Should Uyghurs be considered an Indigenous people?

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Hau-Journal of Ethnographic Theory Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1086/721181
Musapir, Sean R. Roberts
{"title":"Should Uyghurs be considered an Indigenous people?","authors":"Musapir, Sean R. Roberts","doi":"10.1086/721181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article asks whether Uyghurs should be considered an Indigenous people. In doing so, it highlights the contested issues this question raises and seeks to initiate a more comprehensive debate on the question among Uyghurs themselves, who ultimately decide the appropriateness of such identification. The Chinese state is implementing an intense campaign against Uyghurs that bears striking resemblance to those historically waged by other settler-colonial regimes against the Indigenous peoples they displaced. Embracing indigeneity could serve as a useful strategy for at least contextualizing Uyghurs’ present repression and dispossession, but Uyghurs in the diaspora are ambivalent about the concept. The article examines both why Uyghurs can be considered an Indigenous people under UN criteria and why they are reticent to embrace this status. While Uyghurs’ ultimate acceptance of indigeneity as a means of self-identification would require the participation of all Uyghurs, including those living in the PRC who are currently unable to engage in such discussions, we argue that even a limited debate on the relevance of indigeneity to their identity among Uyghurs in exile would widen the possibilities of responses to the acts of repression, erasure, and dispossession carried out against their people inside China.","PeriodicalId":51608,"journal":{"name":"Hau-Journal of Ethnographic Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hau-Journal of Ethnographic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article asks whether Uyghurs should be considered an Indigenous people. In doing so, it highlights the contested issues this question raises and seeks to initiate a more comprehensive debate on the question among Uyghurs themselves, who ultimately decide the appropriateness of such identification. The Chinese state is implementing an intense campaign against Uyghurs that bears striking resemblance to those historically waged by other settler-colonial regimes against the Indigenous peoples they displaced. Embracing indigeneity could serve as a useful strategy for at least contextualizing Uyghurs’ present repression and dispossession, but Uyghurs in the diaspora are ambivalent about the concept. The article examines both why Uyghurs can be considered an Indigenous people under UN criteria and why they are reticent to embrace this status. While Uyghurs’ ultimate acceptance of indigeneity as a means of self-identification would require the participation of all Uyghurs, including those living in the PRC who are currently unable to engage in such discussions, we argue that even a limited debate on the relevance of indigeneity to their identity among Uyghurs in exile would widen the possibilities of responses to the acts of repression, erasure, and dispossession carried out against their people inside China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维吾尔人应该被视为土著人民吗?
这篇文章提出维吾尔人是否应该被视为土著人民。在这样做的过程中,它突出了这个问题引发的争议性问题,并试图在维吾尔人自己之间就这个问题发起一场更全面的辩论,维吾尔人最终决定这种身份的适当性。中国政府正在实施一场针对维吾尔人的激烈运动,这与历史上其他移民殖民政权针对他们流离失所的土著人民所发动的运动惊人地相似。拥抱原住民可以作为一个有用的策略,至少在维吾尔人目前的压迫和剥夺的背景下,但散居在外的维吾尔人对这个概念是矛盾的。这篇文章探讨了为什么维吾尔人在联合国的标准下可以被视为土著人民,以及为什么他们不愿意接受这一地位。虽然维吾尔人最终接受原住民作为一种自我认同的手段,需要所有维吾尔人的参与,包括那些目前无法参与此类讨论的居住在中国的维吾尔人,但我们认为,即使是在流亡维吾尔人中就原住民与他们的身份之间的相关性进行有限的辩论,也会扩大对在中国境内对其人民进行的镇压、抹除和剥夺行为的反应的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Economy, emulation, and equality: Sociogenesis in the postsocialist capitalocene Is subversion just another version of state aversion? Notes on Herzfeld’s Subversive archaism Home as a second skin On resistance and pluriversal voices of subversive archaism Migration, village sociality, and mistrust
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1