Northern Ireland

Kerry O'Halloran
{"title":"Northern Ireland","authors":"Kerry O'Halloran","doi":"10.1177/03085759221129878a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the new hearings at first instance could reach the same decisions. Many judgements are circulated in draft to allow corrections and amendments, where necessary, before the perfected version is handed down. Given the importance of rigorous analysis and the impact of a failure to record this in the judgement, should the draft judgement be checked for analysis as well as for errors? It might require a bold advocate to ask a judge to ‘show your workings’ if a judgement is lacking, but it is clear that the appellate courts are not going to infer proper analysis if none is explicitly recorded.","PeriodicalId":92743,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & fostering","volume":"27 1","pages":"340 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & fostering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03085759221129878a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the new hearings at first instance could reach the same decisions. Many judgements are circulated in draft to allow corrections and amendments, where necessary, before the perfected version is handed down. Given the importance of rigorous analysis and the impact of a failure to record this in the judgement, should the draft judgement be checked for analysis as well as for errors? It might require a bold advocate to ask a judge to ‘show your workings’ if a judgement is lacking, but it is clear that the appellate courts are not going to infer proper analysis if none is explicitly recorded.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北爱尔兰
新的一审听证会可能会做出同样的裁决。许多判决书以草稿形式分发,以便在必要时允许进行更正和修改,然后再将完善的判决书印发。考虑到严格分析的重要性和未能在判断中记录这一点的影响,是否应该检查判断草案的分析和错误?如果缺乏判决,可能需要一个大胆的倡导者要求法官“展示你的工作”,但很明显,如果没有明确记录,上诉法院就不会推断出适当的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A heavy weight, yet empowering: Grandparent Special Guardians’ lived experiences of the role and family dynamics - An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) When people adopted from severely depriving institutions become parents: The experiences of young adult mothers from the ERA study and their adoptive parents Interrupting a cycle of placement instability with short-term residential care: Trauma-informed family-like relational practice in one specialist unit Deinstitutionalisation: A global effort to improve developmental outcomes for children A Compassion-Focused Therapy group for young people who live in foster, adoptive or kinship care: Initial development, reflections, and ways forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1