A systematic review to determine the effectiveness of medical therapies at causing disease regression in endometriosis

T.T. Carpenter , A.S.H. Kent , R. Lawrenson
{"title":"A systematic review to determine the effectiveness of medical therapies at causing disease regression in endometriosis","authors":"T.T. Carpenter ,&nbsp;A.S.H. Kent ,&nbsp;R. Lawrenson","doi":"10.1016/j.rigapp.2006.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Endometriosis<span> is a common condition affecting around 2–10% of women of reproductive age. Various medical therapies are in widespread use for control of symptoms, however, very little is known of the effect of these therapies on the disease itself. In addition, the natural history of the condition when left untreated is far from clearly understood. If one uses medical therapies for symptom control it is possible the underlying disease may progress insidiously such that, if surgery is required in the future, may be increasingly difficult and hazardous. We reviewed the literature to assess the efficacy of any medically treatment used in endometriosis at causing regression of disease. Despite an extensive search, this issue is addressed adequately by very few studies. The data that are available suggests medroxyprogesterone acetate<span> (MPA) and luteal phase dydrogesterone<span> are probably ineffective at causing disease regression whilst </span></span></span></span>gestrinone<span> appears to be effective. The effects of danazol<span> and triptorelin are inconclusive.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101088,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Gynaecological and Perinatal Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rigapp.2006.05.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Gynaecological and Perinatal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871232006000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common condition affecting around 2–10% of women of reproductive age. Various medical therapies are in widespread use for control of symptoms, however, very little is known of the effect of these therapies on the disease itself. In addition, the natural history of the condition when left untreated is far from clearly understood. If one uses medical therapies for symptom control it is possible the underlying disease may progress insidiously such that, if surgery is required in the future, may be increasingly difficult and hazardous. We reviewed the literature to assess the efficacy of any medically treatment used in endometriosis at causing regression of disease. Despite an extensive search, this issue is addressed adequately by very few studies. The data that are available suggests medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and luteal phase dydrogesterone are probably ineffective at causing disease regression whilst gestrinone appears to be effective. The effects of danazol and triptorelin are inconclusive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定药物治疗在引起子宫内膜异位症疾病消退方面的有效性的系统综述
子宫内膜异位症是一种常见的疾病,影响约2-10%的育龄妇女。各种医学疗法被广泛用于控制症状,然而,很少知道这些疗法对疾病本身的影响。此外,如果不及时治疗,这种疾病的自然史还远没有被清楚地了解。如果一个人使用药物治疗来控制症状,那么潜在的疾病可能会在不知不觉中发展,这样,如果将来需要手术,可能会越来越困难和危险。我们回顾了文献,以评估任何用于子宫内膜异位症的药物治疗在引起疾病消退方面的疗效。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但很少有研究充分地解决了这个问题。现有的数据表明醋酸甲羟孕酮和黄体相地孕酮在引起疾病消退方面可能无效,而孕酮似乎有效。那那唑和雷普妥林的效果尚无定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents The evidence for the use of cervical cerclage Chronic pelvic pain: Aetiology and therapy Optimising in vitro fertilisation (IVF) outcome in women with endometriosis Antenatal prevention of neonatal group B streptococcal infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1