Are Health Technology Assessments Keeping Pace with Health Equity Priorities: A Review of Existing Approaches and Discussion of Emerging Practices

S. Garfield, Shannon Armstrong, Julie Nguyen, Christine Hildreth, Bianca Wu, Isabella James, Sylvie Babat, Malu Foley
{"title":"Are Health Technology Assessments Keeping Pace with Health Equity Priorities: A Review of Existing Approaches and Discussion of Emerging Practices","authors":"S. Garfield, Shannon Armstrong, Julie Nguyen, Christine Hildreth, Bianca Wu, Isabella James, Sylvie Babat, Malu Foley","doi":"10.18103/mra.v11i6.3903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health technology assessments are evaluation tools used by decision makers and governing bodies to evaluate the relative effectiveness, safety, and cost of new health technologies. Despite the significant access and reimbursement implications of the decisions informed by health technology assessments, health equity is not consistently included in these assessments. This review explores current health technology assessment approaches using global examples, examines how health technology assessments include health equity considerations, reviews how health equity is not optimally included in health technology assessments using a case study example, and discusses emerging practices to include more health equity related metrics using examples from sponsors and health technology assessment agencies. Results show that health technology assessments do not have a consistent, clearly defined measures of health equity impact or methods to include health equity-oriented measures in assessments. Additionally, most do not provide differentiated value assessments for health equity-oriented data or impact. However, innovators and health technology assessment organizations are presenting new approaches to evaluation. Some outside groups are advocating for change and investing in developing health equity checklists and frameworks for incorporation in health technology assessments. Moving forward, more research is needed to understand how to best incorporate heath equity-oriented measures into health technology assessments and how innovators can get more involved to inform both product development and evaluation efforts. If done well, health technology assessments can be developed to reward technologies and research programs that have a significant and measurable impact on delivering more equitable health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":94137,"journal":{"name":"Medical research archives","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical research archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i6.3903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health technology assessments are evaluation tools used by decision makers and governing bodies to evaluate the relative effectiveness, safety, and cost of new health technologies. Despite the significant access and reimbursement implications of the decisions informed by health technology assessments, health equity is not consistently included in these assessments. This review explores current health technology assessment approaches using global examples, examines how health technology assessments include health equity considerations, reviews how health equity is not optimally included in health technology assessments using a case study example, and discusses emerging practices to include more health equity related metrics using examples from sponsors and health technology assessment agencies. Results show that health technology assessments do not have a consistent, clearly defined measures of health equity impact or methods to include health equity-oriented measures in assessments. Additionally, most do not provide differentiated value assessments for health equity-oriented data or impact. However, innovators and health technology assessment organizations are presenting new approaches to evaluation. Some outside groups are advocating for change and investing in developing health equity checklists and frameworks for incorporation in health technology assessments. Moving forward, more research is needed to understand how to best incorporate heath equity-oriented measures into health technology assessments and how innovators can get more involved to inform both product development and evaluation efforts. If done well, health technology assessments can be developed to reward technologies and research programs that have a significant and measurable impact on delivering more equitable health outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生技术评估是否与卫生公平优先事项保持同步:对现有方法的回顾和对新兴实践的讨论
卫生技术评估是决策者和理事机构用来评估新卫生技术的相对有效性、安全性和成本的评估工具。尽管卫生技术评估所作出的决定对获取机会和偿还费用有重大影响,但这些评估并未始终包括卫生公平。本综述利用全球实例探讨了当前的卫生技术评估方法,考察了卫生技术评估如何包括卫生公平考虑因素,利用案例研究示例审查了卫生公平如何未最佳地纳入卫生技术评估,并利用赞助商和卫生技术评估机构的实例讨论了纳入更多卫生公平相关指标的新兴做法。结果表明,卫生技术评估没有一致的、明确定义的卫生公平影响衡量标准,也没有将面向卫生公平的措施纳入评估的方法。此外,大多数没有为面向卫生公平的数据或影响提供差异化的价值评估。然而,创新者和卫生技术评估组织正在提出新的评估方法。一些外部团体正在倡导变革,并投资于制定卫生公平清单和框架,以便将其纳入卫生技术评估。展望未来,需要进行更多的研究,以了解如何最好地将面向卫生公平的措施纳入卫生技术评估,以及创新者如何能够更多地参与,为产品开发和评价工作提供信息。如果做得好,可以开展卫生技术评估,以奖励对提供更公平的卫生结果产生重大和可衡量影响的技术和研究项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Achieving Chronic Care Equity by Leveraging the Telehealth Ecosystem (ACCTIVATE): A Multilevel Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Cultural Effects on the Performance of Older Haitian Immigrants on Timed Cognitive Tests. Augmenting the Hospital Score with social risk factors to improve prediction for 30-day readmission following acute myocardial infarction. Characteristics associated with social anxiety in adults with developmental stuttering: A review. Air Pollution as an Environmental Risk Factor for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1