trade Conflict and COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1